Fairly sure the word "hater" existed before the rap culture.Dango said:I would rather have people just use the term correctly. A "hater" is someone who is frustrated with and cannot comprehend someone else's success.
Fairly sure the word "hater" existed before the rap culture.Dango said:I would rather have people just use the term correctly. A "hater" is someone who is frustrated with and cannot comprehend someone else's success.
But you see, the rage and immaturity--and the typical presumption by said individual that there must be something wrong with you for having a dissenting opinion to begin with--is where the difference lies.Condor219 said:Saying "You're just a hater!" could be translated roughly into "You're just a dissenting opinion!", except with more rage and immaturity.
It's a natural reaction to thing other people are "wrong" and you are "right". Otherwise, why would you believe what you do? But having the sense to realize "We just have different opinions" instead of blindly throwing out stubborn statements at people is the difference between using "haters" ironically or not, and the differenece between an intelligent dicsussion and a flame war.Farseer Lolotea said:But you see, the rage and immaturity--and the typical presumption by said individual that there must be something wrong with you for having a dissenting opinion to begin with--is where the difference lies.Condor219 said:Saying "You're just a hater!" could be translated roughly into "You're just a dissenting opinion!", except with more rage and immaturity.
Hey, you'll get no argument from me on that. I've simply heard "hater" used far more often in flame wars than in actual arguments.Condor219 said:It's a natural reaction to thing other people are "wrong" and you are "right". Otherwise, why would you believe what you do? But having the sense to realize "We just have different opinions" instead of blindly throwing out stubborn statements at people is the difference between using "haters" ironically or not, and the differenece between an intelligent dicsussion and a flame war.
I said something against the fans in my posts? where?Nieroshai said:Escapists, "haters" are those who hate things for absolutely stupid or shaky reasons and are douchebags to anyone who disagrees with them.
Then it's not a review! If you are doing comedy skits (DOCTOR SLEEPL... I MEAN INSANO LOL) then at least do skits instead of letting your bad sense of humor intruding upon the video1. It's called a "comedy review." It's looking back at nostalgic stuff and getting a laugh at how it isn't as golden as we remember. If you don't find it funny, it is simply not your kind of humor and you should move on to something you do find funny.
I'd prefer "distracting circlejerk" but random cameo is also good2. Random cameo? How about "tight-knit community based on entertaining their fans?" Although, I can't explain their appeal to someone who supposedly has already seen them. It's an acquired taste?
3. Stupid plotline? Well that's an opinion so it's literally impossible for me to comment on that. There's a ton of fans who love the plotlines, but I guess they're idiots with no sense of true humor, right?
But your species doesn't listen to thought-out rebuttals. Which is why your title fits
Ad hominem. What it is if there are no logical points in the statement. You once again prove my point by rebutting my points with pure drivel and distract from the debate itself. Also, your poster's wit is nonexistant if it does not apply. By the way, stop responding if you aren't going to actually contribute information that shows you know what you're talking about. You're just yelling incoherently at the picture of a redheaded Japanese anime character from here on.hem dazon 90 said:I said something against the fans in my posts? where?Nieroshai said:Escapists, "haters" are those who hate things for absolutely stupid or shaky reasons and are douchebags to anyone who disagrees with them.
Then it's not a review! If you are doing comedy skits (DOCTOR SLEEPL... I MEAN INSANO LOL) then at least do skits instead of letting your bad sense of humor intruding upon the video1. It's called a "comedy review." It's looking back at nostalgic stuff and getting a laugh at how it isn't as golden as we remember. If you don't find it funny, it is simply not your kind of humor and you should move on to something you do find funny.
I'd prefer "distracting circlejerk" but random cameo is also good2. Random cameo? How about "tight-knit community based on entertaining their fans?" Although, I can't explain their appeal to someone who supposedly has already seen them. It's an acquired taste?
3. Stupid plotline? Well that's an opinion so it's literally impossible for me to comment on that. There's a ton of fans who love the plotlines, but I guess they're idiots with no sense of true humor, right?
But it's supposed to be a review! not a variety show of questionable humor value!
But your species doesn't listen to thought-out rebuttals. Which is why your title fits
Wait. Which words in that post were "big" or "elitist"?hem dazon 90 said:Cool cop-out bro. I really dig using big words that you think makes you sound like some kind of intellectual, but really makes you seem elitist.