If they do the think where games follow logic it'll probably be as simple as you're a guy walking around with an arsenal and the police will be interested in that. Fortunately it's on PC so i'm sure a flowers and bunny rabbits mod will happen before too long.SweetShark said:In a Steam Discussion, one of the developers said if you as a player don't start killing immediately, the game will find a way to pull the trigger in the end.
I hope for illusions of you starting killing Demons, only to find that the demons was people.
I thought Angry Joe don't have any kind of interest to play this game at all. The game is after all in his Top 10 Disappointments of 2014.inu-kun said:I'll just wait for Yahtzee's/Angry Joe's review, who knows, maybe the game will be a good subversion or deconstruction, maybe the gameplay will be great, maybe the story will be more than meets the eye... not likely, but there are always surprises.
It's like Nathan explosion had a game madeThomas Guy said:As much as I can see this doing good for the industries fear of AO, this game is just so stupid and juvenile looking. The trailer sounded like some pissed of 15 year olds facebook whine session.
man where have you been?BreakfastMan said:Well, if this gets on steam, despite the AO rating and the controversy, lets get the gay dating game on there too. Open up the flood-gates to the sex games, straight or not. And no, I am not being sarcastic, they really should do this. Fight the sex prudes and the homophobes, yo.
its an indie game, do you expect the dialogue to be anything above fanfiction tier?vledleR said:It does kind of irk me that so many people completely dismiss the premise of Hatred. There is some value in a game that takes an open ended chaos genre, similar to GTA, and does away with the black humor and satire, and instead, does it with a completely straight face. Kind of like what Spec Ops: The Line did with the modern military shooter genre, stripping away the things that make us feel comfortable and the false sense of justification with the violence.
Given how laughable the main characters monologue is in Hatred's trailer..I doubt that will be that effective ;p
are you implying thats a bad thing in any way shape or form?Soda Spider said:It's like Nathan explosion had a game madeThomas Guy said:As much as I can see this doing good for the industries fear of AO, this game is just so stupid and juvenile looking. The trailer sounded like some pissed of 15 year olds facebook whine session.
I was thinking more graphic. Around the time Hatred was in greenlight, there was a gay dating sim that got rejected because it was too explicit. That "My Ex-Boyfriend" game has sex on the same level as Leasure Suit Larry, from what I gather. And the steam version of Huniepop was censored so it could be on steam, from what I remember; the full game that you can get from the website includes more nudity and explicit sex scenes. So yeah, if steam breaks their "no AO games" rule for this nonsense, how about they break their "no sex" rule as well?NuclearKangaroo said:man where have you been?BreakfastMan said:Well, if this gets on steam, despite the AO rating and the controversy, lets get the gay dating game on there too. Open up the flood-gates to the sex games, straight or not. And no, I am not being sarcastic, they really should do this. Fight the sex prudes and the homophobes, yo.
http://store.steampowered.com/app/312970/
http://store.steampowered.com/app/339800/ (the main character can either be a man or a lesbian)
i am not one bit agaisnt games with sexual content being sold on steamBreakfastMan said:I was thinking more graphic. Around the time Hatred was in greenlight, there was a gay dating sim that got rejected because it was too explicit. That "My Ex-Boyfriend" game has sex on the same level as Leasure Suit Larry, from what I gather. And the steam version of Huniepop was censored so it could be on steam, from what I remember; the full game that you can get from the website includes more nudity and explicit sex scenes. So yeah, if steam breaks their "no AO games" rule for this nonsense, how about they break their "no sex" rule as well?NuclearKangaroo said:man where have you been?BreakfastMan said:Well, if this gets on steam, despite the AO rating and the controversy, lets get the gay dating game on there too. Open up the flood-gates to the sex games, straight or not. And no, I am not being sarcastic, they really should do this. Fight the sex prudes and the homophobes, yo.
http://store.steampowered.com/app/312970/
http://store.steampowered.com/app/339800/ (the main character can either be a man or a lesbian)
Well, people have to give a shit first. Apparently people gave a shit about Hatred, for some unknown reason. We need to figure out how to get people to give a shit about sexually explicit games (preferably gay-themed ones, otherwise those will be left out in the cold when straight-themed ones get on steam, because icky gays). Maybe get /v/ to rally around some yuri game on greenlight, to get that in. That could work...NuclearKangaroo said:i am not one bit agaisnt games with sexual content being sold on steamBreakfastMan said:I was thinking more graphic. Around the time Hatred was in greenlight, there was a gay dating sim that got rejected because it was too explicit. That "My Ex-Boyfriend" game has sex on the same level as Leasure Suit Larry, from what I gather. And the steam version of Huniepop was censored so it could be on steam, from what I remember; the full game that you can get from the website includes more nudity and explicit sex scenes. So yeah, if steam breaks their "no AO games" rule for this nonsense, how about they break their "no sex" rule as well?NuclearKangaroo said:man where have you been?BreakfastMan said:Well, if this gets on steam, despite the AO rating and the controversy, lets get the gay dating game on there too. Open up the flood-gates to the sex games, straight or not. And no, I am not being sarcastic, they really should do this. Fight the sex prudes and the homophobes, yo.
http://store.steampowered.com/app/312970/
http://store.steampowered.com/app/339800/ (the main character can either be a man or a lesbian)
so, yeah, why not
i think its better to simply rally for more sexual content, if that goes through, the gay stuff will obviously follow, valve has clearly shown no interest in where you put your dick/vaginaBreakfastMan said:Well, people have to give a shit first. Apparently people gave a shit about Hatred, for some unknown reason. We need to figure out how to get people to give a shit about sexually explicit games (preferably gay-themed ones, otherwise those will be left out in the cold when straight-themed ones get on steam, because icky gays). Maybe get /v/ to rally around some yuri game on greenlight, to get that in. That could work...NuclearKangaroo said:i am not one bit agaisnt games with sexual content being sold on steamBreakfastMan said:I was thinking more graphic. Around the time Hatred was in greenlight, there was a gay dating sim that got rejected because it was too explicit. That "My Ex-Boyfriend" game has sex on the same level as Leasure Suit Larry, from what I gather. And the steam version of Huniepop was censored so it could be on steam, from what I remember; the full game that you can get from the website includes more nudity and explicit sex scenes. So yeah, if steam breaks their "no AO games" rule for this nonsense, how about they break their "no sex" rule as well?NuclearKangaroo said:man where have you been?BreakfastMan said:Well, if this gets on steam, despite the AO rating and the controversy, lets get the gay dating game on there too. Open up the flood-gates to the sex games, straight or not. And no, I am not being sarcastic, they really should do this. Fight the sex prudes and the homophobes, yo.
http://store.steampowered.com/app/312970/
http://store.steampowered.com/app/339800/ (the main character can either be a man or a lesbian)
so, yeah, why not
Not at allNuclearKangaroo said:its an indie game, do you expect the dialogue to be anything above fanfiction tier?vledleR said:It does kind of irk me that so many people completely dismiss the premise of Hatred. There is some value in a game that takes an open ended chaos genre, similar to GTA, and does away with the black humor and satire, and instead, does it with a completely straight face. Kind of like what Spec Ops: The Line did with the modern military shooter genre, stripping away the things that make us feel comfortable and the false sense of justification with the violence.
Given how laughable the main characters monologue is in Hatred's trailer..I doubt that will be that effective ;p
did you play dust? i still cringe
are you implying thats a bad thing in any way shape or form?Soda Spider said:It's like Nathan explosion had a game madeThomas Guy said:As much as I can see this doing good for the industries fear of AO, this game is just so stupid and juvenile looking. The trailer sounded like some pissed of 15 year olds facebook whine session.
Yeah, I mean really. How hard would it be to implement a age restriction system that specifically requires the holder of the credit card attached to the account and email and to have users specifically enable seeing these games in the store? Go ahead and add a secondary password to enable showing them at all in the games list and not run from the executable or at all offline, in case you have kids that play on your account.Callate said:Interesting. I wonder if this will lead to the AO rating being more legitimized, or prove to be an extremely unusual exception. I suspect games could actually stand to make more use of AO; some "M" games are surprisingly tame, others really shouldn't be played by anyone under 17, but I don't always get the impression every parent is as on top of monitoring the ratings of what their progeny plays as they should be.
In any case, I'm glad to hear Valve is bold enough to stick to their guns; now it's just up to Destructive Creations to make a game that's actually worth playing, rather than one that's simply milking controversy.
Eh, I would have to oppose this, since I don't actually have a credit card, yet I'm more old enough to buy this game.Mutant1988 said:Yeah, I mean really. How hard would it be to implement a age restriction system that specifically requires the holder of the credit card attached to the account and email and to have users specifically enable seeing these games in the store? Go ahead and add a secondary password to enable showing them at all in the games list and not run from the executable or at all offline, in case you have kids that play on your account.
I think we need to stop and think about how ridiculous it is that a single woman's nipple is more offensive than graphic murder. It's an attitude that's so ingrained that when you actually step back and look at it you realise just how preposterous it is.The US needs to get over it's hang-ups about sexuality. Hell, Valve is based in the states - If they can get the sales of erotic games going that's more tax money to benefit everyone else.
Hmm, yeah. I suppose there's payment methods that aren't specifically tied to a person - Like pre-paid cards.FirstNameLastName said:Eh, I would have to oppose this, since I don't actually have a credit card, yet I'm more old enough to buy this game.
Uncomfortable questions they are too immature themselves to answer.FirstNameLastName said:I can more or less understand the opposition to showing sex to minors, but I wonder what the prudes actually think will happen if nudity is show "too early."