ninjastovall0 said:No I was only asking GUYS if they had met GIRL gamers in real life basically(btw-some had some hadnt), granted my wording could have been better but then again others could have reframed from flaming me for 5 seconds to try to see what I meant.
It doesnt matter its been removed and now theres a thread based on THIS thread as well.
I see some kind of contradiction here. You asked "GUYS if they had met GIRL gamers in real life" and yet some how "(a polite girl) answered my question in a private message." You weren't even asking the question of girls.ninjastovall0 said:Actually someone here at the escapist (a polite girl) answered my question in a private message.
Oh, man. I majored in Psychology in college and we have a little rivalry with the Sociology department. I wish I could go back in time and call those phonies all Sociology Shmervs!Ladette said:CAPTCHA!: Sociology shmerv
This is approximately my favourite thread ever.Azrael the Cat said:In response to ninjastovall0's thread on girl gamers.
Have you ever met an authentic guy gamer? (has adequate background in gaming) and these are the qualifications/qualities for being authentic:
1. They didn't get into gaming because their friends were into it, or because their parents just bought them a console/PC. Basically like other gamers, they saw a game and just intuitively knew they would enjoy it, despite absolutely no social/common experience of it with friends to indicate it might be fun.
2. They actually play main titles like Sims and WoW that sell massive units and have online interaction (sorry CoD, Halo and other ultra-masculine space marine penis-fests, you're not real games).
3. Whatever they like they have substantial knowledge about its past, such as being able to expain in detail the market circumstances that led Origin to agreeing to the EA takeover, the histories of Interplay and SSI and can carry a conversation by adding their own points/knowledge/past.(example: if the XBox/PS2 is their first, they probably can't).
4. They're willing to talk about gaming in public, even when they are trying to pick up a good looking girl who clearly isn't into gaming at a party, and even if most of the people in the conversation aren't actually interest in gaming.
I ask this because the guy that posted this thread: http://www.escapistmagazine.com/forums/read/9.262773-Authentic-girl-gamer can't tell the difference between his personal limited experience of gaming (seriously, it seems like he hasn't even been gaming for 20 years yet - OBVIOUSLY he doesn't have the same experiences that I have when I was cranking through the Origin games in the 80s, which makes him less hardcore and, by his reasoning, obviously not a gamer...) and 'being a gamer'.
Bro, look a bit closer will you.eatenbyagrue said:Wow. This is just. Wow.
I don't want to comment, because honestly. If everyone was an "authentic guy gamer" like OP wants, all of us who play games would be classified as what could charitably be "socially retarded man-children"
Oh. Oh dear. I feel like a total jackass now.Sirensomn said:Bro, look a bit closer will you.eatenbyagrue said:Wow. This is just. Wow.
I don't want to comment, because honestly. If everyone was an "authentic guy gamer" like OP wants, all of us who play games would be classified as what could charitably be "socially retarded man-children"
A lot of people don't seem to get the OP's point, which was to mock a dude that made a thread almost identical to this but about 'authentic girl gamers'.
This is satire, the main difference between this thread and the other one, in which the OP was serious about standards like these.
This, I agree with you completely person on the internet, the first guy was obviously asking a relatively simple question but he just phrased it a bit stupidlyFieryTrainwreck said:Seriously, why do people work so hard to misunderstand other people on the internet? It was exceedingly obvious what the guy meant, and yet everyone lambasted him for imprecise language. Semantics hounds can grind every discussion to a crashing halt if you let them, and that's apparently the direction we've gone here.
Edit: also, entirely unbelievably juxtaposition is probably the shittiest form of satire.
Actually the irony in his post was quite obvious.lacktheknack said:GiantRaven said:My comment wasn't meant in even the vaguest sense of seriousness.
That's self-indulgent irony, then, because there's absolutely no evidence in your post of your intent. Making your post a failed satire of... a satire. Huh.