That's touching on the point I was trying to make actually. Our king is more of a symbol of a part of our culture than anything else. I don't think he ever voices his personal oppinion on anything vagualy political or if he is even alowed to. And my post is mostly related to his role in sporting events, and how it makes me feel.Not G. Ivingname said:Shouldn't this be in R&P section?Meanmoose said:In Norway we have a royal family. A king, queen and a crown prince. naturally they have no real power whatsoever, because that would be silly. But then what's the point? The whole thing is really quite strange right? I've allways liked the fact that we have a royal family but ive also had a tough time explaining why. It all dawned on me during the ski world championship the other day. It was back in Norway at last after over a decade. No other sporting event (except the winter Olympics) comes even close to being such a big deal. Our king was at the center of it all. Every winner of an event is personally congratulated by the king and his family after it's conclusion on the royal part of the stands. It's ritual that all the athletes seems to love. Maybe it makes them feel like knights or something.
The king is like a living, breathing historical artifact. A living piece of our past. And I think that's pretty awesome. Besides, what would we do with our royal palace, without a king to but in it?
Does your country have a king? what are your thoughts on royalty?
A king by it's very nature is poltical.