Monument's Men, Noah and Interstellar sound good/interesting. All the bullshit superhero sequels should be fun to watch/criticize.
Hey now, I can totally see a gritty Grimlok. A genius autobot who by some accident or nefarious Decepticon scheme loses his intelligence and yet retains memory of who he used to be, forced into a shell of his former self? What pathos, what catharsis... Of course Michael Bay may not pull that off unless he decides to secretly hire Christopher Nolan to write his script under a pen-name...hermes200 said:Ok, might be interesting.no more Shia LaBeouf, a promise to be "less goofy" from Michael Bay...Aaaaand, you lost me there, Bob....The freakin' DINOBOTS
Sorry, but "less goofy" doesn't sit well with the Dinobots concept in the same phrase. At this point I would rather take a) A movie that drops the Dinobots (or any other series exclusively made to sell toys on top of all the other series exclusively made to sell toys built on top of 3 movies) entirely, or b) Micheal Bay fully embracing goofy, just not his version of goofy. His is just bad.
Realistically that should be a terrifying movie, I mean they're Vikings. The world was safe while they were focused on their war against the dragons, but now that threat is gone and they all have flying dragon mounts... the rest of the world is totally going to get raped & pillaged all to hell.RTK1576 said:I'm adding How To Train Your Dragon 2 to the mix. I really enjoyed the first one, and the trailers for the sequel look promising. Call me cautiously optimistic.
Setting aside the complexities of movie scheduling, I would not view the two as competing any more than Sex and the City versus Iron Man. One will be aimed primarily at older women (Grey) while the other is likely to be regarded as more family fare, attracting younger and more male audiences.vid87 said:"Guardians" gets annihilated at the box office by "50 Shades of Grey" (coming out around the same time, I think even the same day!)
Oh man, I totally forgot about that movie. MovieBob rarely does the kid movies it seems, so I guess I shouldn't be surprised it wasn't on his list. But yeah, I'm looking forward to that one.RTK1576 said:I'm adding How To Train Your Dragon 2 to the mix. I really enjoyed the first one, and the trailers for the sequel look promising. Call me cautiously optimistic.
The Wolverine did that good? Man that is dissapointing.Kumagawa Misogi said:Sorry Bob but audiences disagree with you about how the direction of the X-men films should go with "first Class" being the 2nd lowest grossing (after the first) and least profitable X-men film while "The Wolverine" is both 2nd highest grossing (after "The Last Stand") and 2nd most profitable (after X2).
Guardians of the Galaxy this years Lone Ranger at least in regards to how much money it's going to lose
The only thing I can think of is that it's likely CGI animation skills don't quite carry over to stop-motion, and they'd have to get a completely different team if they'd want real stop-motion. Or they just really like their (non)stop-motion style.SecondPrize said:Some of those could be interesting. I've never heard about the lego movie but your description begs the question, is there some advantage to using cgi to recreate stop motion over just using stop motion? Also, while I am willing to concede theoretically that it is possible to not have liked Monsters, how the hell can you not like monsters?
I really enjoyed 300 for brazenly cranking everything up to eleven, but its ending really reminds me of The Matrix - mostly in just how much it doesn't need a sequel.AstaresPanda said:300, yeh no need really but i guess with spartacus being so popular its time to milk that era abit more. 1st was not bad, it was a graphic novel. Was fun, and over the time. Did not get stupid.
I'd like to point out first, and with no snark or meanness intended, that what I posted was semi-sarcastic just for fun - I just thought it'd be pretty cool if a somewhat wild prediction came true (granted the Intersteller one might not be that far-fetched - should've said it would be god-awful). That said, Iron Man 3 may have "won" 2013, but Hunger Games 2 posted the 3rd largest box office worldwide ($400 million difference, sure, but there it is) and is set ot surpass IM3 in the domestic box office. I'm not disagreeing with you at all, but I get the feeling, however slight, that between "Guardians" being the "risky" venture and the buzz around "50" including an internet meltdown that the cast was changed, I imagine we're in for a few surprises, even if it doesn't go as far as I "predicted."The Gentleman said:Setting aside the complexities of movie scheduling, I would not view the two as competing any more than Sex and the City versus Iron Man. One will be aimed primarily at older women (Grey) while the other is likely to be regarded as more family fare, attracting younger and more male audiences.vid87 said:"Guardians" gets annihilated at the box office by "50 Shades of Grey" (coming out around the same time, I think even the same day!)