I think you missed the whole point of The Batman-Joker relationship:sumanoskae said:Batman in Arkham City once again refuses to kill the Joker, because apparently his life more valuable then all the people he's killed
I think you missed the whole point of The Batman-Joker relationship:sumanoskae said:Batman in Arkham City once again refuses to kill the Joker, because apparently his life more valuable then all the people he's killed
(It's been a couple years now, so spoilers aren't really needed anymore. )Tayh said:A renegade Shepard will savein ME3. A Paragon Shepard won't.Kelly Chambers
Just thought I'd throw that out there.
The thematic purpose? I greatly enjoy the thematic purpose of their relationship, due in no small part to how unheroic it paints Batman out to be. I think the point IS how irrational Batman is about the situation, Joker himself knows this, and feeds the dynamic.Sensko said:I think you missed the whole point of The Batman-Joker relationship:sumanoskae said:Batman in Arkham City once again refuses to kill the Joker, because apparently his life more valuable then all the people he's killed
My first time doing that mission... Oh god...Saviordd1 said:Feros, when you have the option (which is the renegade option) to go in guns blazing and shoot all of the colonists. Despite the fact you have knock out grenades and a melee attack.bigfatcarp93 said:Um... no you don't? Seriously, when the fuck was this?Saviordd1 said:This is implying Renegade/Paragon was anything other than "black v. white"
I mean, in the first game you have the option to slaughter a colony because renegade shepard just isn't feelin' the whole saving people thing today.
You shoot Mordin to prevent the genophage cure. The krogan have proved their stupidity numerous times. I actually have no clue when or why you can shoot Legion, so...??Saviordd1 said:When arguing you have to put it into the binary otherwise its un-arguable, which eliminates a few of your points.TT Kairen said:For one, if you look at Shepard in either 100% Paragon or Renegade at all, you're doing it wrong. Anybody who does a 100% playthrough doesn't know how to roleplay a character, and is probably a boring person.Saviordd1 said:No, that's lazy and evil.saluraropicrusa said:I would contest that Paragon/Renegade is, for the most part, anything BUT "black v. white." The majority of renegade choices aren't about being evil, they're about being kind of a dick but doing so with the ultimate goal of saving everyone. Renegade Shepard doesn't have time for anyone's shit, they want to finish the job in a way that gives them the best possible advantage against their enemy without caring who they have to step on. That's not evil, it's just being an ass about it.Saviordd1 said:This is implying Renegade/Paragon was anything other than "black v. white"
I mean, in the first game you have the option to slaughter a colony because renegade shepard just isn't feelin' the whole saving people thing today.
I figured the way renegade Shep would justify their actions on Feros would be to say that they're working to save the ENTIRE GALAXY, so a handful of dead colonists was the least of their worries. It's strange that your teammates just go along with it though.
Lets also go down the list of things renegade Shepard has done
*Shot their friends
*Continuously tells their teammates to shut the hell up about their problems
*Punches a reporter
*Kills the leading government for humanities gain
*Gets countless innocents killed cause fuck it
*Leaves a refinery to burn for one mans personal bullshit
*Let one of the greatest warriors in the galaxy commit suicide and then killed her daughter, cause fuck it
and more I've forgotten.
These aren't "Looking at the big picture" these are being evil and lazy. That's what renegade Shepard is, and has been, evil and lazy.
That said, there are certain Renegade options that are very impulsive and seem to have no basis. You only listed one.
1) Shot their friends. The ones you can shoot being Wrex, and surviving squadmate in 3. Both have perfectly justifiable purposes.
2) Tells their teammates to shut up. Insensitive and maintains a level of professional distance, yes. Evil? No.
3) Punches reporter. Reckless and impulsive. Likely put in for the lulz.
4) Kills the leading government for humanity's gain. What you fail to mention is that there are two options for the Council dying, but you only mention one in a biased attempt to strengthen your argument. Yes, selfishly allowing them to die is possible. But another, also Renegade option, has you genuinely leave them to die for the sole purpose of throwing as much fire at Sovereign as possible. Obviously the player knows Sovereign dies either way. Shepard does not.
5) When does he get countless innocents killed for no good reason? Ever?
6) Leaves a refinery to burn for one man's vendetta. What you fail to mention is the person he is hunting. He is a proven murderer, backstabber, drug dealer, slaver, and a far bigger general asshole than the guy you're helping. Sacrificing 20 or so meaningless refinery workers to stop a man who's probably caused the deaths or ruination of thousands of people through his organization is an easy choice.
7) Lets (spoiler) kill herself and then kill her daughter because fuck it. Uh, no. Allowing her to kill herself is simply allowing her to fulfill her own Code without interference. Do you presume to interpose your beliefs on another species' culture? Quite insensitive. The daughter is an Ardat-Yakshi, so I can see the practical reasons for killing her, as far as containing the Ardat-Yakshi threat. If you're killing her to prevent Banshification though, you're an asshat. There's already a billion Banshees, will one more really make or break your mission?
And lets not forget how you can shoot Mordin,and Legion.
As for the innocents see Feros.
And so rather than put her daughter in the custody of the Asari government (Which you would do if you didn't want to "interpose your beliefs on another species' culture) you decide to shoot her.
Brilliant.
During the mission on Rannoch, at the end when you're deciding who to side with, if you side with the Quarians and let the Geth die, Legion attacks Shepard and tells him he won't let him decide the Geth's fate. Tali stabs him in the back, and you are given a Renegade prompt to shoot Legion, not one, not twice, but three times. If you don't take the first prompt, Tali will shoot Legion. Neither the second or third prompt is needed, they're both superfluous. Here's a video!TT Kairen said:You shoot Mordin to prevent the genophage cure. The krogan have proved their stupidity numerous times. I actually have no clue when or why you can shoot Legion, so...??
Tayh was talking about saving her in number 3. When you meet her on the citadel you eventually get a paragon/renegade option either congratulating her for helping the refugees (paragon fuzzy on wording and all it's been a while) or telling her to change her name/fake her death because cerberus doesn't just let people leave. LaterVuliev said:(It's been a couple years now, so spoilers aren't really needed anymore. )Tayh said:A renegade Shepard will savein ME3. A Paragon Shepard won't.Kelly Chambers
Just thought I'd throw that out there.
You can save Kelly as any kind of Shepard--the only condition in saving her is going straight to Legion's loyalty mission, and then going through the Omega 4 Relay. Now, only a "Renegade" Shepard can save the Horizon colonists, since to do that you have to get the IFF as soon as the mission's available, and you have to skip Legion's loyalty and go straight through the Relay.
Save Chambers/crew: Horizon --> (get ALL THE THINGS) --> IFF --> Legion's loyalty --> Suicide Mission.
Save Chambers/crew and colonists: Horizon --> IFF --> Suicide Mission.
I've never really seen the decision to get the IFF (along with plenty of other "Paragon/Renegade" choices) as Paragon/Renegade, but rather as cautious Shepard versus reckless Shepard.
All of the protagonists in that game are shitheads.AgentLampshade said:Snow. Fucking. Villiers. Dumbass self-proclaimed "hero" and complete tool who even says "heroes don't need plans." Argh!
Every single thing he does isn't thought through at all.
Corvo isn't supposed to be a hero, he's supposed to be a revenge-driven bastard with a job to do. Besides, you can kill every target and still get the low chaos endingkman123 said:Dishonored really screwed up on the good/bad moral dilemma, seeing as the 'good' version of doing things is far, far worse than death. Selling someone into slavery for the rest of their life? Giving up that woman to that stalker dude was fucking creepy. I'd rather just kill her but nooooooooo I had to get the GOOD ending.
it doesnt ALWAYS happen, it just happens a lot. It's a pretty buggy game.Seth Carter said:Oh thats not a bug, it always happens. I think it might be a translation goof between Slain/Defeat. That happens with the Hydra too earlier, it just runs away (and regenerates the head, by the by) and everyone gets all crazy about it.
I think the deadpan delivery was intentional. Jason is trying to be an action movie star, and always comes up short, even while he becomes a badass. The game doesn't want you to agree with his choices, either, as evidenced by the two endings.Tom_green_day said:When the guy in Far Cry 3 dumps his girlfriend. I thought she was his rock, the person meant to represent the side of him which was remaining sane? You can't just forget about her for the second half of the game or you're missing out a vital aspect of his story arc, him not knowing what to do about it and keeping himself on the fence.
He says it in such a bland voice, and then when he leaves he's like 'that wasn't as hard as I thought' Well obviously fekkin not if you didn't even feel a thing about it -.-
GOW3 was almost justified: thanks to the retcon bullshit about pandora's box, they were evil and paranoid and were trying to kill him ever since he became a god. But again, its bullshit retconning, so it gets no points from me.Bayushi_Kouya said:I feel the need to come to Kratos' defence on some points -- I'm not contesting that he's a huge throbbing jackass who's killed people for no reason (GOW3)
in GOW2, kratos murders every person he sees so he can take their stuff. Some of them are doing their divinely-appointed JOBS, others are there for the exact same reason he is: selfish hubris. You can't tell Perseus to fuck off because HIS quest to change his fate is less important than YOURS. Or the Barbarian King who beat Kratos in honorable combat, and then got fucked over by deus ex machina., but he's not the complete monster he's made out to be. Every single person he encounters in GOW1-2 that he has to kill could have gotten the hell out of his way, or helped him and earned their lives, but people keep telling him no, apparently oblivious to what happens when you say no to a man who doesn't believe in giving up.
No, the worst we can say is that Kratos is a selfish, arrogant psychopath who ruins his own life several times over, fails to accept his responsibility, and blames everyone else and murders anyone who stands in his way as a response to the slights he believes he suffers.The worst you could say is that Kratos is a force for evolution, because he weeds out the stupid with alarming efficiency.
Well, there's the problem: In the first game, they reward him for his service and he happily takes up the mantle of the God of War and causes WWII. The sequels (as they often do) proceed to ruin everything. But let's go through the whole (main) series to examine why he's so awfulSimilarly, I can't feel sympathy for the gods he kills because he is the enemy they created. He would have been happy if they just erased his brain, or just let him die, but no, they HAD to do their usual thing of forcing someone to live in torment.
I said Mass Effect 3, not Mass Effect 2.Vuliev said:You can save Kelly as any kind of Shepard--the only condition in saving her is going straight to Legion's loyalty mission, and then going through the Omega 4 Relay. Now, only a "Renegade" Shepard can save the Horizon colonists, since to do that you have to get the IFF as soon as the mission's available, and you have to skip Legion's loyalty and go straight through the Relay.Tayh said:A renegade Shepard will savein ME3. A Paragon Shepard won't.Kelly Chambers
Just thought I'd throw that out there.
When I first booted up the game, not knowing what to expect, I thought it was going to involve more platforming and mechanical/animal hazards, with perhaps a tad of gunplay against humans, just for spice. The opening cinematic set a lighthearted, adventurous, Indiana Jones tone. (Yes, I know Indy kills a few people, but a few is a few). That was what I was expecting, that fights to the death would be rare, dramatic moments. Then Nate goes on to wage a one-man war against an endless army of nameless mooks we're supposed to accept are evil and disposable because they have dark skin. It just seemed out of place. It's been a while since I played the game, maybe I'm forgetting the part where they got hit with the big rubber stamp that says E V I L.imahobbit4062 said:Really? Why does Nathan Drake always come up in threads like this?
Considering everyone he kills is either a pirate, mercenary soldier who have been killing innocents or henchmen for an evil organization that is trying to poison others. To put it simple, all bad dudes.
Wherps, my bad. I don't think I even remember this encounter at all, though--I probably missed it.darkcalling said:Tayh was talking about saving her in number 3.
Well... that's because he was going insane.Tom_green_day said:When the guy in Far Cry 3 dumps his girlfriend. I thought she was his rock, the person meant to represent the side of him which was remaining sane? You can't just forget about her for the second half of the game or you're missing out a vital aspect of his story arc, him not knowing what to do about it and keeping himself on the fence.
You can get the good ending and still kill every target, I'm sure.kman123 said:Dishonored really screwed up on the good/bad moral dilemma, seeing as the 'good' version of doing things is far, far worse than death. Selling someone into slavery for the rest of their life? Giving up that woman to that stalker dude was fucking creepy. I'd rather just kill her but nooooooooo I had to get the GOOD ending.