close they are both related... Richard the Lionhart did give each man a banner too look like there were more there than there actually was but what actually defeated Saladins large Army was he single-handedly charged the saracen line stark naked. He surprised the saracens apparently coming out of nowhere. the saracens tried to kill him; shooting arrows and crossbows non of them hitting him, When he reached their lines he killed several men without a blow landing on him. The Saracens thought he was a demon and fled. Thus Richard Defeated a force of several thousand more than him. Funny story.Deadpoolsbrain said:He died of gangrene brought about from an arrow wound and didn't he give each man a flag and have them stand around behind a hill so that he scared them into surrendering (I admit I could be entirely mistaken about this).D.C. said:Deadpoolsbrain said:Yep it's all fun except when you're killing the Irish...
Yehhh ... they never let that one go. (joke)
Yeh theres no denying What happened to maintain the British Empire... but it's something that has always happened in the world and still goes on today... so I dont feel too bad about it.. I've excepted it as a part of life.Pallindromemordnillap said:Just don't mention how we got and maintained that Empire...D.C. said:snip
Back OT How did Richard the Lionheart die? and more intrestingly how did he defeat the Saracans at the seige of Jaffa with only 55 men?
You got it! They had no concept of linear time; it was cyclic to them.Pallindromemordnillap said:They viewed it as a circle, right? With events repeating themselves as you go round and roundHow did the Mayans view time?
1. Cyclical would be my guess.historybuff said:How did the Mayans view time?
What ruins is the Coliseum constructed over?
When did Denmark get a constitution?
Sigel said:No, the first recorded use of the word America is in relation to an expedition made up in Labrador two years before Vespucci. This expedition was funded by Richard Ameryk, so the new land was named after him. I gave a much better explanation on the first pageSpaceman_Spiff said:No, actually we were both wrong. Amerigo Vespucci who was an Italian explorer (my bad)who explored what we today consider the South American continent between 1497-1502 and who was the first to say it was not the West Indies. German cartographers Martin Waldseemuller and Matthias Ringmann were actually the ones who named the continent after Vespucci using the latin version of his name but the feminine form of it. In 1538, another German, Gerand Mercater, used it to name the North American continent in his map. Sorry, no Welsh involved.Sigel said:Wrong, it was most likely named after Welsh businessman Richard Ameryk. If it were named after Vespucci it would be called Vespucciland or some other derivationPallindromemordnillap said:It named after an Italian map maker name Amerigo Vispucci(sp?), who made the first map of what was considered the "New World" and it showed the continents of North and South America. It wasn't geographically accurate in the least. He was considered the first to do it though.bodyklok said:Who was America named after? (This is a seriously tricky question, just so your forewarned)![]()
Pallindromemordnillap said:"shrug" Wikipedia would like to disagree with you.Sigel said:No, the first recorded use of the word America is in relation to an expedition made up in Labrador two years before Vespucci. This expedition was funded by Richard Ameryk, so the new land was named after him. I gave a much better explanation on the first pageSpaceman_Spiff said:No, actually we were both wrong. Amerigo Vespucci who was an Italian explorer (my bad)who explored what we today consider the South American continent between 1497-1502 and who was the first to say it was not the West Indies. German cartographers Martin Waldseemuller and Matthias Ringmann were actually the ones who named the continent after Vespucci using the latin version of his name but the feminine form of it. In 1538, another German, Gerand Mercater, used it to name the North American continent in his map. Sorry, no Welsh involved.Sigel said:Wrong, it was most likely named after Welsh businessman Richard Ameryk. If it were named after Vespucci it would be called Vespucciland or some other derivationPallindromemordnillap said:It named after an Italian map maker name Amerigo Vispucci(sp?), who made the first map of what was considered the "New World" and it showed the continents of North and South America. It wasn't geographically accurate in the least. He was considered the first to do it though.bodyklok said:Who was America named after? (This is a seriously tricky question, just so your forewarned)![]()
because in soviet russia, communism is red!Wadders said:How did communism get the association with red? I've always wondered that...
HerrBobo said:What remarkable feat did the French Cavalry achieve during France's war in Holland? 1794-5
Who was the last king of Rome?
Amerigo Vespucci.shadowgaunt said:Wasn't it named after someone named Amerigo?Pallindromemordnillap said:I suspect it may be the Egyptians. When they had rulers they made no distinction between male and female, the word Pharaoh was used on both. Admittedly some of the women Pharoah (Hatepshut at least) wore a false beard though...bodyklok said:How did Catherine the Great die? Iz can't remember.
EDIT: Oh, and I'd always wondered. Which was the first country or culture (In recorded history) to have a female leader?
Who was America named after? (This is a seriously tricky question, just so your forewarned)
I can't remember first/last name or other facts about the guy.
Agreed- If you talk to people from other countries, our histories kinda don't match up. Like here in the USA, the Vietnam War is like a paragraph in our history books, or at least it was when I was in school. In fact, the biggest sections of my old history books are about the 13 colonies, and the War of Independence. After that, it's like, yeah, we did some other stuff.SsilverR said:History is written by the winners ... i have no doubt in my mind that "Official history" wasn't written the way it really happened but for the writers benifit
Sigel said:I prefer to trust my sources over wikipediaPallindromemordnillap said:"shrug" Wikipedia would like to disagree with you.Sigel said:No, the first recorded use of the word America is in relation to an expedition made up in Labrador two years before Vespucci. This expedition was funded by Richard Ameryk, so the new land was named after him. I gave a much better explanation on the first pageSpaceman_Spiff said:No, actually we were both wrong. Amerigo Vespucci who was an Italian explorer (my bad)who explored what we today consider the South American continent between 1497-1502 and who was the first to say it was not the West Indies. German cartographers Martin Waldseemuller and Matthias Ringmann were actually the ones who named the continent after Vespucci using the latin version of his name but the feminine form of it. In 1538, another German, Gerand Mercater, used it to name the North American continent in his map. Sorry, no Welsh involved.Sigel said:Wrong, it was most likely named after Welsh businessman Richard Ameryk. If it were named after Vespucci it would be called Vespucciland or some other derivationPallindromemordnillap said:It named after an Italian map maker name Amerigo Vispucci(sp?), who made the first map of what was considered the "New World" and it showed the continents of North and South America. It wasn't geographically accurate in the least. He was considered the first to do it though.bodyklok said:Who was America named after? (This is a seriously tricky question, just so your forewarned)![]()
It doesnt make sense to me because how often do people die running marathons and he was a professional runner surely he would have to run distances like that for a living.lostclause said:I learnt it that he ran to sparta to get help. They refused because they were in the middle of a celebration for Apollo so he ran back to Athens and dropped dead there.Pallindromemordnillap said:It was (supposedly) that Greek, Pheididipus or something typical like that. He had to go tell the Athenians that the battle of Marathon had been won, so ran all the way to the city, then all the way back to the beach at Marathon to tell the army commander the return message. its rumoured he dropped dead upon returningDeadpoolsbrain said:Who ran the first Marathon and why?
Always loved this guy's name.
It doesn't really make sense otherwise, why would you kill yourself running when there's no danger?
he ran the marathon of twenty seven miles or so to tell them they had won. he ran and told the commander by just shout "NIKE" meaning "victory" that's how my old text book tells it.Pallindromemordnillap said:It was (supposedly) that Greek, Pheididipus or something typical like that. He had to go tell the Athenians that the battle of Marathon had been won, so ran all the way to the city, then all the way back to the beach at Marathon to tell the army commander the return message. its rumoured he dropped dead upon returningDeadpoolsbrain said:Who ran the first Marathon and why?
Always loved this guy's name.
Yes! Well done!Deadpoolsbrain said:Not sure who was the first to get killed in an F1 race, but the first driver was Guiseppe Farina?HerrBobo said:Who was the first F1 World Champoin?
Who was the first F1 driver to be killed at an F1 race?
No Goolgling! lol
I didn't google I asked my dad in an e-mail lol.
That's why he said non-contigous, but the largest empire actually was the mongol empire.Malicious said:D.C. said:Yup 1/4 of the world... makes me proud to be British..... sometimes.Deadpoolsbrain said:Britain?D.C. said:Yup the biggest contiguos empire... how about non-contiguous?Deadpoolsbrain said:The mongol empire.D.C. said:Heres a new question what was the biggest (contiguous) Empire in History?
Population or land mass?
Actually there is a BIG difference between an empire and a colonial empire,as the most advanced and large empire was the roman empire,since all the population was romanised and answered to one government. A colonial empire is basically 50 men with guns saying they control a continent, and shooting the indigent people. In the roman empire they had legions and police in every area they controlled,same with the Ottoman empire,in the 18th century (ish) europeans went around the world proclaiming someone elses teritory as their own,thats colonialism,but yeah the British colonial empire were the largest in the world
Pallindromemordnillap said:"Authorities on Amerigo Vespucci" by Frederick Albion Ober, library.thinkquest.org, geography.about.com, and answers.yahoo would also like to disagree with you.Sigel said:I prefer to trust my sources over wikipediaPallindromemordnillap said:"shrug" Wikipedia would like to disagree with you.Sigel said:No, the first recorded use of the word America is in relation to an expedition made up in Labrador two years before Vespucci. This expedition was funded by Richard Ameryk, so the new land was named after him. I gave a much better explanation on the first pageSpaceman_Spiff said:No, actually we were both wrong. Amerigo Vespucci who was an Italian explorer (my bad)who explored what we today consider the South American continent between 1497-1502 and who was the first to say it was not the West Indies. German cartographers Martin Waldseemuller and Matthias Ringmann were actually the ones who named the continent after Vespucci using the latin version of his name but the feminine form of it. In 1538, another German, Gerand Mercater, used it to name the North American continent in his map. Sorry, no Welsh involved.Sigel said:Wrong, it was most likely named after Welsh businessman Richard Ameryk. If it were named after Vespucci it would be called Vespucciland or some other derivationPallindromemordnillap said:It named after an Italian map maker name Amerigo Vispucci(sp?), who made the first map of what was considered the "New World" and it showed the continents of North and South America. It wasn't geographically accurate in the least. He was considered the first to do it though.bodyklok said:Who was America named after? (This is a seriously tricky question, just so your forewarned)![]()
Pretty much that and Vietnam, but I personally don't agree because of Napoleon being a badass with is badass french army.Spaceman_Spiff said:A general question but why do so many people call the French cowards? Is it just because of WW2?
"History is written by the winners" is honestly kind of a useless cliché by now. History is written over and over and over. There is no such thing as "official history". There is only different interpretations of sources, be they primary or whatnot.SsilverR said:History is written by the winners ... i have no doubt in my mind that "Official history" wasn't written the way it really happened but for the writers benifit