Horrizon Zero Dawn worth a buy review

Recommended Videos

Avnger

Trash Goblin
Legacy
Apr 1, 2016
2,124
1,251
118
Country
United States
Bombiz said:
American Tanker said:
CritialGaming said:
Dude what even? You don't care, you only play 1st person shooters of the manliest of manly variety. Just let people enjoy things.
Though I have absolutely no interest in either game, I will say that because of this, I'd be far more likely to get Nier: Automata than I would Horizon: Zero Dawn. Mainly because the story of H: ZD is preachy as all hell.
Is it preachy I need the same way Mad Max Fury road was preachy? Also it's funny that people are calling this a feminist when their are anti-SJW defending it as the opposite.
https://www.youtube.com/shared?ci=r-D_elwYtT8
https://www.youtube.com/shared?ci=11_4Gq2Rvsk
800 brown-haired white male grizzled protagonist movies/games are not preachy at all, but introduce one strong female as the protagonist (or co-protagonist in Fury Road) and even Soviet Russia has nothing on the social engineering levels attained.
 

B-Cell_v1legacy

New member
Feb 9, 2016
2,102
0
0
erttheking said:
hanselthecaretaker said:
And you had to make it political.

On top of pulling the Relative Privation (AKA appeal to worse problems) fallacy.

https://www.logicallyfallacious.com/tools/lp/Bo/LogicalFallacies/155/Relative-Privation

OT: Man determined to not like a game doesn't like a game. For some reason, we all had to hear about it.

Only trying to convey a real world example of how pointless the biased One Angry Gamer article's perceived semantics are. They probably wouldn't have even had an article if Aloy was male. It ties into my earlier point that too much journalism today is marginal filler content churned out to meet quotas more so than presenting original, quality ideas.
 

B-Cell_v1legacy

New member
Feb 9, 2016
2,102
0
0
Avnger said:
Bombiz said:
American Tanker said:
CritialGaming said:
Dude what even? You don't care, you only play 1st person shooters of the manliest of manly variety. Just let people enjoy things.
Though I have absolutely no interest in either game, I will say that because of this, I'd be far more likely to get Nier: Automata than I would Horizon: Zero Dawn. Mainly because the story of H: ZD is preachy as all hell.
Is it preachy I need the same way Mad Max Fury road was preachy? Also it's funny that people are calling this a feminist when their are anti-SJW defending it as the opposite.
https://www.youtube.com/shared?ci=r-D_elwYtT8
https://www.youtube.com/shared?ci=11_4Gq2Rvsk
800 brown-haired white male grizzled protagonist movies/games are not preachy at all, but introduce one strong female as the protagonist (or co-protagonist in Fury Road) and even Soviet Russia has nothing on the social engineering levels attained.

Yeah, I often wonder if human beings were able to live for centuries rather than mere decades if we'd ever overcome such immense and repeated levels of stupidity. Or maybe it would be worse.
 
Feb 7, 2016
728
0
0
What's your logic with just taking everything this guy says blindly?

Do you have other reviewers that have said the same thing (without googling for some now that I'm asking), or are you just constantly regurgitating everything this guy has to say because it fuels your biases about games you're not already excited about?

Reviews are very tough to write. You either end up too objective (which provides little information and can be seen as a borderline ad) or you can be too subjective.

And even when you do hit a "sweet spot", it will not make everyone happy.

The idea with reviews is to see multiple, from different perspectives and different conclusions, and then use that information.

When was the last "generic open world game" that you played anyway? Or do you just get reviews that only confirm your preconceived notions so you can stand with your dick and never touch one?
 

B-Cell_v1legacy

New member
Feb 9, 2016
2,102
0
0
I know people who hate feminism but love Fury Road. That speaks volumes.

This whole agenda/identity politics crap has gone way too far. I think the information age has kinda came back around to bite humanity in the ass a bit; we just aren't doing a very good job of managing it all.


I suppose chalk it up to insecurities established through generations of social norms. Whenever something is perceived as outside the "norm", all hell beaks loose. It shouldn't have to be that way. We might as well all be robots if it were the case. Or go back to hunting/gathering and be content to leave it all at that.
 

Hawki

Elite Member
Legacy
Mar 4, 2014
9,651
2,183
118
Country
Australia
Gender
Male
Ezekiel said:
I also believe Rey from Star Wars wouldn't have been called a feminist misogynist Mary Sue Marty Stu nearly as much if she was male. There's a long history of overpowered and overly capable male heroes in movies, much like males in games.
I agree with you to an extent, but for instance, Anakin in the prequels is the strongest Jedi around (least by Episode III), but while no-one has an issue with his power, they do have an issue with his personality. Funnily enough, Rey is the opposite for me - I do find her a Mary Sue in as much as her powers become so great so fast, but as a character (e.g. personality), I find her quite likable).

Of course, this is Star Wars, so fans will always find something to complain about.
 

Laughing Man

New member
Oct 10, 2008
1,715
0
0
He is best reviewer currently and say things professional reviewers will lose the job if they point out those flaws. I dont always agree with him for example his Doom review was terrible and complain about why its like old doom.
The best reviewer currently... the guy doing the video in the link is the best video game reviewer currently? Well skipping the uming and uhing that he constantly doe throughout his reviews, the off hand bollock laiden statements that mean nothing and moving straight on to two very key statements that render his reviewing critique as next to worthless.

'If you're a typical shallow consoler gamer'
'These games play you you don't play them'

What this guy has done is instead of reviewing the game purely on IT'S merits or FLAWS he has allowed his own pre conceived opinions of a). Console games and b). Console gamers to cloud his entire review and frankly that doesn't make him the best reviewer currently, that makes him a pretty piss poor game reviewer.

Of course their is also a vague and over powering wiff, of I am giving a poor review to something everyone else is reviewing highly that seems to be a constant theme throughout the video as he tries to mention how others have reviewed it well at every opportunity he can find.

Jim Sterling gave the game a 9.5/10 and we can all guess how much of a fuck he gives about keeping the publishers happy.
 

Bombiz

New member
Apr 12, 2010
577
0
0
Ezekiel said:
Phoenixmgs said:
Ezekiel said:
The last Super Bunnyhop video I watched was the critical close-up of MGS3. He spent so much of the beginning randomly shitting on MGS2 that I stopped caring about the qualities of the game the video was actually about. So I didn't get far into that video. He probably didn't have much to say that I wasn't already aware of.
It's always about popularity with those YouTubers.
I don't think he would've have done a video where he talks about Rainbow six siege positively then
 

stroopwafel

Elite Member
Jul 16, 2013
3,031
357
88
Athennesi said:
No clear structure or thorough analysis on sound design/music ( compare it with ACG)
I don't watch many youtubers but ACG is one I regularly watch. He has keen observations on games that are both meticulous and precise but without having that air of pretentiousness that other more informative youtubers have. But even they are still better than all that uninformative fanboy trash.

Espescially ACG's 'walking the walk' in which he goes through the game with a fine comb is one I always really enjoy.

 

Athennesi

New member
Jul 28, 2016
69
0
0
stroopwafel said:
Athennesi said:
No clear structure or thorough analysis on sound design/music ( compare it with ACG)
I don't watch many youtubers but ACG is one I regularly watch. He has keen observations on games that are both meticulous and precise but without having that air of pretentiousness that other more informative youtubers have. But even they are still better than all that uninformative fanboy trash.

Espescially ACG's 'walking the walk' in which he goes through the game with a fine comb is one I always really enjoy.

Love that series. When it comes to talking about sounds, world, visual detail, ACG is at his best. An hour of this passes so fast.
 

Neverhoodian

New member
Apr 2, 2008
3,831
0
0
Ezekiel said:
Phoenixmgs said:
Ezekiel said:
The last Super Bunnyhop video I watched was the critical close-up of MGS3. He spent so much of the beginning randomly shitting on MGS2 that I stopped caring about the qualities of the game the video was actually about. So I didn't get far into that video. He probably didn't have much to say that I wasn't already aware of.
Huh? There were just a few minor quips about MGS2 in that video. He likes the entire MGS series I believe and did a video about how awesome MGS2 is.
He kept shitting on MGS2 in order to make MGS3 look better, using worthless comparisons. When I reviewed Max Payne 3, I didn't disparage the previous games, which I find inferior, because it's not relevant. He wouldn't have done it if those criticisms weren't popular opinion. It's always about popularity with those YouTubers.
I'm sorry, but I simply can't sit idly by and watch you misrepresent Noodle Senpai like this.

If anything, his (admittedly arty-farty pretentious) take on MGS2 as a brilliant post-modern deconstruction of the medium is far more forgiving than your typical review of the game. His comparisons in the MGS3 close-up were to illustrate how different the design philosophies were for the two games (at least, that's how I interpreted it).
 

Neverhoodian

New member
Apr 2, 2008
3,831
0
0
Ezekiel said:
I didn't misrepresent anything. I'm talking about what I saw in his MGS3 video. His MGS2 video is another matter. It was to illustrate what MGS2 did badly and what MGS3 did better, in his mind.
Fair enough. That said, just because someone points out the flaws in a product doesn't necessarily mean they're "shitting on it." I'm a huge Star Wars nerd, yet I'll readily acknowledge that I have my share of gripes with it, even the hallowed original trilogy. Also, it makes sense to me to compare sequels to previous entries in a well established story-driven franchise, particularly when it has fairly overt references to previous narratives.
 

cleric of the order

New member
Sep 13, 2010
546
0
0
Bombiz said:
Is it preachy I need the same way Mad Max Fury road was preachy? Also it's funny that people are calling this a feminist when their are anti-SJW defending it as the opposite.
it was return of kings and only them who were up on the mad max
>andy
can't tolerate that guy, he's neither entertaining or really interesting either
>rags
never heard of the fella, but he features top hats and C so he's likely boring.
Those folks aren't so much Representative of any community because the community itself is like herding cats.


Avnger said:
800 brown-haired white male grizzled protagonist movies/games are not preachy at all, but introduce one strong female as the protagonist (or co-protagonist in Fury Road) and even Soviet Russia has nothing on the social engineering levels attained.
well it isn't.
what the fuck is it preaching? target audience? being cheap on character modelers? or that AAA is bland?
all of those statements are true but it's not really something you can push.

Also i wouldn't really call her much of a character, let alone assign a gender to it
>you live in a shit world where people die like flies.
>freedom is clearly more important let's die in the desert and waste resources.
doesn't make sense to me but I'm here for the cars and explosions.

but yeah, return of kings is stupid, they're hardcore traditionalists obsessed with men being feminized it permeates their entire pick up artist glass or something

Ezekiel said:
I also believe Rey from Star Wars wouldn't have been called a feminist misogynist Mary Sue Marty Stu nearly as much if she was male. There's a long history of overpowered and overly capable male heroes in movies, much like males in games.
i mean she won't be if she was it was the mary sue that was dropping it.
but she would be a marty stew either way, the whole character was asspull after asspull
I mean i'll let things slide, but there's a difference between, untrained unyoung person and say fucking navi seal who basically uses one of these small sets of skills that are related to the job which was pre-established.
there's a reason why people point to luke and that's because you have a dork who is unskilled at the force at an age where he ought not to be to learn and you can see him strain to become competent.
Rey is like bam, bam bam i can do all this shit now, it sort of saps it for me, I'd of been fine if they didn't sort of pop the dramatic bubble for me.
 

Phoenixmgs_v1legacy

Muse of Fate
Sep 1, 2010
4,691
0
0
Ezekiel said:
He kept shitting on MGS2 in order to make MGS3 look better, using worthless comparisons. When I reviewed Max Payne 3, I didn't disparage the previous games, which I find inferior, because it's not relevant. He wouldn't have done it if those criticisms weren't popular opinion. It's always about popularity with those YouTubers.
I actually watched the MGS3 video for the first time last night as I've never seen it just due to it being one of his longest videos even though I love the MGS series. I just saw him making comparisons with how they were different with regards to stuff like codec messages and how MGS3 ends with a huge setpiece. MGS2 definitely had an over-reliance on codec messages. I think most people that played MGS2 didn't know what the S3 plan really was due to skipping that long ass codec message at the end. And for the few times he did "shit on it", it was more with love than anything. Any MGS fan knows there's flaws (it is Kojima after all) but either loves the games more for them or just sorta hand-waves them away. The one thing I don't like about MGS3 is that the Shagohod makes no sense at all from a physics standpoint.

Neverhoodian said:
If anything, his (admittedly arty-farty pretentious) take on MGS2 as a brilliant post-modern deconstruction of the medium is far more forgiving than your typical review of the game. His comparisons in the MGS3 close-up were to illustrate how different the design philosophies were for the two games (at least, that's how I interpreted it).
MGS2 sorta pulled a Bioshock well before Bioshock, and it did it much better IMO. If anything MGS2 is more poignant now than at release with how much misinformation is out there, especially with regards to politics, and how much the average person believes falsehoods to be fact all due to mainly social media and an overload of information. Even when I originally played MGS2 on release, I was like The Patriots make a damn good point.
 

cleric of the order

New member
Sep 13, 2010
546
0
0
Ezekiel said:
Luke had some bullshit moments too. Like, how they put him in the seat of a military fighter craft that he had never piloted before.
but they did introduce him as having been a fair pilot before, for all we know the x-wing is a space t-34 with a simple system that allows any old person to fly it and given it's a rebellion i lean towards that as an explanation as to why it is the main fighter over the A or B or K wing along with economical reasons.
from what i remember he doesn't actually do anything really all that special in the seat either, aside from the force shit at the end. then again the trench run was pretty skillful.
simply put the suspension of disbelief isn't affected.
We don't know the rules of this, we know he was a pilot, he drives them into town, he knows a bit about starships i remember han barking at him for back seat driving and now far away he's piloting another craft.
one doesn't have to strain.

but people don't just morph psychic powers out of their asses and giving a sense of progression of training and mysticism helps close that gap.
especially when that character is also super good with machines and fighting and can do things as the plot allows it.
you don't see that as much with luke.

In the trilogy, he learns much of his power on his own, like Rey. Obi-Wan never taught him how to force pull objects, yet he pulls a lightsaber out of the snow.
again that's something movie teaching can gloss over, we did have time skips during his early training, also he was super fucking bad with it.
Trying to pull in the light-saber took noticeable stress early on. it wasn't as if he just learned the skill and mastered it moments before, it was very weak and it doesn't break the suspended disbelief membrane

Rey's progression was definitely fast, but it wasn't that absurd.
it was expedient enough for people to hone in on it, luke was stretched out of 3 films, a lot of it happening off screen or summarized quickly but they did devote a fair amount of time showing he was indeed struggling. the key point is logically it was space enough that these leaps made sense.
First episode he's still getting it, most stressful thing he does is learn not to overly rely on his senses - the trench run, the training droid.
then he gets more power, begins to affect the world - lifting shit, understanding his mind
then he ends up becoming the great warrior monk, even then he wasn't all that strong in the vadar fight.

The long and the short of it is that there was enough gaps between the stories that we could fill in the blanks, imagine the personal training that goes by, we aren't there and given seconds to understand that a person is achieving something that it takes years to do if you follow the story cannon.

even little orphan annie himself who was some sort of protege was unable to just pop up with all these fucking force powers because plot, though he did have mild force clairvoyance. Hell a lot of folks thought the character was bullshit myself included. this fella has the ability to build robots and complex machinery, slave job or not the kid is still a kid but it was clearly Lukas writing by convenience and the rest of the movie was bad so it didn't stand out as much. A turd in a latrine is not nearly as noticeable as a turd on a porcelain floor.
come to think of it she reminds me quite a bit of that little stupid shit.


referring to the above post about here trials
I wonder how the first force users learned that they had those abilities, without anyone to teach them.
i suppose because it's space mysticism you had people begin to delve into it, train people and those people will meditate and become better. with a lot of different schools or classes of jedi until a jedi buddha arrives and teaches everyone the best way. it's like what siddharta said himself, the dharma doesn't just leave, people will always learn a way.
It's not that they just learned the stuff or you would have a bunch of untrained superjedi/sith on random worlds and even disney fucking the extended canon you don't see that stuff.
a strong amoral force sensitive can build an empire, they end up in the outrim, just get that knowledge shat on them form on high and you'd have noticeable empires crop up. but you don't really see that,
Hell if it was true and disincline wasn't really necessary it wasn't spirituality and connection to the heart beat of the world then we don't even see that in rey.
she doesn't seems like a mystical character, not enough to fool the portion of the audience who saw her way too powerful without drawbacks.
That bug eyed glare she has on most of the movie doesn't seem calm to me, he actions don't suspend my belief she is some sort of mystic savant it comes off that she just has these powers because she does.
no training
no discplin
no mystic magic mumbojumbo
no real reason.
it doesn't follow that she is this strong to me, just like anni

Might it have been the same as when Rey hears the voice of the storm trooper and then realizes she can manipulate his thoughts? At least her powers have a progression (a very fast progression), beginning with her discovery of the lightsaber and continuing when she meets Kylo Ren, and there are hints, like flashbacks and Obi-Wan speaking to her. It was a bit rough, but I'm hopeful that the sequel will make more sense of it.
people are suggesting she might be little orphan annie back in a new body and that scares me, we don't need more annie.
but yeah, jay jay did a hack-slap dash thing to charge people up for the next one wand disney is handing it to other people. it's clear her characterization and grow was hacked up for plot convenience for what amounts to a low brain action movie.
there is nothing wrong with being aware of that, she comes off as a mary sue, for good reason, they never really did much with her but use her as a vehicle to help advance them to a new set piece for plot and scene efficiency

I think it would have been worse to have another protagonist go through all the same trials that we already watched Luke go through. I'm hoping the sequels come up with new powers.
true but then again they are selling us episode 4...2. it's that sort of thing, rehashing wouldn't be the worst except it doesn't fit JarJar Abrams style. You could have tweaked things before it left the drawing board, Rey didn't even have to start at ground zero she could have been shown practicing this stuff, because a force artifacts' influence or it could have been she was being trained initially, change up her backstory a bit.
but it's clear, she's the daughter of one of the main characters from the last movies, who may or may not be darth vader or some shyamalan tier twist.
and none of it matted anyway because hype.
any criticisms i could levy again will be washed away because well member berries nostiliga and fanboying
 

theevilgenius60

New member
Jun 28, 2011
475
0
0
Hawki said:
Ezekiel said:
I also believe Rey from Star Wars wouldn't have been called a feminist misogynist Mary Sue Marty Stu nearly as much if she was male. There's a long history of overpowered and overly capable male heroes in movies, much like males in games.
I agree with you to an extent, but for instance, Anakin in the prequels is the strongest Jedi around (least by Episode III), but while no-one has an issue with his power, they do have an issue with his personality. Funnily enough, Rey is the opposite for me - I do find her a Mary Sue in as much as her powers become so great so fast, but as a character (e.g. personality), I find her quite likable).

Of course, this is Star Wars, so fans will always find something to complain about.
The reason no one calls Anakin out as a Marty Stu is because we already know his flaw. He's the future Lord Vader, so making him a heads and shoulders above hero makes it sting more. I'm with you on the personality thing though. Like a block of wood
 

Lightspeaker

New member
Dec 31, 2011
934
0
0
American Tanker said:
CritialGaming said:
Dude what even? You don't care, you only play 1st person shooters of the manliest of manly variety. Just let people enjoy things.
Though I have absolutely no interest in either game, I will say that because of this, I'd be far more likely to get Nier: Automata than I would Horizon: Zero Dawn. Mainly because the story of H: ZD is preachy as all hell.
Personally my take-away from that article is that I now want BOTH Horizon:Zero Dawn and Nier:Automata; so I guess it failed in its point to a certain extent.

It'd be highly irresponsible of me to buy both considering my existing backlog...but I might just have to buy both.
 

deadish

New member
Dec 4, 2011
694
0
0
American Tanker said:
CritialGaming said:
Dude what even? You don't care, you only play 1st person shooters of the manliest of manly variety. Just let people enjoy things.
Though I have absolutely no interest in either game, I will say that because of this, I'd be far more likely to get Nier: Automata than I would Horizon: Zero Dawn. Mainly because the story of H: ZD is preachy as all hell.
Based on the reviews and streams I have seen ... story doesn't seem to be it's strong point - at least the presentation of it; dialogue is ... awkward. Naughty Dog, Guerrilla Games is not, when it comes to storytelling.

If I get it, I will be getting it for the gameplay and visuals - the latter of which I have to say is top notch in it's genre.
 

Zombie Proof

New member
Nov 28, 2015
359
0
0
Ezekiel said:
Phoenixmgs said:
Ezekiel said:
The last Super Bunnyhop video I watched was the critical close-up of MGS3. He spent so much of the beginning randomly shitting on MGS2 that I stopped caring about the qualities of the game the video was actually about. So I didn't get far into that video. He probably didn't have much to say that I wasn't already aware of.
Huh? There were just a few minor quips about MGS2 in that video. He likes the entire MGS series I believe and did a video about how awesome MGS2 is.
He kept shitting on MGS2 in order to make MGS3 look better, using worthless comparisons. When I reviewed Max Payne 3, I didn't disparage the previous games, which I find inferior, because it's not relevant. He wouldn't have done it if those criticisms weren't popular opinion. It's always about popularity with those YouTubers.
Oh snap, you wrote a review of Max Payne 3? Hook a ninja up with a link. I dig reading your thoughts on shit.
 

Zombie Proof

New member
Nov 28, 2015
359
0
0
Ezekiel said:
hanselthecaretaker said:
Only trying to convey a real world example of how pointless the biased One Angry Gamer article's perceived semantics are. They probably wouldn't have even had an article if Aloy was male. It ties into my earlier point that too much journalism today is marginal filler content churned out to meet quotas more so than presenting original, quality ideas.
I also believe Rey from Star Wars wouldn't have been called a feminist misogynist Mary Sue Marty Stu nearly as much if she was male. There's a long history of overpowered and overly capable male heroes in movies, much like males in games.
[/quote]
Actually, that was my biggest issue with Dr. Strange. The Marty was so strong in that joint I expected his last name to be McFly.