Actually, it wasn't. mysecondlife and Zetion were pretty bang on about what to eat and what not to eat to lose weight, though I would actually recommend getting rid of all grains myself. Some aren't as bad as what's used to make the bread you buy in the store, but it's still not great for managing blood glucose, and there's no nutritional value you can't get elsewhere in your diet much more efficiently. Actually re-reading x EvilErmine x's post, they're not totally wrong either. There's no evolutionary reason to consume three meals a day. You can consume less or more and be fine. If you're eating the right types of food you will actually stay full a lot longer since your blood sugar isn't crashing two hours later and the fat content will give you plenty of energy to carry you for hours. So eating when you're hungry you may find that you eat less, or at least less frequently.Gamblerjoe said:This is all incorrect.
The only person you quoted who was actually incorrect about anything was Mallefunction when they said not to avoid carbs. Sure you don't want to avoid all carbs. vegetables and the occasional piece of fruit are fine. But you do want to avoid sugar, starch, and grains if you want to lose weight and be healthy. But he was right about not limiting fat intake. It's what will give you good energy throughout the day and leave you feeling full longer. It's also required for the proper development and functioning of the human brain and immune system. Limiting fat is only hurting you.
I can assure you that limiting carbohydrate intake is not some "crap people made up to sell books." Though eating as many carbs in the form of grains that the USDA recommends IS crap that they made up to sell you the grains they heavily subsidize.