How long does it take you to read a book?

Recommended Videos

mattaui

New member
Oct 16, 2008
689
0
0
I'd say read a book as fast as it takes you to read it, and don't let the speed at which others read determine whether or not you're 'a reader' or make you feel like somehow you're reading too slowly. Some books I read quickly, others more slowly, some I don't finish, some I can't put down. Yes, I know people who go through books like a soap opera junkie with a DVR, but that's never been how I liked to read.

Different authors have different effective reading levels, too. It's not just page count or even word count, so that tends to make a 'wpm' measure of reading especially useless.
 

Smertnik

New member
Apr 5, 2010
1,172
0
0
Depends. If it's a book I'm very interested in and I have the time, then I usually sit down and read it in one go (or two). If it's not that suspenseful I take it with me and keep reading it in the train which (obviously) takes considerably longer.
 

qeinar

New member
Jul 14, 2009
562
0
0
i usually only read books i know i will love at a time where i have good time to read, so i basicly finish them in a day, 2 days. read harry potter 7 in one sittining. Also read fight club in one day and a diary, which where both good books. actually i've probably read most of the harry potter books in a day or two. all the dan brown books in 2 days also.. i usually can't be bothered using over a week on a book.

I'm probably a bit extreme when i do something, i don't watch tv while i read and if i'm into a series i watch that really fast.

Also i like crime novels where it gets hard to remember details if you do it in manny sitting or use over a week on them.
 

Continuity

New member
May 20, 2010
2,053
0
0
I've been reading a lot less lately, but it depends on how much time I allocate to reading (obviously I guess). TBH the internet and computer games are taking up more and more of my time lately.
 

mattaui

New member
Oct 16, 2008
689
0
0
Jonluw said:
I don't think it has anything to do with reading speed. If this: http://www.readingsoft.com is to be believed, I read at slightly above average speed (263 wpm) with above average reading comprehension (82%).
I'll also note that a website trying to sell reading comprehension software might be a little biased in making sure that you feel compelled to try their product. :)
 

Professor Idle

New member
Aug 21, 2009
302
0
0
Takes me a long time, developed this really annoying habit of scanning over the previous paragraph because I feel like I may have missed something when I was reading it. It's getting annoying.
 

satanslawer123

New member
Aug 6, 2009
207
0
0
one or two days if its a 500 page book it just depends on how into the book i am like the harry dresden series i can read one of those books within a day and a half.
 

Whateveralot

New member
Oct 25, 2010
953
0
0
Would take me about 3 years. Not continuously reading, of course. I just hate reading so much that I'll even procastinate on books I want to / need to read.
 

Raognerrrm

New member
Apr 2, 2011
396
0
0
Abandon4093 said:
Raognerrrm said:
It'd take me about 3 hours to read a 500 page novel.
Note this is on average. If it's really good (like Ian Irvine or David Eddings), maybe 90 minutes. If it's really bad (like Jane Austen), around 5 hours.
According to the test I got 1054 wpm and 100%.
So I guess you could say I read fast.
But then I'm not really a normal person, so that's not really a good indicator of what is.
LOL

Alright Sheldon.

The average wps and comprehension is somewhere around 250 with 70%.

Wikipedia said:
The World Championship Speed Reading Competition stresses reading comprehension as critical, and that the top contestants typically read around 1,000 to 2,000 words per minute with approximately 50% comprehension or above, the world champion is Anne Jones with 4,700 words per minute with 67% comprehension. The 10,000 word/min claimants have yet to reach this level.
So yea, get yourself down to one of those tests. With a comp of 100% at that speed. You'd surely be granted a spot in the Guinness book of world records.

.... Seriously, what is it about the internet that makes people want to lie so much. About the most pointless things too.

I believe the phrase, pics or it didn't happen is somewhat fitting?
Now I'm confused.
It's hardly a a complex test, and by no means completely accurate (what with having to click the stop button and all. And I did guess a question).
If you bothered to read (and comprehend) the subject matter on the site, one of the questions was the percentile of people who could read 1000 wpm. The answer was 1%, with an average of 85% comprehension. Seeing as I guessed a question, that's only 0.5 more questions correct for my range. Hardly a reason to call me a liar.

Those tests you mentioned would be completely different, probably much longer, about a more random topic, and much more specific questions. Comparing them to an easy test like this that isn't long at all, and already a topic I know a bit about, and questions that you'd know the answer for if you just skim-read it, just doesn't work.
For example, if someone gets full marks on a high-school maths exam, that does not mean they are automatically qualified to do well in the maths olympiad.

As for pictures...
I've closed the tabs that held the subject matter, and if I were to do it again, I'd already know the material and answers. Not exactly the most accurate.
 

spartan231490

New member
Jan 14, 2010
5,186
0
0
Abandon4093 said:
spartan231490 said:
Abandon4093 said:
spartan231490 said:
I read a 500 page novel in a day. If it's slow going, I might have to finish it the next morning. According to your little test, I read a 273 wpm, with a 82% comprehension rate. I think that the comprehension rate is higher when I read novels because that test sequence was boring, and because I rarely forget much of anything that's happened in a book, even if I read it years ago.

This is exactly why I try to find books that are almost 1000 pages long, and that are part of a series, that way I can be entertained for a while. Still, it never takes me long, I read a book series that was over 10,000 pages long in less than 2 weeks.

To answer your question, yes this happens because I sit down to read the book for hours at a time and actually read the book for that entire time(most of it, I occasionally stop to think about the book). If this isn't just some bad joke, and you really read like that, you either need to find a better book, or you need to go get checked out for ADD or ADHD.
No need to be a dick about it. Some people just read at different speeds.
I'm not being a dick, did you read the OP? If you can't even sit still and focus long enough to read more than a handful of pages of a book, without zoning out and losing your place several times, either the book is incredibly boring, or you have some kind of attention problem. I suspect he was likely exaggerating, in which case: whatever, but if he was serious, then he should probably go talk to a doctor. But what do I know, I'm just a dick.
Wise words.

ADHD is the most bogus diagnosis out there. I could probably go and get diagnosed with it.

'Hmm, he's not paying as much attention to this boring subject as I'd like him to..... ADHD. Here's a vat of Ritalin. Go shove it down his throat and live a stress free life not engaging with your child like a real parent because he's been tranquilised. But don't worry, you have a diagnosis, so no one can call you a bad parent.'

Believe it or not, not everybody is suited to reading. A lot of people like to be more active and sedentary activity such as reading bores them. Even if they're interested in the book they probably think of the activity as a waste of time. Even if only subconsciously. Some may grow into it, others probably never will. It's not a character defect, it's not a lack of attention span. It's just that specific activity isn't for them.

I've known people who've never read a book in their life, but can sit for 5 or 6 hours putting an engine back together, gluing and painting hand crafted models or solving number puzzles. Hardly indicative of someone who can't focus.

Different strokes for different blokes.
Foolish words. Yes, ADHD and ADD are overdiagnosed, but some people really do have them. I know a kid who literally couldn't sit still for more than 5 minutes, he was failing all his classes, he couldn't read more than a page of text, and that would take him an hour. He was diagnosed and treated and now, he can pay attention at school, he's a solid B student, he loves reading almost as much as I do, and he can actually talk to you and have a conversation without being distracted by the color of paint on the wall. Now he had it about as bad as you can get, but there are a lot of people who really do need treatment to function properly. Most, if not all, minor cases are actually just shitty parenting, but the moderate and severe cases, like where you can't even read 5 pages of text without being distracted by nothing, need treatment.

As for some people being bored by sedentary activities: I have yet to see a kid who couldn't sit through their favorite movie. and the OP didn't say he disliked reading, in fact I got the opposite impression from the fact that he tries so hard, he described how hard it was for him to focus on it for even a full page. That's not a lack of interest, or even a dislike of being sedentary(if such a thing even exists), that is a lack of the ability to focus.

I dislike some movies and some books, I can still sit through them if I try, and i'm not distracted and staring into space every paragraph. I can watch an entire shitty movie, or read a chapter of a shitty book in one sitting. Am I super? able to focus well beyond and above what the average person can? I think not, just ask any guy who's ever been to a movie he can't stand with is GF. It's not that hard to focus, it's just not entertaining.

Once again, just to be extra clear: The OP never said he disliked reading, he said he was physically incapable of focusing on it like most people. That's a problem. If he just dislikes reading and was exaggerating about the details of how hard it was for him to focus, then yeah, he probably just doesn't like reading. If he was being serious, then he described the second worst case of ADD/ADHD I have ever heard of, and more than half-a-dozen of my family work in the medical industry, and a close family friend of mine(Not the kid I talked about earlier) has moderate to severe ADHD.
 

Instinct Blues

New member
Jun 8, 2008
508
0
0
It all depends on how interested in the book I am because if its a book I need to read for school it could take weeks. If its a book that I'm reading for pleasure it can only take me a few days to read through it all. If that site you provided is to be believed I read at about 223 wpm (right around average) with 91% comprehension (which is way above average for my wpm)so I'm about right in the same boat with you OP.
 

Korolev

No Time Like the Present
Jul 4, 2008
1,853
0
0
How long does it usually take me to finish a book? Depends on the book!

Most of the books I get are about 300-400 pages long and they are non-fiction. If the book is written well and I find the subject very interesting, then I'll probably manage to finish it within 3 or 4 days. I can spend many hours just reading, and I read fast.

If the book is written poorly or I find it uninteresting it can take up to a year as I just can't bring myself to read it for long stretches of time. I have managed to read a 350~ book within about a day - I was stuck on a plane and in an airport for most of that time and I had little time to do anything else, and I was really interested in it (It's Rubicon by Tom Holland by the way. Brilliant book for fans of ancient history). Then again, I have had similarly sized books that I have NEVER finished because they were horribly written.

I have downed a Discworld novel in a day and I finished the first book of Hitch hiker's guide to the galaxy in about a day as well (again, pretty much reading any chance I could get).
 

LiraelG

New member
Jun 22, 2011
109
0
0
It depends on a number of things... The length of the book (obviously), the time I have to read it, how interesting the book is, how challenging/intellectual it is...

For example, a long children's book with a good story can take me a matter of hours, but these hours will span across several days as I find it difficult to sit still for hours on end. I like to be active. An adult's book of the same length with a good story but complex language can take slightly longer; it takes time to get my head around what's being said
 

Jonluw

New member
May 23, 2010
7,245
0
0
mattaui said:
Jonluw said:
I don't think it has anything to do with reading speed. If this: http://www.readingsoft.com is to be believed, I read at slightly above average speed (263 wpm) with above average reading comprehension (82%).
I'll also note that a website trying to sell reading comprehension software might be a little biased in making sure that you feel compelled to try their product. :)
Indeed.
I only included that there to make the point that I'm not dyslexic or anything, so I figured it wasn't horribly important how accurate it was. I didn't exactly go out of my way to find the best test out there. I googled 'reading speed test' and clicked the first link that appeared.
 

newdarkcloud

New member
Aug 2, 2010
452
0
0
I can go through interesting and entertaining books relatively quickly. It may take between 1-7 days depending on my schedule.

If it's a boring book that I'm only reading because I have to, it may take a little longer (2-3 weeks). Even then, it's mostly working up the willpower to actually read the book.
 

FinalHeart95

New member
Jun 29, 2009
2,164
0
0
Depends. Huck Finn took me extraordinarily long to read, and I eventually even gave up and went to sparknotes. And I NEVER do sparknotes except as supplemental stuff.

Of course, that's a book for school. When I'm really enthralled in a book, I can finish it in a day or two. For examples of this, see the last Harry Potter or Odd Thomas. Unfortunately, right now, my gaming habit is getting in the way of my reading, so I'm reading about 0 books every month...
 

Fleischer

New member
Jan 8, 2011
218
0
0
Connor Lonske said:
Months. I'm still reading The Road by Cormac McCarthy, I'm been trying to finish it since late June. The book is like, 230 something pages long.
Most books take me a few days, if not weeks, but I ripped right through The Road. I was cover to cover in less than two days. But I definitely was in need of cheering up after getting through that masterpiece.
 

Fozza

New member
Jul 6, 2010
122
0
0
It really depends on what book it is. Took me like half a year to read Dragon Age: The Stolen Throne because I forgot it so often. However I think my record is 1.5 days, lay in the sofa for like 10 horus and read the last 4/5 of "the subtle knife". Otherwise two weeks is a pretty average time for me.
 

Amberella

Super Sailor Moon
Jan 23, 2010
1,188
0
0
Depends on what type of book it is. :p I'm a huge bookworm, and when I find a book I really get into it can take me just one day to finish. Although, you're talking to a girl who read 36 books in one summer. I used to get a new book every week. :)