if she is making her own footage, and she is not citing someone else's proofLifeCharacter said:Citing something is not part of the research process. It is part of generating academic work that results from your research. It is entirely possible to research something and not then go on to cite what you researched.NuclearKangaroo said:looking for proof is not part of the research process...
what?
what is exactly sustaining her arguments?
-150k dollarsLifeCharacter said:If being slightly lazy in gathering footage for her videos makes her a scam artist to you, good for you. I mean, it has absolutely nothing to do with her arguments or research but, what the hell, why not call her a scam artist just because you can?she was paid 150k to be lazy...
oh ok, shes a scam artist then
theres absolutely no way she comes out clean, almost every single scenario paints her as a scam artist one way or the other
-6 months between videos
-not playing the games herself
-using someone else's footage and not givign them credit for it
slightly lazy... SLIGHTLY
you dont know the meaning of that word
her arguments, oh, those are an entirely different matter that one can easily refute within 3 minutes and with time to spare
a gamer is a fan of video games, she is not a fan of video gamesLifeCharacter said:You can't imagine interpreting "I'm not a fan of video games" in a way that's not "I am not a gamer! I never play games! I'm a lying scam artist!"? She couldn't possibly mean that she's not a fan of the current state of video games, or gamer culture, or whatever. Nope, she means exactly what you want her to mean because fuck her, she criticized your precious hobby!https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gcPIu3sDkEw
"im not a fan of video games..."
"i would like to play video games, but i wouldnt want to go around shooting people and ripping out their heads its just gross..."
i cant imagine what goes through your mind, i cant imagine how can you to listen to that statement and not come to the conclusion that anita is not a fan of video games, that she is not a gamer
your argument is indefensible
if you are going by the broad definition of gamer, that is, that ANYBODY playing ANY game is a gamer, then thats problematic, a 80 year old granma that plays nothing but solitaire on her PC could be considered a gamer, but then again, how useful would be her input in a gaming discussion?
as for "I never play games!"
well, she said it herself
"i WOULD like to play video game"
as in, she DOESNT currently play video games, and her piss poor reasoning behind that
"i wouldnt want to go around shooting people and ripping out their heads its just gross..."
only futher proves how little she knows about video games, many of the video games she has critized in her, beyond laughable series of videos, such as mario, rogue legacy, ghouls and goblins, etc, feature almost no graphic violence, something that anybody with even the most BASIC knowledge of gaming should know
for instance, of my 200+ game collection, accross steam, gog and origin, roughly 1 third of them dont show any sort of blood, and this is comming from an adult gamer with obviously an inclination and the opportunity to buy M rated games
according to the ESRB
http://www.esrb.org/ratings/search.jsp
there are around 646375 with the E rating, and that isnt counting T and E+10
so this line here
"i would like to play video games, but i wouldnt want to go around shooting people and ripping out their heads its just gross..."
proves she is full of crap
circumstantial evidence is not enough to accuse someone of something, boy, courts must be full of shit thenLifeCharacter said:I didn't know evidence that was circumstantial at best was enough to justify slandering someone. You've yet to provide any actual evidence that she doesn't play the games she talks about, so should I just conclude that you have none and go about doing something productive or would you like to show that integrity you supposedly like so much and provide something beyond conspiracies and assumptions?i didnt know integrity and standards meant i couldnt draw my own conclusions based on the evidence present at the moment, thats a new one
also, her own words, circumstantial evidence
yeah you dont know the meaning of that either