As I write game reviews on my blog and I don't even have eight comments, this kind of hurts...
Man, I need a life.
Man, I need a life.
May I be so rude as to provide my own tip?Cecilthedarkknight_234 said:Hell read one of my reviews if you care to take look "shameless shelf promotion"
http://cecilsanimevisualnovelreview.blogspot.com/2011/06/review-of-clannad-visual-novel-true.html
http://cecilsanimevisualnovelreview.blogspot.com/2011/07/this-is-science-and-drpepper-review-of.html
So you requested that Yahtzee write this because you don't get enough truly entertainingly bad submissions?Susan Arendt said:Ayuh. Though the skill it's developed is more of an open-mouthed stare, followed by "You have got to be kidding me."Formica Archonis said:I thought it was Susan who handled the pitches and new submissions. Which explains her highly-practiced ability to say "Aw, hell no!"LTK_70 said:I think you just gave Steve Butts a heart attack.
In truth, the vast majority of the pitches I get are fairly ordinary. I reject about 96% of pitches I receive, but usually for very mundane reasons - it's not a good fit for the audience, it's something that's been done to death, we've already run something along those lines fairly recently, or the writer just isn't all that good. The jaw droppers are relatively few and far between, but they do certainly leave an impression.
But you forget that those 4 people are Modern Warfare contaminated gamer. Their understanding of the word perfect grammar is... perfkt.lacktheknack said:Um... Not to poke holes in your advice, but if you have about four people claiming that your writing is perfect, doesn't that mean that your writing isn't terrible enough?
59:58 of the video.Susan Arendt said:Tell you what - give this a listen. It'll provide some insight: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5ZqHoSrrS28 (Apologies for the audio, there were tech issues at the panel. This was the best we could get.)
The "Dum-Dums" (that's what they were called, if I recall) can be my on-disk DLC.Therumancer said:Sounds like a perfect match for the "Who Framed Roger Rabbit" liscence which is still rocking the box office. That whole little gag with the Yosemite Sam gun needs it's own game. You should probably submit this idea to Disney ASAP....Dastardly said:Plus also I have this idea for a game too. Its like a FPS but wait! When you shoot the player becomes the bullet and you can steer it to hit the target or other stuff! It will also has RPG elements so you can level up you're bullets with more speed or hats or sounds. It could even be an MMO!
Job, please!![]()
And there's the first expansion pack.cursedseishi said:I think you can improve this.
When you shoot and become the bullet, have a gauge that fills up over time from successful attacks and the like. When it's full you can trigger a slow-motion effect, gun-time if you will, that slows everything but you down.
This allows you to get a greater degree of accuracy and when you strike someone's head, you get a free turn in the turn-based battle that follows between you and their brain!
Loved this panel. My first-ever pitch was a surprisingly nerve-wracking affair, actually Googling how to pitch stuff, tossing my goofy-but-beloved idea out into the void, getting it rejected, writing it anyway just to get the idea out of my head, getting it un-rejected, and then boom one day it's on the internet... So listening to this panel really resonated with me, and I'm sorry I missed out on PAX.Susan Arendt said:Tell you what - give this a listen. It'll provide some insight: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5ZqHoSrrS28 (Apologies for the audio, there were tech issues at the panel. This was the best we could get.)
I have over the past year that was from a year ago bluntly put i have gotten better at doing it. The problem was I rambled on way to much since that was 300 hr game which had way to much info to convoy in 500 words or less. This would be like doing a in-depth review of fall-out 3/NV due to large amount of material. Fine I also accept your challenge.maninahat said:May I be so rude as to provide my own tip?Cecilthedarkknight_234 said:Hell read one of my reviews if you care to take look "shameless shelf promotion"
http://cecilsanimevisualnovelreview.blogspot.com/2011/06/review-of-clannad-visual-novel-true.html
http://cecilsanimevisualnovelreview.blogspot.com/2011/07/this-is-science-and-drpepper-review-of.html
That first review is nearly 2000 words. For a reviewer just starting out, you can't expect most people to follow a tract that long. Only the most well known reviewers would get away with something so wordy, and even then, they tend not to try. Roger Ebert, for example, writes to around 700 words - and that is far more than most reviewers get in columns or print. tvtropes.org, by comparison, restricts reviews to just 400 measly words. That does a great job of keeping reviews focused and easy to read. I recommend you limit yourself to a similar word count, just to train yourself to get to the point quickly.
But what if you can't express everything you want to say in just 400-500 words? Than you have no business being a reviewer. A good reviewer can even summarize their opinion in a single sentence. Try it!