Norithics said:
That said, the idea is worth discussing. I don't really feel like a Progressive ideology nor the public good is very well served when the outcome is identical to a Puritanical one.
Oh, it serves a progressive ideology just fine, but only because in recent years progressive ideology has become rather shockingly illiberal. It's just more evidence behind horseshoe theory -- extremists tend to be more like extremists from other ideologies than like the moderates from their own.
Norithics said:
I think it's very possible to serve shallow titillation and further the inclusivity of the medium writ large; you accomplish this by injecting more variety, not less.
The issue of course is that the same people who consider inclusivity/diversity to be the highest and most important good do not agree with that assessment -- they don't want to build their own things, they want to demand that things others build conform to their will, and they'll ruin you in the court of public opinion if you don't conform (if corporate, if individual they'll dox you and try to get you fired -- welcome to the internet).
mysecondlife said:
An indie game developer I have never heard of until today has $1M to throw around?
They made a ton off HuniePop, surprised you hadn't heard of them given the amount of controversy sprung up around that one -- it can best be described as visual novel dating sim meets Candy Crush done better (they had to censor it for Steam, and released an official uncensored patch on their Steam discussion board). Their current project is a cam girl studio sim. Neither is exactly my cup of tea (especially the J-pop music they seem to love for some ear-bleedingly bizarre reason), but I'm not going to tell anyone not to carry them, enjoy them, or whatever.
Dosbilliam said:
Edit: Not as bad as James Deen, but I'll let you research THAT one on your own.
The thing I find the most interesting about the Stoya/James Deen thing is the difference in reaction between this allegation and the rape of Cytherea.
Of course, I suspect that Stoya's allegation is more useful to a political narrative. Stoya accused an ex boyfriend of raping her, who is conveniently a white relatively wealthy pretty-boy porn star well known in feminist circles, and I don't think there's any evidence aside from the allegation itself to back it, is there (did she even approach the authorities?)? So he's unlikely to be charged with anything, which serves as convenient validation of rape culture.
Cytherea's case is different though -- her rape happened as part of a home invasion, she actually went to the police in short order (you know, while there was actual physical evidence of what happened), and the perpetrators (three black guys, late teens) were rounded up and charged with a laundry list of crimes related to the incident, including sexual assault (for which they will be tried as adults). Her case is somewhat less useful from a political standpoint, to the point that the sites that talk about Stoya's allegation typically said not a word about Cytherea's case. It didn't really get talked about much outside of porn circles at all (it got talked about in GG circles too, but mostly because Mercedes Carerra talked about it), especially by the feminist sites that are all over Stoya's allegation.
Sniper Team 4 said:
So...if I do buy the game from that Play-Asia website, will it work on my PS4? There's not region lock or anything right?
I don't think there is a region lock on the PS4.
DemomanHusband said:
Xtreme is a more cut-and-dry case, but that then leads back to the silly argument that a game designed around fanservice is bad in any sense of the word.
Butbutbut, don't you know that inch of exposed pixel skin on a female character makes other elements of the game intrinsically worse? In all seriousness, I've never been able to figure that one out. I've always considered fan service to be generally neutral as far as effecting quality -- as in it doesn't make a title better, but it also doesn't actively harm it somehow simply by being there. Trying to push creators who want it there to remove it is an entirely different story though.
weirdee said:
There used to be more room in the market, but they were literally shoved out of the pool by AAA practices, so the pool does seem to have a limit, and things will have to be swapped out for others unless the pool was expanded somehow, but there's an ongoing issue where any new space is immediately occupied by AAA after it becomes viable. It's not as cut and dried as it sounds. There is no motivation or room for diversity without another expansion or purge.
Confused. There's no limit on the games that can be developed, and in the modern mostly digital market there's not even really a "shelf space" issue either. It's even more absurd nowadays given that the breadth, recognition, and relative popularity of "indie" titles is the best it's been since before there was meaningfully a "AAA" industry.
MC1980 said:
Windknight said:
Uh.. can't anyone who actually wants it just import it? Koei are probably getting all the sales they want/need via that route, so don't actually need to bring it over.
You are vastly overestimating the amount of people who import videogames.
You are vastly underestimating the percentage of DOA fans who just suddenly became aware of Play-asia, for the low, low cost of one tweet.
FredTheUndead said:
Superbeast said:
That last re-tweet...what the hell has Anita Sarkeesian got to do with this particular instance? It really seems like they are courting the "anti-SJW" crowd and drumming up fake controversy.
Because they are.
Play-asia definitely is. Even if you operate on the premise that the game isn't getting a western release because of not wanting to deal with SJWs (not entirely impossible). It only makes sense for Play-asia to do everything they can to draw attention to the game, because they expressly specialize in exporting Japanese games to Western audiences where the game either has no NA/EU release or a censored one. The DOAX3 situation plays exactly into their strengths, and once people are looking at your store front, you might get them to buy other things too.
MarsAtlas said:
Its probably more of a publicity stunt for Huniepop and whatever next game that they're working on than a genuine desire to publish it, but it seems to be working. Unless they're just awful at business, in which case they should probably retreat on this to live and publish smut games another day.
It almost certainly is, as in the end it gets them a bunch of advertising either way and if Tecmo Koei bites they certainly won't *lose* money from publishing it. All said, they're probably better off to sink that money into the cam girl sim they're working on instead (Hunie Cam Girl Studio, I think it's called?).