popdafoo said:Oh no... not the Large Hadron Collider... I don't think that hyperdrive could be worth the chance of us all getting sucked into a black hole.
Back in the 17th century we could manage voyages between the continents that took months if not years with relative ease.Nimbus said:Only a fraction of the speed of light? I guess that means we could easily travel between planets in our own solar system, but not much else.
Even if we could travel at the speed of light, it would still take years to reach another system. And besides, what would we do when we got there?
No it doesn't i misread the article.CUnk said:I don't know. Does it? And so what if it does?Zenode said:Doesn't this go against Einsteins theory of relativity??
Science is always evolving and adapting. Nothing is written in stone. If you want rules and laws that can't been toppled by new evidence and understanding turn to religion.
No theory is set in stone. A billion billion positive results cant prove something, it only takes one disproving result to ruin a theory. But some theories have been tested so many times they can be taken to be pretty much guaranteed (well at least for energies we can currently produce. Newtons laws work until you start going really fast)CUnk said:[ And yes this theory IS set in stone
See: E=mc^2
How do Newtons theories not work at high speedsAnoos said:No theory is set in stone. A billion billion positive results cant prove something, it only takes one disproving result to ruin a theory. But some theories have been tested so many times they can be taken to be pretty much guaranteed (well at least for energies we can currently produce. Newtons laws work until you start going really fast)CUnk said:[ And yes this theory IS set in stone
See: E=mc^2
Have you tried GameStop? They'll take your pre-order for anything...canadamus_prime said:Cool! Where can I pre-order myself a starship?
You get to modify the equation! If I remember rightly mass becomes a function of velocity and the speed of light.Zenode said:How do Newtons theories not work at high speedsAnoos said:No theory is set in stone. A billion billion positive results cant prove something, it only takes one disproving result to ruin a theory. But some theories have been tested so many times they can be taken to be pretty much guaranteed (well at least for energies we can currently produce. Newtons laws work until you start going really fast)CUnk said:[ And yes this theory IS set in stone
See: E=mc^2
You are right hiperdrive is different as this doesn't bend the law of relativity. Warp drive does, the difference is that in warp drive you need a warp buble around space craft that bend (by human eye it breaks) the law of relativity. And this is not impossible as such warp buble could be created and in the next 200-300 years will suerly have this tehnology.sms_117b said:I didn't want to be the one to say this, but aren't "Hyperdrive" and "Warp" two different things?
From what I can make out, you still need to accelerate something else to the speed of light to begin with, so, not really much use as far as ship propulsion is concerned, unless it can use mass amounts of photons, then we would have almost infinite amounts of "fuel".
I thought so, "warp" has been the main focus for years, but the gravity bubble is hard to generate, let alone warp space and time around it, something like that is almost impossible to calulate. I thought hyperdrive was faster than light, not sure how, but I remember reading something and a distance comparison was hyperdrive for a minute or so and warp 9 for a few hours. I don't want to check this but I can feel the nerd in me getting more and more curious.destroyer2k said:You are right hiperdrive is different as this doesn't bend the law of relativity. Warp drive does, the difference is that in warp drive you need a warp buble around space craft that bend (by human eye it breaks) the law of relativity. And this is not impossible as such warp buble could be created and in the next 200-300 years will suerly have this tehnology.sms_117b said:I didn't want to be the one to say this, but aren't "Hyperdrive" and "Warp" two different things?
From what I can make out, you still need to accelerate something else to the speed of light to begin with, so, not really much use as far as ship propulsion is concerned, unless it can use mass amounts of photons, then we would have almost infinite amounts of "fuel".
Ow and the main difference is that hiperdrive couldn't go light speed only near, but warp could go beyond light speed and still not breaking einstain theory.
I didn't see that hiperdrive could go beyond speed of light. About gravity bubble this isn't hard to creat the main problem is powering it (by current theory you need infinitive energy). The same goes for worm hole we have a idea how to creat (on one side gravity and at the end anti-gravity) but powering this thing with infinitive energy this nobody know how to make.sms_117b said:I thought so, "warp" has been the main focus for years, but the gravity bubble is hard to generate, let alone warp space and time around it, something like that is almost impossible to calulate. I thought hyperdrive was faster than light, not sure how, but I remember reading something and a distance comparison was hyperdrive for a minute or so and warp 9 for a few hours. I don't want to check this but I can feel the nerd in me getting more and more curious.destroyer2k said:You are right hiperdrive is different as this doesn't bend the law of relativity. Warp drive does, the difference is that in warp drive you need a warp buble around space craft that bend (by human eye it breaks) the law of relativity. And this is not impossible as such warp buble could be created and in the next 200-300 years will suerly have this tehnology.sms_117b said:I didn't want to be the one to say this, but aren't "Hyperdrive" and "Warp" two different things?
From what I can make out, you still need to accelerate something else to the speed of light to begin with, so, not really much use as far as ship propulsion is concerned, unless it can use mass amounts of photons, then we would have almost infinite amounts of "fuel".
Ow and the main difference is that hiperdrive couldn't go light speed only near, but warp could go beyond light speed and still not breaking einstain theory.
Apparently hyperdrive is like driving a road in "subspace", just depends on the thruster speed of each ship. Infinite energy aside, the bubble may not be hard to create, but you would need a very powerful computer to strengthen and weaken the field in certain areas to move in the desired direction. Lets not go to worm holes yet, they are however, very cool.destroyer2k said:I didn't see that hiperdrive could go beyond speed of light. About gravity bubble this isn't hard to creat the main problem is powering it (by current theory you need infinitive energy). The same goes for worm hole we have a idea how to creat (on one side gravity and at the end anti-gravity) but powering this thing with infinitive energy this nobody know how to make.