Duane Gish. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duane_GishAtheistGuy said:Name one creationist biologist. Please. I asked for them ages ago and nobody could give me one.
Duane Gish. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duane_GishAtheistGuy said:Name one creationist biologist. Please. I asked for them ages ago and nobody could give me one.
In my experience they say they're biologists or geologists (with degrees and everything), but in their arguments make mistakes or, possibly, intentional omissions, on things that first-year students who get Ds in the class would still understand. (I should know, I graded students who failed exams but still got the stream rejuvenation questions right, whereas an alleged geologist gave a talk supporting Young Earth Creationism and pretended that rejuvenated streams didn't exist. They may call themselves scientists, but they are completely undeserving of the term.Jmurray21 said:You shouldn't fear biologist who are creationists. There are plenty of them in today's science and each of them come up with genuine arguments as to why evolution doesn't exists.AtheistGuy said:Snip.
Except it's not just a matter of opinion or of acceptance. It's about being just plain unqualified for your job. If you think evolution or natural selection don't happen, then you don't know enough about biology to be fit for work in the field. That's all there is to it. I'm not sure how to convey to you just how solid the evidence for it is, not to mention the fact that it's observed in real-time in creatures with sufficiently small intervals between generations, such as bacteria.Jmurray21 said:we're supposed to be in an age of acceptance but once someones opinion is different all hell brakes loose.
Possibly, depending on why you're a creationist.Jmurray21 said:I'm a creationist, does that mean I'm stupid.
Then it's more likely that you're not stupid. Well, actually, you were talking about the whole evolution-deniers-as-biologists thing as a matter of acceptance, which is a really stupid comment to make. Reminds me of this one doonesbury comic...Jmurray21 said:I don't believe the Earth was made in six days nor is it only 6000 years and most biologists who are creationists say the same thing.
Yeah. It's not about acceptance or lack of it.Student: This B+ is wrong, Man! You?re dissin? me here big time!
Prof. Deadman: Mr. Slocum, I merely gave you the grade you deserved.
Slocum: Can?t be, Man! This is way off base!
Deadman: As was your entire first proof, in which you held the square root of 144 to be 15. It is, in fact, 12.
Slocum: Well, sure, from a narrow, absolutist, Eurocentric perspective, maybe it?s 12.
Deadman: So?
Slocum: So my culture teaches it?s 15, Man!
Deadman: Fascinating. Would this be an advanced civilization? )
EDIT: Some places define it as a branch of biology, other as chemistry. I'll leave this as a huge question mark for now.Fasckira said:Duane Gish. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duane_GishAtheistGuy said:Name one creationist biologist. Please. I asked for them ages ago and nobody could give me one.
I am sorry for your burden. Hopefully they will all drop out in a few months when they finally fail the class.Spot1990 said:
Again, if you met someone who chose to major in advanced mathematics, perhaps engineering, and rejected arithmetic, would you respect that opinion? We shouldn't just respect everyone's opinion. Some people are wrong, and some people are ridiculously wrong.esperandote said:You shouldn't be ok with their opinion as in agree with them, you should be ok with it as in respect it. Why? Courtesy.MaxwellEdison said:They said they believed in creation, as opposed to evolution. So I'm assuming that means they think evolution is false. Which is more than contradictory, it's stupid.esperandote said:The question is, they believe in evolution in what degree? If they believe that the first humans were adan and eve and that dinousaurs didn't exists then yeah that pretty contradictory but some that believe in creation might believe that God triggered the big bang and everyhing else evolved from there, after all the bible was written by men not by god.
Asking a creationists to prove themselves right is as stupid as the "Where did you come from?" argument because in the end you can't prove God neither you have to, it's something you believe.
What irritates me the most is atheists calling stupid poeple with beliefs when is not of their fucking bussines. (As ironic as it is that it irritates me)
I never asked for creationists to prove their point, so I'll ignore that bit.
I don't think there's any problem calling someone's idea about a topic stupid, especially when it is. Honestly, it's just a slightly more insulting way of saying they're incorrect on this topic. But again, that's not the issue I was talking about in my post.
I'm saying that it's stupid to discount evolution if you're studying biology, and that we shouldn't be ok with that opinion. You still haven't said why you think we should be.
You're absolutely positive that he wasn't just taking the piss? I mean, you are the one who thought to bring up Creationism to a science major... Sounds to me like he was just having a laugh at your expense.AtheistGuy said:But the real kicker is when I asked them a question so simple, there should have been no need to ask it. "Creation or Evolution"? The one that skipped constantly gave an answer you'd expect, the other one (Mind you biology major) said "Creation of course".
That's what I thought it was. Till I heard his stupid questions. Kidding or not that's just unacceptable.EdwardOrchard said:You're absolutely positive that he wasn't just taking the piss? I mean, you are the one who thought to bring up Creationism to a science major... Sounds to me like he was just having a laugh at your expense.AtheistGuy said:But the real kicker is when I asked them a question so simple, there should have been no need to ask it. "Creation or Evolution"? The one that skipped constantly gave an answer you'd expect, the other one (Mind you biology major) said "Creation of course".