Just becasue you like to drive longer distances does not mean you are entitled to cheaper gas. i sued gas as an example that many things are indeed cheaper in US and yet we live off 500 a month. The biggest problem with 500 a month for you is rent, which is, to use meme, "too damn high". I dont know how good the public trnasport system is where you live, here i use public transport instead of my own car to get to work because it is simpler. even ignoring the fact that its cheaper, it would be better to use public transport. Car is a luxury item. It should not be a must-have for poor.runic knight said:And americans drive many times the amount the average european does, therefore rendering the idea that the gas is cheaper pointless when they still have to pay a few times the amount total over an equal period of time simply because the lack of alternatives in order to commute the longer distances to work.
$4.50 an hour amounts to about $750 a month, if they can even gain 40 hours a week(something that is rare in the service industry since without that timetable, it allows companies some loopholes to pay them less in the first place). So yeah, care to show me how someone can survive with, oh, lets be generous here, $500 dollars a month based on a single service industry job making about 30 hours or so. Also, where were you taking into account rent and food, as they are regionally priced many times, even among the states themselves. But please, go on and lecture the poor about how they don't know how to be poor, I am sure that wont come off as horribly patronizing or anything.
I do not doubt that people can survive off of that, but that is frequently terrible existence, often far worse when you take into account that if you are working a service job as an only source of income and have to commute any distance, as the money you make goes into the tank more often then not. Oh, and lets not forget the pattern of single parents having to take lower income jobs, such as service industry, due to lack of schooling or simply no other options and the added financial burdens that brings with it.
Lets not bring children into this. if you cant live off your wage, and them make children, which makes you even more bellow powerty line, you are simply stupid and bring misery unto your children. i have no pity for people who use their sexual organs before using their brains.
they have an option. multiple actually. but us, custumers, with our tips, are feeding the broken system. we are at fault for supporting system we know is wrong.You blame the system but accuse the people with no other option of not doing something? Bet you were all confused about why the slaves didn't just revolt too, weren't you? I mean, they outnumber the owners, right? Or why the demand for equal rights wasn't enough for the minorities. Changes can happen, but there is often a requirement for some larger pressure to force the change in the first place. As with many, this would have to be a government pressure, as few businesses will do it to themselves when it cuts into profits.
People need money to survive, to raise their kids and to simply exist in any form. There is a lot more people looking for jobs then there are jobs available. SOMEONE will take your job if you try to protest your working conditions, and even if you could get all the working poor Americans to do so, I recall the States having issues of immigration and illegals being hired because they work for even less. Your method does not work when there is competition for your job as it is. And unlike the auto industry, most service jobs can not even form unions because there is no skill set required to work there in the first place that would slow replacement, no stability in the job to maintain connections and grow a union framework from, and too many people with no other option who will therefore compromise for the sake of survival.
The system now practically requires a fix from government enforcement. What you are proposing is that the market will fix itself if people just all worked towards it, yet you ignore the fundamentals of supply and demand that help cause this problem in the first place. There are more supply for jobs, then demand, thus price (wages) go down because they can get away with it. People will compromise their dignity to survive or to help their families survive and will accept lower wages and bad conditions, as they always have when the businesses offer them because there is no other way for those people to get by on average. And much like how it took government action to enforce things like basic safety and working conditions in the first place, so too would it be required to change a greedy business. Ground up does not work with the working poor because they have to worry about survival first, and it is better to scrape an existence and get by then starve based on your ideals, all the more true with it is your family starving because of them.
You are naive and now come off as condescending too.
Slaves did revolt. many times, sometimes sucesfully.
Yes, there needs to be pressure. stop giving tips. here you got a pressure.
Yes, people need money to exist. They are NOT getting money in waiting industry. they should NOT take a job there. But they do, and here we have a core of a problem. As lnog as there are a mass of people agreeing to work for 2 dollars per hour, the problem will persist, and nothing can do anything about it till they themselves do.
I am not ignoring the supply demand. i am saying that we should discourage the supply (by not giving tips) so there woudl be more demand than supply, hence increasing the wage. Government encorfecment is good, but the minimum wage exceptions already prove thats not going to happen.
So, you said illegal immigrants work for even less. and they get by. and then you just said you cant live off that wage. but illegals can somehow. they dont need food or gas or home i guess, right?
No. they simply have been living of low wages all their lives and know how to not waste a cent.
Ground up will work only with the poor since they are the only ones that really dont have anything to loose.
Yes, i an condescending, i dont think wrong decisions should be rewarded with tips.
Ok. Quite strange then, as 3-3,5 profit margin makes absolutely no sense from investment perpective. i guess there still are people who do it else there would be no restaurants to begin with, but no "big suit" would ever touch margins so low.kiri2tsubasa said:Okay, the hotel has a business center so here at the hotel has computer so here is the figures that I saw.Strazdas said:snip
http://smallbusiness.chron.com/average-profit-margin-restaurant-13477.html
At best there is a possible 5% profit margin, but on average, at all levels, the average profit margin is at around 3-3.5%.