See, when I see "Now I'm really looking forward to the weekend." the period looks like the guy isn't all that excited about it; if you type it as "Now I'm really looking forward to the weekend!" it shows excitement, but it's the kind of excitement that implies cheering, not the kind that shows someone is happy that their girlfriend is coming over. However, if you type it as "Now I'm really looking forward to the weekend =D" the exact mood intended is conveyed in the text. Sure, 12 year olds use emoticons, but when used properly it doesn't have to make you look like one. That's like saying 12 year olds use microphones when playing games online, so anyone using a microphone looks like a 12 year old -- or like saying 12 year olds play videogames, and adults shouldn't, for that matter.hypovolemia said:I find them annoying and they make me picture the poster as an idiotic 12-year-old (a 12-year-old who happens to be an idiot, that is). I don't know why. Still, I do get their point:
If I remember correctly that's actually 90%. 90% of the information you are trying to convey is lost in pure text form. Isn't that nice?Avaholic03 said:In normal face-to-face conversation, more than half of the information conveyed is non-verbal.
Emoticons may be more convenient, but if you are even a bit eloquent you shouldn't have any problems with not using them. You could say something like "Now I'm really looking forward to this weekend." I mean, I am terribly lazy and still don't use emoticons. They are never necessary, they just make things easier. And look stupid. Well, most of them, anyway.brunothepig said:They can be used to express emotion or tone, a lot better than any other method I can think of in text based communication. [...]
After all, which seems like a stranger response to, say, my girlfriend informing me she can come visit me this weekend? "I am happy" or "![]()
![]()
".
Having said that, I wish there was a better (and convenient) indicator for the use of sarcasm.
Edit: Also, that 90% figure is a well known case of hyperbole. If it was 90%, written language wouldn't work at all.