Funny that. Every game gets developed on a PC and yet its a market that can lose business and innovation to the console market. I always found that odd. If you develop it on the computer every time why is there not always a pc version?
Massive piracy is only rampant on games with heavy anti-piracy measures, and in the great down under PC games are on average cheaper than their console counterparts. Console games can go as high as $110 for a standard game. PC games at $110 are almost always the special or collector's editions - and that's stretching it. Most special and collector's editions are closer to $90 on release.MisterShine said:Hmm, I'd say massive piracy coupled with the fact that console versions of games sell a heck of a lot more than their pc counterparts do, for the most part? Plus they've been 50 dollars for like 20 years now, we've been lucky to last this long.Assassin Xaero said:... but that doesn't change the fact that more and more games are being bumped up to $60 instead of $50 (Skyrim, Rage, Assassin's Creed 2, Modern Warfare 2, Black Ops, Dead Space 2, Crysis 2),
This is indeed a sad trend, which is why I usually wait a few days to read reviews from people who bought it and gaming sites, usually shitty optimization is one of the first things to be pointed out. We just need to start voting with our wallets that bullcrap like that just won't be tolerated.while, at the same times, were getting more and more shitty console ports. Console games have to pay $60 to cover the game and licensing fees, but what do we have to pay more for on PC? Pay for them to port it over and not even bother to even change the controls for easier use with a keyboard (Singularity)?
However, you have to weigh what we have over console users: we have mods. Poor, poor console community..
edit:
I read this a lot, and I just don't know where it comes from. I got Blops on launch day (30 bucks at amazon! WOO!), it took me two days to beat the single player campaign without getting any patches and I thought it worked fine. It didn't run as well as Modern Warfare did but I assume its because it was more graphically intensive anyway. I've played some shitty PC ports in my day but blops just wasn't one of them.EcksTeaSea said:Not every PC port is shitty. Black Ops was probably the worst one that I can remember since ever, but even that got patches.
Hah, was gonna make a thread concerning prices on PC games. Like seriously, what the hell? 60$ for a possibly 14-20 hour game is so bleh.Assassin Xaero said:But in my eyes, PC gaming is now dying. Yeah, sure, people will come post that "PC Gaming, happily dying since..." picture, but that doesn't change the fact that more and more games are being bumped up to $60 instead of $50 (Skyrim, Rage, Assassin's Creed 2, Modern Warfare 2, Black Ops, Dead Space 2, Crysis 2), while, at the same times, were getting more and more shitty console ports. Console games have to pay $60 to cover the game and licensing fees, but what do we have to pay more for on PC? Pay for them to port it over and not even bother to even change the controls for easier use with a keyboard (Singularity)?
Sad to say, but considering that I can't afford to pay this much for the lower quality of games we are getting, and the fact that I can't aim for shit with analog sticks, it was nice knowing you gaming. Hopefully more indie games come out for PC so we still have something of quality to play.
This is, very sadly, not the case.Trolldor said:Massive piracy is only rampant on games with heavy anti-piracy measures,.. ~snip~
And the more it gets drmed.MisterShine said:This is, very sadly, not the case.Trolldor said:Massive piracy is only rampant on games with heavy anti-piracy measures,.. ~snip~
http://kotaku.com/5085915/90-of-world-of-goo-installs-are-pirated
Or check for torrents for any game using Steamworks or a simple disk check. Basically the more popular the game, the more it gets pirated. Simple as, sadly![]()
Yes there is, Metro 2033. That game is a pig. That said, your $150 card will still make it look better than it did on a console, which was probably your point.Cronq said:The only people who think PC gaming is expensive are wannabe console converts who buy a pre-made $600 PC for $2k. Upgrade every 6 months? My 4 year old PC is doing just fine keeping up with the 5 year old consoles and their game ports. There isn't a game made today that a $150 card can't max out at 1080p.
Tell that to Blizzard.Tankichi said:I wouldn't agree but it doesn't generate as much revenue as consoles do.
Oh, I have Orange Box and have played several hours of TF2. I just don't find it that great to play over and over. I've moved on to many many other games.BanthaFodder said:dude, SERIOUSLY? GO PLAY TF2 NAO!!!
Yea.. Each game gets a team to port it to the PC, too bad it's just that. A port. And given the amount of bugs in BF:BC2, I really don't have high hopes for BF3 being any good. I mean, these are the people who can't even give a login server enough bandwidth to stop people dropping out. After Ubisoft did it. Ignorant is when you act stupid, stupid is when you do something like that _after_ it's already been done.shootthebandit said:there's some decent games coming out. BF3 despite being multiplayer platform is primarily made for PC. homefront is also got a specific team dedicated to the PC port
$60? ...£37.67? Dude, over here expect to pay $70 for a brand new game. It wont kill PC gaming, it will just make people slightly more poor.Assassin Xaero said:but that doesn't change the fact that more and more games are being bumped up to $60 instead of $50