Maybe I'm being picky, or just don't remember the film, but isn't most - if not all - the dialogue about escaping the male characters? Isn't that a form of talking about men in a way that fails the above test?Veret said:Let me try to explain it another way: One woman, tired of being ignored by the film industry, came up with something called the Bechdel Test (you may have heard of it). In order to pass the test, a movie must contain:
1) at least two women, who
2) talk to each other, about
3) something other than a man.
An unbelievable number of movies fail at this, but Sucker Punch passes with flying colors.
Correct me if I'm wrong, also, but isn't that test concerning whether the film has a female presence in it? It's not exactly a coherent test of 'good' women in films, since any film staring a mostly female cast will actually pass this test: even if all they do is talk about purses and shoes.
I'm not big fan of the film, really. I think the meaning was less subtle than it was hardly existence. The female characters were still lifeless in my eyes and their fantasy seemed all too willing to empower the men of the film above the station of the women. I really do see it as trashy action with heavy emphasis on music and stylisation, which isn't a bad thing but I was made to expect more.