It's a gaming forum. People talk about games, whether they like them or not...iamq said:I like how people makes threads just to say that they don't like a popular game.
Thank you for ripping out my silent thoughts and stuff it my mouth. Very well done.Misterpinky said:HERETICS HERETICS HERETICS!!!!!!!!!!!
Ahem.
I loved the game, but I can see why some people wouldn't like it. It's rather arcade-like and unrealistic, so it doesn't surprise me that some people are frustrated by a 14 year old hyped up on sugar killing you from across the map with a pistol while jumping. Also, it didn't really do anything new, it just did it really well.
I preferred it to WaW because the online was much more balanced (at least on the computer, I've heard console auto aim makes certain weapons way to good) and the campaign of CoD 4 was easily the best in the series. I get adreneline just thinking about it. Also, WaW is yet another WW2 game. I love WW2 but it has been beaten to death.
And to you lovers of CoD2, it was a good game, but not quite as good as CoD4. The online had no stat tracking (on the PC) and the offline was just very good, not freaking amazing.
Bit cheesy but never the less, rather brilliant.fedpayne said:What I wanted though, was a post credit sequence back in the UK, where Soap is telling the story to some new SAS recruits or something, and Price comes in on a wheelchair, gets up, and shakes Soap's hand and everyone cheers. Sigh.
Yeah I've been there too, but I've been on both sides of that circumstance. I been the one who was killed and I've been the one who turns around and kills the guy with two shots. You two have to admit, it's fun when you do it right?pimppeter2 said:Yea, I really hated seeing someone and shooting at them, only to have them turn around and kill me with like 2 bullets. Especially when I know they where so close to dyingRandomtime said:Perhaps it was the aiming system, but it only seemed to work one way (as in this person sees me first, and kills me, I see this person first, empty a whole load of ammo and some grenades, and then still get killed).Machines Are Us said:Not criticising your right to dislike the game but this bit makes no sense to me.
I don't see how else it could work? The quickest/most observant one wins, how else should it be?Randomtime said:I found the gameplay too much like the person who sees and aims first gets the kill
No, my original post wasn't clear at all.
that just implies you need to play the game more as it involves a lot of skill. sometimes people get lucky but all goods things require a degree of luckRandomtime said:Perhaps it was the aiming system, but it only seemed to work one way (as in this person sees me first, and kills me, I see this person first, empty a whole load of ammo and some grenades, and then still get killed).Machines Are Us said:Not criticising your right to dislike the game but this bit makes no sense to me.
I don't see how else it could work? The quickest/most observant one wins, how else should it be?Randomtime said:I found the gameplay too much like the person who sees and aims first gets the kill
No, my original post wasn't clear at all.
Your avatar is full of win!Jirlond said:I liked it too - WaW was boring as hell and there is a lot less balance than in COD4.
I've had some good times on it - and it was mainly those experiences that made it a good game. I still day PC TF2 is my favourite.
Wait, are you talking to me? If you are, then you must've completely misinterpreted my post in some fashion. Or I misinterpreted your post.Bigeyez said:^^^^ M16 with stopping power is one of the best weapons in CoD4 if you get good with it. One burst can drop anyone not using juggernaut.dodo1331 said:You can apply this to WaW, but not CoD4. Three of the best guns in the game are given to you at the first level. M16, MP5, and M40A3. The only gun you could need besides these would maybe be M21 and P90.Torque669 said:I agree completely. I found COD2 the best in the series. Multiplayer on COD4 was okay but wasnt fair at all if you got matched up with people higher ranks than you and as such had better weapons.pimppeter2 said:Okay realistic me...
I though it was mediocre, and the multiplayer wasn't that great, the level desing for multiplayer was a little bit shallow. I liked Call of Duty 2 much better. SIngle player, multiplayer, the whole shabam. Call of Duty 2 is still the best in the series
Honestly it kinda sounds like your just not that good at the game. No offense meant, not everyones good at everything. And hell you may just not like it like you said, nothing wrong with that at all. I know people who liked WaW but hated modern warfare, to each his own I guess.
See, so many people think this way. A good player can easily "turn on" (that is, the act of seeing your getting shot, spinning around and dropping the guy shooting you) someone who has the first shot. Just like good players who have the first shot can by some miracle of God not kill the guy they aimed at.Randomtime said:Perhaps it was the aiming system, but it only seemed to work one way (as in this person sees me first, and kills me, I see this person first, empty a whole load of ammo and some grenades, and then still get killed).Machines Are Us said:Not criticising your right to dislike the game but this bit makes no sense to me.
I don't see how else it could work? The quickest/most observant one wins, how else should it be?Randomtime said:I found the gameplay too much like the person who sees and aims first gets the kill
No, my original post wasn't clear at all.
yeah my bad for not being more clear =)dodo1331 said:Wait, are you talking to me? If you are, then you must've completely misinterpreted my post in some fashion. Or I misinterpreted your post.Bigeyez said:^^^^ M16 with stopping power is one of the best weapons in CoD4 if you get good with it. One burst can drop anyone not using juggernaut.dodo1331 said:You can apply this to WaW, but not CoD4. Three of the best guns in the game are given to you at the first level. M16, MP5, and M40A3. The only gun you could need besides these would maybe be M21 and P90.Torque669 said:I agree completely. I found COD2 the best in the series. Multiplayer on COD4 was okay but wasnt fair at all if you got matched up with people higher ranks than you and as such had better weapons.pimppeter2 said:Okay realistic me...
I though it was mediocre, and the multiplayer wasn't that great, the level desing for multiplayer was a little bit shallow. I liked Call of Duty 2 much better. SIngle player, multiplayer, the whole shabam. Call of Duty 2 is still the best in the series
Honestly it kinda sounds like your just not that good at the game. No offense meant, not everyones good at everything. And hell you may just not like it like you said, nothing wrong with that at all. I know people who liked WaW but hated modern warfare, to each his own I guess.
If you're not talking to me, then.. yea.
EDIT: I see who you're talking to now I think, never mind.
I don't know what guns you use, but if you're behind someone and they don't have Juggernaut or know you're there, it should be an ee-zee kill. There are a few exceptions of course, concerning luck and recoil, but I reckon a combination of bad luck, lag and a poor experience has put you off a good multiplayer experience.pimppeter2 said:Its not that, its just that when you shoot someone in the back thery should die. Not be able to spin around and have a chance at winning.Octorok said:snip