if halo 3 came to ps3 would u buy it?

Aura Guardian

New member
Apr 23, 2008
5,114
0
0
SwampCandle said:
No, never.

Why would any of us PS3 owners but it anyway? We have Killzone 2 and Resistance games.
Exactly. You ps3 owners have Killzone 2 and Resistance. And we Xbox 360 owners have Halo 3. Despite how much I hate that game.
 

Black yeoman

New member
Jun 22, 2008
126
0
0
Err, elaborating on that, because I have played it all at a friends and don't think the multiplayer is worth it.
 

jthm

New member
Jun 28, 2008
825
0
0
runtheplacered said:
Ps3 has a Halo 3 replacement already, I thought. Killzone 2.
Hahahahaha that's a good one. Sadly, Killzone 2 is no more a Halo 3 killer than Killzone 1 was the Halo Killer it was touted as back in the day. I really wish it had been, but it ain't.

That said, both systems have a Halo 3 killer. COD4
 

Wargamer

New member
Apr 2, 2008
973
0
0
Mazty said:
Wargamer said:
Exactly. And Resistance 2 could easily be replaced with Killzone 2.
I actually disagree there. Killzone 2 is a technical masterpiece, but it is not a Halo Killer.

Resistance 2 is a Halo Killer. So much so that Nathan Hale activates the Invisibility Berserk, Phantoms Master Chief, stands over his corpse with the Rossmore aimed and says "Real men don't teabag; we have sex with real girls instead!" before blowing the Space Marine's head off.

Killzone 2 is a very different animal. It feels much more like Gears of War to me, in that the emphasis is not "lol i cn pwn j00 wif jump-shot n00b!", but rather "Hellboy307, drive them out with Grenades. Dethshot, get to the wreaked car and set up enfilading fire, I'll hold here and guard your six."

Whilst Killzone 2 is a far more satisfying game all-round, when you're jsut after a quick burst of mindless violence Resistance 2 is better.
 

Breno

New member
Jul 4, 2008
162
0
0
Darkrai said:
No. And I think you hit the enter button too soon.
i did
when i was on the subject i tough if i hit enter it would go to the text.....i was wrong lol
 

GoldenShadow

New member
May 13, 2008
205
0
0
I'd be happy if Halo 3 merely came out on PC. I own Halo 1 and Halo 2 for PC. I kinda want to see how the series ends.
 

SwampCandle

New member
Nov 3, 2008
90
0
0
I think we can all agree, that both Resistance 2 and Killzone 2 are Halo beaters.

Obviously I'm not asking for a Halo fans input here, because I want an intellectual response, rather than a "STFU N00B! HALO ROXXERS! MULTIPLAYER PWNS! RESISTANCE AND KILLZONE SUCK YOUR MOMMAS DONKEY DICK!!!!"

Ahem, now thats down, responses anyone?
 

-Seraph-

New member
May 19, 2008
3,753
0
0
if I had a PS3, sure why not I liked the multiplayer. Although I would rather see a compitent PC port, ya know...don't pull a fucking Halo 2 vista and do it right like with Halo 1 PC....except fix the net code of coarse....
 

jthm

New member
Jun 28, 2008
825
0
0
Mazty said:
jthm said:
runtheplacered said:
Ps3 has a Halo 3 replacement already, I thought. Killzone 2.
Hahahahaha that's a good one. Sadly, Killzone 2 is no more a Halo 3 killer than Killzone 1 was the Halo Killer it was touted as back in the day. I really wish it had been, but it ain't.

That said, both systems have a Halo 3 killer. COD4
Killzone 2 has better A.I.
Killzone 2 has better graphics.
Killzone 2 has better audio (7.1)
Killzone 2 has better gameplay (Cover system, no back tracking)

As for the storyline, Killzone 2 is more realistic, but that doesn't make it better, just makes it more realistic.

Killzone 2 easily is a Halo 3 beater as it does much more for the genre considering their relative release dates. Having played both when they were first released, I was genuinly dissapointed with Halo 3, whereas Killzone 2 gives the genre a much higher benchmark to aim for.
/sigh

Killzone 2 has better enemy AI. Give me a marine or the Arbiter over that worthless bum team mate from KZ2 any day.
Killzone 2 has no co-op. On or Offline. That alone is enough to make me partial to Halo.
How many gamers actually appreciate better audio? 7.1 or not it's still going through the same stereo I've had for 20 years.
The gameplay is debatable. The cover system works selectively, the controls aren't fun. Even with the fix in the new patch, the Dual Shock design simply isn't as good for FPS as the 360 controller. Never has been, never will be.
Halo 3 has better music.

Wait, wait. Killzone 2 does nothing new for the genre. It borrows from every other shooting game. What it does do is it takes those borrowed elements and implements them exceptionally well. What it fails to do is innovate. Halo 3 had forge mode, 4 player co-op and a more varied multiplayer.

You're quite right in that it has better graphics, but given the hardware specs and the comparative release dates, it should. I'm not sure how Aliens from space is less realistic than Humans from another planet, but frankly, they're both shooters. Who cares about the story? Physics and imagery wise, KZ2 is more realistic, but you're also right in pointing out that isn't a good or bad thing. Fact is I play games to escape realism, not immerse myself in it. If you want realism, go join the army.

To be honest, both games disappointed me upon release, but Killzone 2 was the larger disappointment. I can't call this a Halo Killer though. It just doesn't have the substance.
 

VTSK

New member
Jun 3, 2008
242
0
0
I never understood the appeal of Halo games. I've played all three I found them to be okay, but certainly not great. I don't just mean the single player campain because I'm not a fan of the multi-player either. If I want a good online shooter, I'd much rather play Unreal Tournament 3, or MGO. So no, if for some reason Halo 3 came to PS3, I wouldn't buy it.
 

Hamster at Dawn

It's Hazard Time!
Mar 19, 2008
1,650
0
0
I was playing Halo 3 earlier today as it happens and it was a lot of fun. It's actually one of the few multiplayer games I really enjoy. Obviously the campaign is pants (although still fun in coop) but the online is great fun with a few friends. Yes the game is buggy but that's honestly half the fun. Most of what happens online in Halo 3 is total bullshit but that's why it's so fun - because it's unpredictable and fast paced. You can pretty much throw tactics out the window too. Sounds like a criticism again but it's not. Just don't take the game seriously and you can have a blast.
 

Breno

New member
Jul 4, 2008
162
0
0
Wargamer said:
Breno said:
it seem people hate halo 3 just cause people with it always go on about how good it is i myself dont have a 360 but i love it and i would buy it if it came to ps3 would u?

ofcourse there no chance of it happing
Hmm, let's see...

Inferior graphics to Resistance 2.

Inferior weaponry balance to Resistance 2.

Inferior weaponry in general to Resistance 2.

Smaller games than Resistance 2.

VASTLY inferior single player mode to Resistance 2.

No Class-based gameplay, unlike Resistance 2.

More bugs than Resistance 2.

Less Character Customisation than Resistance 2.



Where, exactly, is the reason to buy this game AT ALL, let alone if it hypothetically came to PS3? The only thing it seems to have going for it is you get vehicles, which is not in itself always helpful; go try playing Warhawk as a footslogger, and you'll soon be sick to fucking death of vehicles.
u are forgetting forge and the movie maker type thing and the way in wich the game are played for instance in reistance 2 team deathmatch 60 players it is just runing aimlessly looking for someone to shoot at when u find them u of corse u start shooting but wheil u are fireing there is a big chance another player from ur side or theres will come along and help u or them whiel in halo u will proble ending up jumping around throwing granade around the corner and its very much a 1 on 1 most of the time oka sure in R2 u can have smaller match or play skirmis but its the small diffences that makes the game. things such has how powerful is a punch or if u move dose ur accuracy go down or stay the same that and the way u can has very custom custom games(and i tought resistance 2 graphics look bad just the way they where presented it look really stupit to me anyway)

i am not a halo 3 fanboy i do not own halo 3 i play R2 and K2 but i just dont think halo 3 deserves the crap it gets
 

ckam

Make America Great For Who?
Oct 8, 2008
1,618
0
0
I don't have a 360 or PS3. But speaking from experience, "No, why would I get a crappy game on a $600 console. I want to spend my money wisely."
 

VTSK

New member
Jun 3, 2008
242
0
0
Psychosocial said:
I already have it, so no.

Anyways, do you really expect any of these angry PS3 fanboys to say yes? That would be like Poland saying I love Germany during WW2.
You do, of course, realize that not every one who doesn't like Halo is a fanboy, correct? Some people just don't think it's a good game. Like I said, I don't understand what's so great about it, I find it pretty average, but to each his own, I suppose.
 

AndyFromMonday

New member
Feb 5, 2009
3,921
0
0
Fix your grammar please...seriously do.

Also, no I wouldn't buy a Playstation 3 just for the sake of Halo. Sure Halo IS a good game, but it's not worth it at all to buy an entire console over. No game is, 'cause you'll eventually get bored of that game and you'll find yourself whit a console you hate and one game you like on it.
 

midpipps

New member
Feb 23, 2009
328
0
0
Nope already own halo 3. If I didn't own it then maybe depending on how well it ported. Also own killzone 1 and 2 and resistance 1 and 2 and I think they all have their merits just depends on what kind of mood I am in for that day of gaming.