if halo 3 came to ps3 would u buy it?

Wargamer

New member
Apr 2, 2008
973
0
0
Alright, as tired as I am of going over the same points again and again, let's do this one more time...

irishdelinquent said:
Wargamer said:
Inferior weaponry balance to Resistance 2.
QTF? How are the weapons unbalanced? I have never encountered any problems with the weapons balance in Halo 3.
Resistance 2 - if I want to snipe, I spawn with a Sniper Rifle. If I want to shotgun people in the face, I spawn with the shotgun. If I want to nuke someone with a massive Laser Cannon, I have to give up the option of having Invisibility, half damage, rapid-healing, double-damage or any other Berserk bonus... and I only get two shots with the big Laser.

Halo 3 - if I want to snipe, I have to find the Sniper Rifle before anyone else. If I want to shotgun people in the face, I have to find the Shotgun before anyone else. If I want to nuke someone with a massive Laser Cannon, I have to find the Spartan Laser before anyone else.

How is "First come, first serve, fuck the rest of you" more balanced than "every weapon is available from the start, balanced against one another, and the super-weapons are earned in place of alternative super-abilities"?

Wargamer said:
Inferior weaponry in general to Resistance 2.
Again arguable. Resistance 2 does have some impressive weaponry, but then again....that's the main draw of the game! Halo 3 has the standard fair of FPS games, and has some unique and interesting additions.
[/quote]
Halo 3's weapons are dull as fuck, and broken when not dull as fuck. To name but a few weapons of Resistance 2...

CARBINE - a Machinegun with an underslung Grenade Launcher.
MARKSMAN - a "baby" Sniper Rifle that can fire lightning balls.
BULLSEYE - A rapid fire energy weapon that fires homing tags, drawing your shots to the target.
AUGER - A plasma cannon that fires through solid matter, and can produce energy shields.
WRAITH - A Minigun that can produce energy shields.
FAREYE - A Sniper Rifle that slows time for the user [except in multiplayer].
SPLICER - A gun that fires circular saw blades - it's just like Half Life 2, only this time you can rev the blade so it keep spinning inside your victim! Finally, it works like a chainsaw too!

Wargamer said:
Smaller games than Resistance 2.
Fair enough. Resistance had larger online matches. But then again, Xbox Live is MUCH busier than Playstation Online/Home. Trying to run so many matches of a larger size would cause hell for the servers; remember, Xbox Live has more than a handful of games online that people are playing.
I've seen at least 50 unranked games on at a time for Competitive alone... and over half were 60-man games (and full / near full ones at that). We can't track how many Ranked games are running at any one time.

Wargamer said:
VASTLY inferior single player mode to Resistance 2.
Definately arguable. The quality of game play, especially that of the single-player experience, is all obviously personal opinion.
[/quote]
All my friends who own a 360, and own Halo 3, agree the solo play mode was a failure. Nobody I know who follows the Resistance series feels that way about Resistance 2.

Wargamer said:
No Class-based gameplay, unlike Resistance 2.
This isn't such a big deal. I prefer to look at it this way; Halo 3 has much more fluid gameplay, with players in co-op not forced into a specific class.
Like was said before, Halo 3's co-op is "lol i play on ma own wiv a n00b followin me!"

Resistance 2's Co-op is "Soldier, get that Wraith up front! Medic, keep the Soldier alive! Spec-Op, give the Soldier some ammo then snipe!"

If you want to run around as the medic trying to gun everyone down, and not bother healing, you can. You'll lose, but you're free to do that. Teams that win in Co-op, especially on "Superhuman" difficulty, win because they play as a team!

Wargamer said:
More bugs than Resistance 2.
I have played quite a bit of Halo 3, and have never really run into any bugs. Hell, I've barely encountered slowdown.
As said, see Youtube.

Wargamer said:
Less Character Customisation than Resistance 2.
Thank God, IMO. Halo 2 made the mistake of trying to make me give a crap about the Arbiter. Try and cram too many characters into a game, and it becomes one of the latest Sonic entries, or nothinf but fanservice like MGS4.
Well done, moron, you missed the point!

Halo 3 customisation = "My armour is Red/Blue/Green/Whatever and my shoulder pads are Red/Blue/Green/Whatever and my Helmet is Standard/Samurai/Retarded."

Resistance 2 customisation = "I have over a dozen body types, a dozen head types, a dozen backpacks, several dozen accessories and on top of that several full-character kits that give us a special pre-made character layout, all of which ensuring I need never look like everyone else, even in a Team game."
 

MiracleOfSound

Fight like a Krogan
Jan 3, 2009
17,776
0
0
Hamster at Dawn said:
I was playing Halo 3 earlier today as it happens and it was a lot of fun. It's actually one of the few multiplayer games I really enjoy. Obviously the campaign is pants (although still fun in coop) but the online is great fun with a few friends. Yes the game is buggy but that's honestly half the fun. Most of what happens online in Halo 3 is total bullshit but that's why it's so fun - because it's unpredictable and fast paced. You can pretty much throw tactics out the window too. Sounds like a criticism again but it's not. Just don't take the game seriously and you can have a blast.
I agree. I've only played Halo online twice:

Alone: it sucked. matched up with screaming american brats with sexual predilictions for eachothers' mothers. Quickly got into a spawn-die-get shouted at routine.

With 4 buddies: Awesome fun. Laughing at eachother's mistakes and deaths and friendly piss taking while running eachother over in the warthogs.
 

Marku

New member
Apr 11, 2009
15
0
0
>Supporting competitors with one of your best selling games
That's like Valve releasing their games on OnLive or Impulse.
 

KSarty

Senior Member
Aug 5, 2008
995
0
21
No I wouldn't. I've tried both Halo 1 and 2, and therefore have absolutely no interest in Halo 3.
 
May 7, 2008
1,810
0
0
Valiance said:
sorry user name taken. said:
um...fuck off? lol
I laughed so hard at this post.

Someone might report it but I really don't want to; I love you.
the amount of people asking this when halo 3 was coming out it i was trying so hard not to laugh in there face or say that lol

>.< agh the joys of working in gaming retail lol


my comment is justified
 

Atvomat_Nikonov

New member
Jul 2, 2008
975
0
0
SwampCandle said:
I think we can all agree, that both Resistance 2 and Killzone 2 are Halo beaters.

Obviously I'm not asking for a Halo fans input here, because I want an intellectual response, rather than a "STFU N00B! HALO ROXXERS! MULTIPLAYER PWNS! RESISTANCE AND KILLZONE SUCK YOUR MOMMAS DONKEY DICK!!!!"

Ahem, now thats down, responses anyone?

*Ahem* The Halo multiplayer was actually quite good. I have played both Killzones and Resistances multiplayer, and really disliked them. The Halo multiplayer was quite fun, with good character customization and all that. The guns were lacking, I admit, and most matches(deathmatch anyway) boiled down to whoever could get the sword first but they were still fun. The team objective playlists(Bomb, Capture the Flag, Territories) were very fun, tactical and good for a laugh with a friend or two.

I didnt play much of the PS3's 'Halo Killers', but from what I did play Killzone 2 had a great game mode, but I disliked the weaponry. Ranking up to unlock basic classes seemed a bit harsh, but I understood having to unlock better weapons for those classes and better abuilities for them. The Maps weren't too great, but I only played about three so take that comment with a grain of salt.

I disliked what I played of Resistance, I just didnt find it fun. The few matches I played were too hectic, and a bit confusing but that would be expected as I was very new to the game. Im not going to say anymore about it, because I haven't played Resistance for awhile and if I said anymore I'd get smashed in the head by fans of the game, as what I'd say would be wrong due to my terrible memory.


Scarily enough, that was an Intelligent response(more or less) from a Halo fan. Or and ex-halo fan, I suppose, I havent played the game in awhile
 

DemonI81

New member
Aug 27, 2008
124
0
0
Mazty said:
DemonI81 said:
Mazty said:
oliveira8 said:
Mazty said:
DemonI81 said:
Don't waste your breath man, this dude's all over the threads about the PS3, or video game consoles, and spewing fanboy BS out all over the place.
You can't reason with fanboys, just make them look like the morons they are then ignore them when they throw a hissy fit like a 2 year old who's mom wont buy them a candy bar.
Show how I'm a fanboy and abandon logic for irrational reasoning then. Until then keep your ignorant views to yourself.
You said that a story involving Space wars is realistic.

Band of Brothers is realistic cause its based in real facts.

Killzone is a Sci-Fi story which brings inspirations from colonial Wars and WW2, but in space. Is space wars real these days? Don?t call it realistic call it a good Sci-Fi story. Which what it is a Science fiction story cause its fiction based on current or future speculations of technology and science.
Band of Brothers is a collaboration of true stories, a historical re-enactment of past events.
According to science fiction writer Robert A. Heinlein, "a handy short definition of almost all science fiction might read: realistic speculation about possible future events, based solidly on adequate knowledge of the real world, past and present, and on a thorough understanding of the nature and significance of the scientific method."

Killzone doesn't have any whacky magic or nonsense in it. Guns. Bullets. Lots of bodies. Seems to be realistic speculation, and considering it's not based on Earth, seems about right. Because of that Killzone 2 is a realistic interpretation of the future/somewhere else, but not necessarily reality. Two distinct things.
You really are ***** retarded huh? Every single movie/video game/TV show could be a "realistic interpretation of the future/somewhere" by your logic.
Get off Sony's nuts you fag.
Well done. Your argument there is so mature & well structured. Try the future won't have giant rings of death or other things th\t can't and won't exisit. If you really think anything can happen in the future then you really need to re-evaluate that idea. Killzone is feasble. Giant rings of death is not.
If I really "thing"? Ok.... First off, I've had my 360 for over a year and never had a single problem. The same can be said for 5 of my friends. I only personally know 1 person that got the RROD. Again you PS3 fanboys default to RROD since you have no argument at all.
 

bad rider

The prodigal son of a goat boy
Dec 23, 2007
2,252
0
0
I don't get why people say no, it's a good game. If you like shooters saying you wouldn't seems like your closing your eyes rolling round on the floor shouting nooooo anything on the 360 is bad and not as good as the ps3. Try to get off your pedestals remove your dick from the ps3 or quit using it as a tampon because that's not what it's for.

Giving halo it's merits it's a good shooter, with good multiplayer. Don't down it because of the fan base who they tried to sell it to, or what platform it's on. I think you would find it hard to justify liking shooters and disliking halo 3 to the point you don't think it's worth a playthrough. At least not with sounding like a sony fanboy. Hell if killzone came out on the xbox I would play it, not because it was made by a sony affliated company but because it's a solid game which is recommended by critics.