If only it exsisted
- Thread starter Judgement101
- Start date
Recommended Videos
A first person gang survival shooter set in Manchester, England with no hilarious accents and compelling narrative.
A game with:
-The environmental stylings/explorative capability of the Elder Scrolls
-The graphical sharpness of Mass Effect 2 (no, Crisis is over-the-top)
-The combat system of Dragon Age
-The class depth of D&D (although not necessarily the same exact skills/feats/stats style)
-The story-telling power of Mass Effect 1, minus the Codex
-I can't think of a game that had the best side-quests, although Neverwinter Nights did a pretty damn good job
-A game with the loot system of Dungeons and Dragons Online (dedicated loot for certain players in chests if there is a multiplayer) but with the variety of Diablo
-A game with variable endings
-A game with a decent karma system that actually affects story progression, rather than NPC disposition
I'll add more if I think of anything else, but that game right there would be the shit.
-The environmental stylings/explorative capability of the Elder Scrolls
-The graphical sharpness of Mass Effect 2 (no, Crisis is over-the-top)
-The combat system of Dragon Age
-The class depth of D&D (although not necessarily the same exact skills/feats/stats style)
-The story-telling power of Mass Effect 1, minus the Codex
-I can't think of a game that had the best side-quests, although Neverwinter Nights did a pretty damn good job
-A game with the loot system of Dungeons and Dragons Online (dedicated loot for certain players in chests if there is a multiplayer) but with the variety of Diablo
-A game with variable endings
-A game with a decent karma system that actually affects story progression, rather than NPC disposition
I'll add more if I think of anything else, but that game right there would be the shit.
This. This a million times.namewon said:
I'm just going to go for a cop-out here and say a little game that I'm working on for a project at school, mostly because it would mean that I'd get paid as opposed to doing this out of the goodness of my heart.
Brutal legend 2
Not sure how it could possibly be improved nor how the story could move along from where it left off but whatever.
I'd buy that.
Not sure how it could possibly be improved nor how the story could move along from where it left off but whatever.
So more or less a combination of a single player version of MAG and the Warhammer 40K premise?Generic Gamer said:
I'd buy that.
An online shooter/flight sim/third person action/RTS game based on Starcraft. Bear with me here, I've had this idea since about 2001.
.
Basically, anyone who wants to can log in and play Starcraft as normal, against other players, CPU armies, custom maps, et al (minus ladder and league play... there's no way to keep this truly balanced). Anyone who wants to can also enter the game as a hero unit (an upgraded version of pretty much any combat unit in the game). Players would level up their hero units playing first-person within a existing Starcraft matches. Death for hero units would simply kick the player out of the match they logged into (and ban them from it).
Of course, whichever side they fight for would need to pay them to have them enter the game on their side... otherwise, they're a neutral (hostile) unit to all RTS players in a match. Any orders given to a Hero unit appear as objectives in that player's HUD... they can choose to ignore orders, but the RTS player can also choose to boot 'em out of their army and take back their pay.
In order to keep people from ganging up and completely unbalancing the game... anyone who logged in as a hero unit would be anonymous to all RTS players, appearing only as Hero, (unit type),(unit stats). Likewise, Hero unit players looking to log into a game could only see how many RTS players are involved, the map they're playing on, and how long the match has been going on. There would be no communications available in the Hero unit players' lobby, and regular old school battle.net communication available in the RTS players' lobby.
Mind you, there would need to be a new version of Starcraft with a much more complete physics engine to make this work... and Starcraft 2 ruins my whole concept >.<
.
Basically, anyone who wants to can log in and play Starcraft as normal, against other players, CPU armies, custom maps, et al (minus ladder and league play... there's no way to keep this truly balanced). Anyone who wants to can also enter the game as a hero unit (an upgraded version of pretty much any combat unit in the game). Players would level up their hero units playing first-person within a existing Starcraft matches. Death for hero units would simply kick the player out of the match they logged into (and ban them from it).
Of course, whichever side they fight for would need to pay them to have them enter the game on their side... otherwise, they're a neutral (hostile) unit to all RTS players in a match. Any orders given to a Hero unit appear as objectives in that player's HUD... they can choose to ignore orders, but the RTS player can also choose to boot 'em out of their army and take back their pay.
In order to keep people from ganging up and completely unbalancing the game... anyone who logged in as a hero unit would be anonymous to all RTS players, appearing only as Hero, (unit type),(unit stats). Likewise, Hero unit players looking to log into a game could only see how many RTS players are involved, the map they're playing on, and how long the match has been going on. There would be no communications available in the Hero unit players' lobby, and regular old school battle.net communication available in the RTS players' lobby.
Mind you, there would need to be a new version of Starcraft with a much more complete physics engine to make this work... and Starcraft 2 ruins my whole concept >.<