If you could only have one --> Gears of War 3 or Halo Reach

Lord_Panzer

Impractically practical
Feb 6, 2009
1,107
0
0
Reach has jetpacks, therefore Reach wins. Space lasers be damned.

[sub][sub]Seriously, nobody's said that yet?[/sub][/sub]
 

TheButteryGoodness

New member
Sep 9, 2008
180
0
0
SenorFuzzeh said:
TheButteryGoodness said:
SenorFuzzeh said:
SenorFuzzeh said:
By using the same gameplay as Halo1, 2, 3, AND ODST?

Btw how does a game reclaim a throne from itself? Doesnt it already have its throne?
Well you could say the same things about gears 3. gears 1 was shooting bland looking aliens with big generic guns (few exceptions like the torque bow), and gears 2 was just more of the same. do you really belive that gears 3 will make any significant changes to the formula at this point?
Even if they didnt I still loved the formula. Considering it tended to be a very flexible formula.

I seriously feel no difference when I play Call of Duty (or any other run-n-gun) compared to Halo. Execpt COD has a good story, and the weapons dont feel like their made of plastic, and rather than just smack people repeatably with the end of your gun, youd get knife.


(Imma end this here. Cuz we can all have out own opinions, and Im seriously not in the mood to argue)
fair enough, I guess it dose come down to personal tastes, and sorry if I came across as trying to start an argument, that was not my intention.
 

TheSapphireKnight

I hate Dire Wolves...
Dec 4, 2008
692
0
0
I like Gears campaign and Co-Op. Can't stand the multiplayer though. I love Halo everything so that would be a much safer bet for me.
 

SenorFuzzeh

New member
May 14, 2009
197
0
0
TheButteryGoodness said:
fair enough, I guess it dose come down to personal tastes, and sorry if I came across as trying to start an argument, that was not my intention.
Nah, if anything i've been coming off as a jerk. Lots and lots of crap going on these days. My bad.
 

BakaSmurf

Elite Member
Dec 25, 2008
1,323
0
41
I would go for Reach myself, but then again, I've played and enjoyed the Beta, and I've never cared for Gears of War, it suffers way too badly from severe testosterone poisoning for my tastes.

So... Yeah, I'm largely biased here, so my opinion might not matter much here.
 

Sightless Wisdom

Resident Cynic
Jul 24, 2009
2,552
0
0
I'd have to say Reach. I know it's multiplayer will be supported and played by a large community for a long time which means more entertainment value.
 

OblivionRegained

New member
Nov 13, 2008
137
0
0
Anyone who thinks Halo: Reach is doing anything new and interesting is deluded. It will be the same boring run n gun shooter with what? Jetpacks etc? Jesus Bungie are so fucking devoid of ideas they are ripping off Volitions (a far superior developer) Red Faction Guerrilla multiplayer. The only difference is its FPS rather than Third Person... Oh and Red Faction had destruction Bungie 0 - Volition 2.

Now for Gears... What can i say, what a piece of awesome. Gotta hand it to Epic, being a big fan of Unreal over the years, i did not think they could make a huge departure from twitch shooter awesomeness. I was gladly wrong. The world and story they created is quite amazing, the Gothic architecture is fantastic. Not forgetting the whole back story of it. At least it is fleshed out a bit, unlike Halos weak storyline.

Bah i dont care anymore. Im tired and the footy is on soon... Gears is my choice, quite obviously... :p
 

AvsJoe

Elite Member
May 28, 2009
9,055
0
41
I'll take Reach. I'm not much of a fan of the Gears series and I have always loved Halo multi-player. Though I doubt I'll ever own either in my lifetime.
 

SenorFuzzeh

New member
May 14, 2009
197
0
0
OblivionRegained said:
Anyone who thinks Halo: Reach is doing anything new and interesting is deluded. It will be the same boring run n gun shooter with what? Jetpacks etc? Jesus Bungie are so fucking devoid of ideas they are ripping off Volitions (a far superior developer) Red Faction Guerrilla multiplayer. The only difference is its FPS rather than Third Person... Oh and Red Faction had destruction Bungie 0 - Volition 2.

Now for Gears... What can i say, what a piece of awesome. Gotta hand it to Epic, being a big fan of Unreal over the years, i did not think they could make a huge departure from twitch shooter awesomeness. I was gladly wrong. The world and story they created is quite amazing, the Gothic architecture is fantastic. Not forgetting the whole back story of it. At least it is fleshed out a bit, unlike Halos weak storyline.

Bah i dont care anymore. Im tired and the footy is on soon... Gears is my choice, quite obviously... :p
I'd jump through the air and slow-motion-epic-high-five you if I could, Good sir.

I loved halo when I first played it on my xbox, so Dont think I'm biast or anything. And I actually enjoyed ODST, considering it changed a few things and had great music. (Okay,I'll give halo that, it has an AMAZING soundtrack)
 

Miles Tormani

New member
Jul 30, 2008
471
0
0
I would rather get Killzone 3 over Gears of War 3.

Why? Simple reasons, really. I enjoyed Killzone 2 more than Gears 2. I'll pause a bit so you can take that in. Also, Killzone 3 has jetpacks, which make any game instantly more awesome. EDIT: I'd even go so far as to claim that Sonic '06 may have been somewhat playable if they gave the hedgehog a jetpack. Tails doesn't count.

Halo: Reach has jetpacks, space lasers, the Metroid hand pound invincibility thing, and newly revealed: space battles? Yeah, apparently Bungie got so fed up waiting for a new Star Fox game that they did it themselves. That better be a matchmaking mode. I haven't been able to blast people online in Arwings in years.

Do a barrel roll.
 

HigherTomorrow

New member
Jan 24, 2010
649
0
0
Neither. Give me Rising, Black Ops, or pretty much any of the "Retro" games revealed at Nintendo's E3. Hell, I'll even take Little Big Planet 2.

And of course, Portal 2.

However, if I HAD to pick, it'd be Halo Reach, only because I hate Gears :)
 

RowdyRodimus

New member
Apr 24, 2010
1,154
0
0
Radeonx said:
You have around 7 months to get the money to pre-order Gears 3 after you get Reach, so why don't you save up some?
Do this. Saving $10 a month isn't that hard to do, heck you can put a little more than a quarter a day in a can and have it by the time it comes out and not miss the money.
 

Nouw

New member
Mar 18, 2009
15,615
0
0
I'm sure you can afford to get both. Just get more money. Pre-ordering isn't the only way to get games you know
 

Roscoe_A

New member
Aug 6, 2009
161
0
0
I would go Gears of War 3

After Halo 3 I fell off the band wagon for Halo. I don't know why but I just don't enjoy it anymore.

Gears of War I enjoy more because it is something different for me. I normally play FPS but an occasional Third Person Shooter with a whole lot of blood is nice.

So yeah Gears of War 3
 

Omikron009

New member
May 22, 2009
3,817
0
0
I'd have to go with Halo Reach. I like the Gears of War series, but I've never been a huge fan.
 

spectrenihlus

New member
Feb 4, 2010
1,918
0
0
Reach, I just have never been able to get into Gears multiplayer (too many people rolling around with shotguns) but I love Horde mode but I would rather have reach.