Rethinking it, the bullet would fire out at 2000km/h regardless but the shooter's velocity in the opposite direction would have to increase also.Berethond said:snipsnip
42 buckets divided by 0?IrishBerserker said:According to Richard from LFG the meaning of life is bucket.Da pyro man 999 said:Befor you ask the most obvious one, the meaning to life is 42(hitch hickers guide to the galaxy)come up with one.
but he fired backwards so he'd just shoot himselfeffilctar said:Rethinking it, the bullet would fire out at 2000km/h regardless but the shooter's velocity in the opposite direction would have to increase also.Berethond said:snipsnip
Errr... it falls directly to the ground?Yuriatayde said:OT: If you have a gun that shoots bullets at exactly 2000km/h, and you were on a platform moving you exactly 2000km/h, and you fired the gun backwards... What would happen?
You Cannot divide by 0 because if there is zero it dosent exist?Gaderael said:Solve this a unmake the universe!!!
Can you divide by zero? How?
I'm not sure if that's true. I've never understood the desire for such power myself.coldshadow said:To many people like to have power, so the odds are greatly tipped against communismAkai Shizuku said:First statement is true, second is not.coldshadow said:it hasnt been properly practiced yet, nor will it ever be.Akai Shizuku said:"Didn't Communism fail?"
Hm? I'm a Computer Science undergrad, so I have a fairly solid background in mathematics. Anyway, the mathematics were not what I was disputing. I was merely inferring that statements based on impossibility/possibility based on perceived truths (truth is not to be confused with fact) are inherently ridiculous. In terms of the mathematical side of things, I am actually inclined to agree with you.Trivun said:Have you ever read a maths book? This isn't me saying it's not true because I believe it isn't true. I made a mathematical statement. I can prove it. I have proved it before, I learned how to prove it, and I can do so again. Hence it must be that what I said was true, because I can prove that it is true. You have obviously never studied maths beyond the most basic level, otherwise you would understand my point. No offence meant, but what I said is not ridiculous in any way whatsoever.
That's easy. Start with a non-Archimedean numbering system where infinitesimals exist. If 0.0...1 is actually a defined number, then triviallyTrivun said:0.9 recurring (that is, nines going on forever after the decimal point) does not equal 1. This is impossible, because it's untrue. The to numbers are indeed equal. Yeah. So anyone who posted on that maths thread ages ago and disputed that, I'd like to see you prove your point to a Maths undergraduate. Hah. I bet you can't, can you?![]()
They have rest-mass. I think the word you're searching for is momentum. After all, if photons couldn't interact with anything then we wouldn't see anything.Berethond said:Untrue, photons do have mass. That's where the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle comes in, you cannot know the location and velocity of a sub-atomic particle at the same time. That's because one or the other changes when hit by a photon.traski999 said:Nothing only light can move at the speed of light (ironic no?) and light has no mass... it'd pass right through.GHMonkey said:What happens when two object going light speed collide?
Answer:Gravity pulls our souls together, but then rip it may pull us apart.Da Joz said:Why do fools fall in love?
Fraught said:Who farted in 2536 B.C on 15th October at 15:24:57 in China?
Also, how many people fart at that time?
OptimusPrime33 said:ME!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! DUN DUN DUUUUUUUUUUUUNNNNN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! also 984,233 people in China farted including me at the same time
twostripe gave me a more plausible quantity of farters. But still, the court demands decisive evidence, what you two are lacking, severely.twostripe said:Hu Flung Pu farted along with 97 other people
No. I don't have a wife.Hallow said:Have you beaten your wife recently?
JedamethisVeX1le said:What is your name?
What is your quest?
What is your favorite color?
Or: How many warlocks can a murloc stunlock if a murloc can stunlock warlocks?quiet_samurai said:How much wood could a coodchuck chuck if a woodchuck could chuck wood?
DAMMIT, I HATE THAT QUESTION.Biek said:Has anyone really been far even as decided to use even go want to do look more like?