I shall answer this question thusly!twostripe said:WHENTWOTRIBESGOTOWAR said:My friend here always lies, and he says I always tell the truth... who is correct?
i like this one but i never truly figured it out
"I think, therefore I am." (You in this case)D4zZ said:Not an impossible question just very improbable to get correct.Connosaurus Rex said:what is the answer to the question I'm thinking of right this moment.
OT: Do I exist?
Impossible.daxter101 said:square root of -1 = ?
I believe the common variation is "Can God create a rock he cannot lift".katsa5 said:Would that be a relevent question? God is a limitless being, and the question assumes that he has to abide by the rules of limitations of Earth. I mean, this is a God that can be everywhere yet nowhere at the same time. To understand the answer, we have to place ourselves into the "Limitless Environment" of God. And that's something we, as humans, are so beyond our experience that we can't even imagine it.PimpinAngel said:Could God heat a burrito so much, that He Himself could not eat it?
(you receive nothing for reference!)
There's an answer to that one, actually. The answer is: No, he couldn't. He can pose any question, sure, but he can also answer every question. "A question which an all-knowing creature doesn't know the answer wo" is a pointless sentence, since you, by saying he's all knowing, say that he does know all answers. You might as well say "Invisible green ideas sleep furiously". It can be said, yes, but it doesn't make sense. Like asfhasjaf or sfasfsdfwefw, it's nonsense.Spacelord said:So God is all-knowing, right?
He's also omnipotent, yes?
Then could God pose a question even he doesn't know the answer to?
[small](Please don't flame me.)[/small]
That would be i. Please do not start a discussion about imaginary numbers.daxter101 said:square root of -1 = ?
where are the Snowdens of yesteryear?FalloutJack said:Here's a classic reference...
Why is Hitler? Who is Spain?
Firstly, yes, you can daydream at night. It's daytime on the other side of the earth. ;-PThePoodonkis said:the Ultimate Answer to Life, The Universe, and Everything is 42.fix-the-spade said:It is NOT THE MEANING OF LIFE damnit.Da pyro man 999 said:Befor you ask the most obvious one, the meaning to life is 42(hitch hickers guide to the galaxy)come up with one.
It's the ultimate answer, the thing is, what is the ultimate question?
The Ultimate Question: What do you get when you multiply six and nine?
Can you daydream at night?
No they do not. For something to attain the speed of light while having mass it would require an infinite amount of energy because the mass of the object reaches infinity. Photons act as a particle and a wave but are mass-less.Berethond said:Untrue, photons do have mass. That's where the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle comes in, you cannot know the location and velocity of a sub-atomic particle at the same time. That's because one or the other changes when hit by a photon.traski999 said:Nothing only light can move at the speed of light (ironic no?) and light has no mass... it'd pass right through.GHMonkey said:What happens when two object going light speed collide?
Learn Hypnosis.Hellskull said:There is no valid answer for this one:
"How does Hellskull get a girlfriend without paying/killing/threatening anyone?"
How do you know so much about swallows?Lukeje said:I don't know that!happysock said:African or European?Lukeje said:What... is the air-speed velocity of an unladen swallow?
*Aaaaaaaaaaaargh!*
They have rest-mass... and they also have momentum.traski999 said:No they do not. For something to attain the speed of light while having mass it would require an infinite amount of energy because the mass of the object reaches infinity. Photons act as a particle and a wave but are mass-less.Berethond said:Untrue, photons do have mass. That's where the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle comes in, you cannot know the location and velocity of a sub-atomic particle at the same time. That's because one or the other changes when hit by a photon.traski999 said:Nothing only light can move at the speed of light (ironic no?) and light has no mass... it'd pass right through.GHMonkey said:What happens when two object going light speed collide?
The Momentum of the photon is attained by the equation p=(h/2pi)k which has nothing to do with mass at all. Further the photons "rest-mass" is derived from the equation E=mc^2 which if you take the energy of a singe photon and divide it by the speed of light in a vacuum squared (approximately 9 x 10^16 m/s) it is going to be such a small number that it is irrelevant.Lukeje said:They have rest-mass... and they also have momentum.traski999 said:No they do not. For something to attain the speed of light while having mass it would require an infinite amount of energy because the mass of the object reaches infinity. Photons act as a particle and a wave but are mass-less.Berethond said:Untrue, photons do have mass. That's where the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle comes in, you cannot know the location and velocity of a sub-atomic particle at the same time. That's because one or the other changes when hit by a photon.traski999 said:Nothing only light can move at the speed of light (ironic no?) and light has no mass... it'd pass right through.GHMonkey said:What happens when two object going light speed collide?