That's easy enough. Just tell them "that opinion is bigoted because..." There was even a point in the previous CoC about attacking the opinion not the person. Here it is: http://archive.is/SSJ8t#selection-1301.549-1301.840Saelune said:A major issue I have here is that alot of the times, people will say something bigoted, and go 'I dont understand why people disagree with me' and the proper response would be 'Because you're a bigot' But I cannot say that so bluntly. WW allowed the removal of pretenses.
A few times I thought about just doing a super callout thread and just be like 'You're a bigot, you're racist, you're sexist' and specify user by user. Oh well. I guess I will have to save that for my own 'FU Im out' topic, but for the time being, I still don't want to be banned.
Tippy's RL concerns are keeping him too busy to fully attend to his Mod duties. He decided to lighten his work load so now he's helping out as a spambot whacker. We hope/expect him to return to full Mod status eventually.Marik2 said:Tippy is no longer a mod? I was about to PM him about this.
Why? That topic made them no friends. Even people who don't like me defended me.Marik2 said:I'm sad that Saelune can no longer tell off chocolate pickles in the call out thread.
And I was waiting for to respond to the trans thread.
Nah, I got a warning for doing that too.Johnlives said:That's easy enough. Just tell them "that opinion is bigoted because..." There was even a point in the previous CoC about attacking the opinion not the person. Here it is: http://archive.is/SSJ8t#selection-1301.549-1301.840Saelune said:A major issue I have here is that alot of the times, people will say something bigoted, and go 'I dont understand why people disagree with me' and the proper response would be 'Because you're a bigot' But I cannot say that so bluntly. WW allowed the removal of pretenses.
A few times I thought about just doing a super callout thread and just be like 'You're a bigot, you're racist, you're sexist' and specify user by user. Oh well. I guess I will have to save that for my own 'FU Im out' topic, but for the time being, I still don't want to be banned.
This way you can essentially call the person a bigot, or whatever, without actually attacking them directly, only the comment. That's why people frequently complain about the passive aggresive stuff.
The Wild West was refreshing as we could skip this pretense.
Well, you have got yourself a reputation.Saelune said:Nah, I got a warning for doing that too.Johnlives said:That's easy enough. Just tell them "that opinion is bigoted because..." There was even a point in the previous CoC about attacking the opinion not the person. Here it is: http://archive.is/SSJ8t#selection-1301.549-1301.840Saelune said:A major issue I have here is that alot of the times, people will say something bigoted, and go 'I dont understand why people disagree with me' and the proper response would be 'Because you're a bigot' But I cannot say that so bluntly. WW allowed the removal of pretenses.
A few times I thought about just doing a super callout thread and just be like 'You're a bigot, you're racist, you're sexist' and specify user by user. Oh well. I guess I will have to save that for my own 'FU Im out' topic, but for the time being, I still don't want to be banned.
This way you can essentially call the person a bigot, or whatever, without actually attacking them directly, only the comment. That's why people frequently complain about the passive aggresive stuff.
The Wild West was refreshing as we could skip this pretense.
Damned if I do, damned if I don't. Admittedly, the reputation goes to my head sometimes. I don't feel guilty for any of it though. There are worse reputations to have.Johnlives said:Well, you have got yourself a reputation.Saelune said:Nah, I got a warning for doing that too.Johnlives said:That's easy enough. Just tell them "that opinion is bigoted because..." There was even a point in the previous CoC about attacking the opinion not the person. Here it is: http://archive.is/SSJ8t#selection-1301.549-1301.840Saelune said:A major issue I have here is that alot of the times, people will say something bigoted, and go 'I dont understand why people disagree with me' and the proper response would be 'Because you're a bigot' But I cannot say that so bluntly. WW allowed the removal of pretenses.
A few times I thought about just doing a super callout thread and just be like 'You're a bigot, you're racist, you're sexist' and specify user by user. Oh well. I guess I will have to save that for my own 'FU Im out' topic, but for the time being, I still don't want to be banned.
This way you can essentially call the person a bigot, or whatever, without actually attacking them directly, only the comment. That's why people frequently complain about the passive aggresive stuff.
The Wild West was refreshing as we could skip this pretense.
Black Jesus?! [https://images-na.ssl-images-amazon.com/images/I/714JVhQfRIL._RI_.jpg] I thought it was in development hell! Its been like 3 years since the last season!lacktheknack said:Y'all still need Jesus.
Jesus?crimson5pheonix said:
There hasn't been any changes to the CoC, or we all would have had to re-agree again.Canadamus Prime said:I'm pretty sure the rules have been amended since Defy all but abandoned the site. In any event the mods are the only ones left who can do anything. Why don't you volunteer to join the moderation team? That way you'll have a say in what goes on around here. I'd do it, but I don't want to deal with the stress.
Actually there has, "Low Content Posts" used to be an infraction offense, but that was removed from the CoC. That's honestly the only example I can pull from memory right now, but that's still a change, however small. Also I've had a few sites change their ToS where the continued use of the site constituted an agreement to the new ToS, so you can consider your continued usage of The Escapist forums as your agreement to the changes the CoC has undergone.Drathnoxis said:There hasn't been any changes to the CoC, or we all would have had to re-agree again.
The keyword was "since Defy all but abandoned the site." Those were part of the changes enacted by n0e a little while after he took over as CM. And we did re-agree at that time.Dr. Thrax said:Actually there has, "Low Content Posts" used to be an infraction offense, but that was removed from the CoC. That's honestly the only example I can pull from memory right now, but that's still a change, however small. Also I've had a few sites change their ToS and the continued use of the site constituted an agreement to the new ToS, so you can consider your continued usage of The Escapist forums as your agreement to the changes the CoC has undergone.Drathnoxis said:There hasn't been any changes to the CoC, or we all would have had to re-agree again.
I still have all the ones I made saved. I think yours might have been the best one I did.MrCalavera said:I still have my "bleached" avatar saved somewhere. First time someone edited it for me, and it came out really neat.
No, that's why it's cordoned off in a subforum that doesn't show up in recent posts. Shamus Young's site doesn't allow R&P discussion and the atmosphere and level of discourse over there is generally much better than here.Elvis Starburst said:Was politics ever actually a good idea to host on a gaming forum? Maybe back in the day, but in this kind of current internet and political climate, it sure doesn't sound like fun nowPointlessKnowledge said:I was referring more to the general terrible attitude of people from R&P. Most of the call-out threads start from user interactions there.
To put it as a pleasant metaphor: R&P is Ipecac and WW is a toilet. Removing the toilet doesn't get rid of the oncoming vomit, and now there is no place for it to go.
I wrangled the answer out of Caramel a couple months agoJohnlives said:My mistake, I thought in the thread at the time the badge arrived it was mentioned that they would happen by user action as other badges. I guess you'd know better as one of the anointed.Saelune said:That badge became unobtainable when Frappe bailed. Apparently it was a badge that was manually awarded by Frappe and not something you can 'trigger' by specific actions on the site, unlike say, watching Zero Punctuation videos.Johnlives said:You're also going to upset the badge hunter group as they will not be able to get the Deviant badge.
Dang, beat me to it!SupahEwok said:Buddy, have I got news for you. [http://www.escapistmagazine.com/forums/read/706.1025983-Poll-Poll-Should-R-P-Continue-to-Exist?]PointlessKnowledge said:Maybe we should have a poll that will be ignored by the mods and the CM.
No we wouldn't have. I'm pretty sure it's been amended several times since I joined, back when we still had a staff to do that, and I don't recall ever having to re-agree to anything.Drathnoxis said:There hasn't been any changes to the CoC, or we all would have had to re-agree again.Canadamus Prime said:I'm pretty sure the rules have been amended since Defy all but abandoned the site. In any event the mods are the only ones left who can do anything. Why don't you volunteer to join the moderation team? That way you'll have a say in what goes on around here. I'd do it, but I don't want to deal with the stress.
The mods do not, nor have they ever accepted volunteer offers to the moderation team. It's even been stated that volunteering is likely to reduce your chances.
Sounds to me like if you think this is the place for dank memes you already think this place is shit.American Tanker said:So let me guess: With the Wild West gone, if I posted a "Falcon Punch" meme thread, it would be locked and deleted before it got any responses.
If so, well, yeah, this site's going to wind up in the shitter.
We need another Erinposting thread you mean.lacktheknack said:Y'all still need Jesus.