I think it's something like the "Westermarck effect".Kopikatsu said:Technically, you're genetically coded to have a strong sexual attraction to blood relatives. I forget the name of it, but there's a thing where if you stay around the same people for the first few stages of life (Either four months or four years), then that drops off completely and it turns into a kind of familial love as opposed to sexual. Really wish I could remember the name of it.
Balls, beaten to the punch.Quaxar said:Also called the <url=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Westermarck_effect>Westermarck effect, just to mention that name too.
This is kind of blown out of proportion because incest doesn't cause genetic disabilities in children. But if one of the parents is a carrier for a genetic condition then it's likely the other would be as well since they're related, increasing the odds of the child having it. Now mind you, genetic diversity is good for the survival of the species, in part for that reason, but it's a bit silly to use that as the basis of disallowing incest these days given what we know about genetics and what not. Not to mention a few people having babies with family (and I doubt I can stress how rare this would be enough) isn't exactly going to risk destroying the entire human population.Keoul said:The whole reason incest was shunned in the first place was because of the genetic disabilities it causes right? that shouldn't be as likely in cousins.
Emma Watson has the creepiest fans, I would know. I am a fanSmashLovesTitanQuest said:Is my sisters name Emma Watson?
No?
No incest for me then.
Now, is that what you truly think or is it because you're a part of a user group that tries to start flame wars when they notice a potentially flamey thread?Evil Smurf said:Emma Watson has the creepiest fans, I would know. I am a fanSmashLovesTitanQuest said:Is my sisters name Emma Watson?
No?
No incest for me then.
as long as it is consensual with both parties the go for it!
Well, I agree with this to a certain point... if you're adults, do what you want sexually but for crying out loud, don't have kids. A) That kid is going to get genetically screwed because you took it upon yourself to screw your genetics, B) The kid is going to start asking questions when the other kid's dad isn't their uncle as well and C) That kid is going to get bullied. Hard.Imperator_DK said:What consenting adults do that involves only themselves, is nobody's business but their own.
No, I really think that. I am a pretty open guy. That user group is not that bad eitherSassafrass said:Now, is that what you truly think or is it because you're a part of a user group that tries to start flame wars when they notice a potentially flamey thread?Evil Smurf said:Emma Watson has the creepiest fans, I would know. I am a fanSmashLovesTitanQuest said:Is my sisters name Emma Watson?
No?
No incest for me then.
as long as it is consensual with both parties the go for it!
OT: Ew and fuck no are my answers.
Ok, just curious as I've never seen you be that open about anything on the site.Evil Smurf said:No, I really think that. I am a pretty open guy. That user group is not that bad eitherSassafrass said:Now, is that what you truly think or is it because you're a part of a user group that tries to start flame wars when they notice a potentially flamey thread?Evil Smurf said:Emma Watson has the creepiest fans, I would know. I am a fanSmashLovesTitanQuest said:Is my sisters name Emma Watson?
No?
No incest for me then.
as long as it is consensual with both parties the go for it!
OT: Ew and fuck no are my answers.
You, sir, A) Stole my answer, and B) Get a cookie. That was golden!SmashLovesTitanQuest said:Is my sisters name Emma Watson?
No?
No incest for me then.