I disagree. When I purchase a game at retail and am denied access to said game due to issues spawned by DRM and poor system set up - I am quite within my rights to obtain a copy that does work.Prof. Monkeypox said:Don't pirate. There's no excuse for it.
That said- when companies come off as friendly and helpful, it makes people feel even less justified about piracy than they were otherwise.
Well in vinegar's defense...Phlakes said:It's such an old principle. People respond better to rewards than punishment.
Flies and honey and all that.
Although it's not really a reward, but it's the same idea.
If EA didn't learn from Spore being the most pirated game of 2008, they won't learn. Reality simply does not mean anything to them.gigastar said:Itll be interesting to see how that turns out in the future.
With a shit-ton of luck, maybe EA and Capcom will pick up that DRM is not always a good thing.
Perhaps indeed. If you're spending huge amounts on the DRM, why not just spend it to reward honest customers? A couple of little tricks can identify pirates quite nicely unless they know what exactly they're looking for.Perhaps those hardcore DRM schemes we've seen elsewhere aren't such a good idea after all?
It's sort of there, but not really. They've said that the DRM is a date check, to make sure the game is not played before the release date. After that, it's worthless.Fatal-X said:From what I heard CD Project's Witcher 2 will have DRM. That is, if you won't buy it from GOG.RanD00M said:This is what CD Projeckt Red believes, and from what I've read on /v/, who seem to hate games by the way, most of them are going to buy it instead of pirating it, which is something special.
I agree that there is no point in adding DRM to the games, pirates will pirate the game anyways. Waste of money and time.