Smuggling drugs on Interstate 10? Brilliant. Nobody would ever be suspicious of someone driving 1500 miles along the Mexican border.
PC drug-smuggling master race! Woo!blackrave said:Don't want to start console wars, but you never read articles with titles like
"Inept Smuggler Hides Cocaine in PC"
Just saying...
Pffft, that's nothing. I cover mine in methamphetamine and simply speed past the cops so they don't have time to see what's on the back seat.ThePenguinKnight said:Idiots.
I smuggle my cocaine in larger bags of pot, they'll never suspect a thing. hehehehe.
I give them the finger that way they see how unpleasant I am so that they'll avoid me.lacktheknack said:Pffft, that's nothing. I cover mine in methamphetamine and simply speed past the cops so they don't have time to see what's on the back seat.ThePenguinKnight said:Idiots.
I smuggle my cocaine in larger bags of pot, they'll never suspect a thing. hehehehe.
Even better, try firing a gun at them so they'll go away faster.ThePenguinKnight said:I give them the finger that way they see how unpleasant I am so that they'll avoid me.lacktheknack said:Pffft, that's nothing. I cover mine in methamphetamine and simply speed past the cops so they don't have time to see what's on the back seat.ThePenguinKnight said:Idiots.
I smuggle my cocaine in larger bags of pot, they'll never suspect a thing. hehehehe.
No, I get the logic of the police serving a warning in person being better than trying to mail. What I mean is that here in the UK the police wouldn't even bother to mail a driver for not indicating, they wouldn't do anything. Its just not considered that big a thing.Treblaine said:-snip-
Really seems amazing compared to the fact that possession of class A here in the UK gets you like... 2 years? There's a drug runner attending the same college as me, and the police have put away all his buddies. He, himself apparently has a court hearing at some point and the evidence seems pretty fucking steep. While I'll admit it's a shame he's balls'd up his life (absolutely no job prospects after something like this, etc, he'll end up having to live the rest of his life as a dealer, which he didn't want to do) he's still a fucking idiot and I can't feel sorry for him. It'll just be simpler for everyone when he goes away. Besides all that, he's a wanker anyway. Not that I'd wish that fate on someone for being a bit of a dick, but he's brought this on himself.DustyDrB said:I heard somewhere that that's a hell of a drug.I think (keyword:shameduser said:15 to 99 years in prison? WTF that's a long time."I'm ill-informed and really have no place making this commentary""think") that the punishment is steep because they are really trying to be extra hard on drug-trafficking in Texas due to the overall situation around the border. Drug-trafficking goes behind drug-trafficking. It's a very bloody business.
Well the reason cars have indicator lights, and the law requires they always be used is you don't know if you need them to not be dangerous. If they are in the habit of not indicating when they make a turn then they won't be in the habit when it is dangerous as they can't look every direction at once (and very limited vision to the rear) it's good they are encouraged as strongly as possible. The law is the law, you HAVE to indicate and a talking-to and a ticket will hopefully get that to sink in.Fasckira said:No, I get the logic of the police serving a warning in person being better than trying to mail. What I mean is that here in the UK the police wouldn't even bother to mail a driver for not indicating, they wouldn't do anything. Its just not considered that big a thing.Treblaine said:-snip-
I think the only time the police would pull someone in the UK for not indicating is if they had endangered other road users (like cutting someone up on the motorway or similar).
Well, they are pretty light, so I wouldn't be surprised. Although the big giveaway would be when someone realizes your 360 weighs more than 3 pieces of paper.superbatranger said:I'd be more impressed if the 360 still worked.
Put drugs with spare wheel under boot (AKA trunk for yanks)Therumancer said:... and yet it's not enough because people keep doing stuff like this.shameduser said:15 to 99 years in prison? WTF that's a long time.
To be honest I suspect the guy won't get anywhere near that, the guy is apparently a mule and he'll probably wind up being asked to trade whoever he was porting the drugs for, in exchange for a lower sentence.
Also the cop's story reeks of bullshit, the guy "nervously eyeing the package next to him" during a "routine traffic stop" that just happens to have that much coke? I'd imagine the cop actually got a tip, pulled the guy over, and is using that as an excuse for searching the vehicle to the extent he did. Don't get me wrong, I think the cops should be able to search cars like this, and the search and seizure laws (the way they are interpeted and practiced) are ridiculous, BUT when it goes to court any lawyer worth a crap is going to be all over how the cop justified searching the vehicle... the claim seems rather weak.
I also have to wonder about the brown paper bag that was so obvious, a guy smart enough to divulge the game box cover (in case of a search) doesn't seem like he would have pakced things like that. It makes me wonder about drugs being planted to justify checking the X-box (knowing what he was using as cover, given the tip), or if the guy was under pressure from his boss to run more material than he was able to properly cover, which means he's more than likely going to be willing to cop a deal.
This is all speculation of course, it's just what I think. I doubt he's going to wind up facing the full potential penelties. The authorities probably have an interest in not having the case fully challenged in court due to the search, and the guy in question seems to be in a perfect position to turn on the people who he works for, because if THEY screwed up any other criminal contacts probably won't blame him if he was made to try and transport more drugs than his set up could safely handle.
I suppose it's a different country but if you don't signal here in australia (sydney) your a gonna, they will book and fine you, you may even loose points off your licence (then again you may be lucky and get off with a warning) (then again you can be booked for going 1km over the speed limit but most won't book unless you go 5km over)shintakie10 said:Willin to be cop talk. Unless its a local county law, I don't think I've ever heard of an actual law that states you have to signal before a turn and if there is it almost never is enforced. Also given the way traffic court judges are, if a cop bothered them with somethin ridiculous as not signalin a turn they'd throw the case out and tell them not to waste their time.Formica Archonis said:Failed to signal? That's either a police officer far from making quota this month or cop talk for "I knew something was up and I needed an excuse to pull him over."Grey Carter said:Carols Valenuela and his friend Charlie - who weighs exactly 1.8kg and is enormously popular at parties - were taking a drive through Texas, when they were pulled over after Carlos failed to signal a turn as an intersection.
.
Hmm, source makes pretty clear it was for a traffic violation.algalon said:And ya, I'd question the legality of the arrest. Texas is rather notorious for pulling people over for almost any reason they could think of. Cop's ass itches? Wind blows in an east-westerly direction? That's intuition! Pull over the next car I see! Glad I don't live there.
at-last we know why they fail so often they run out of cocaine and cant bare the thought of living any longer.Grey Carter said:Me too, a classic 360 that hasn't red ringed yet? Unheard of.superbatranger said:I'd be more impressed if the 360 still worked.
*baddumtum etc*