They could be doing Vietnam [http://www.escapistmagazine.com/news/view/91428-Rumor-Next-Call-of-Duty-In-Nam], to be fair.pigeon_of_doom said:Telling us fans what we want to hear without being too specific. Not reading too much into this, but I'm already confident it'll be a great experience, which Treyarch will parrot in a WW2 setting in their game's release the year after.
Never saw that news article. Good news I suppose. While I think their games have been decent, maybe a fresh setting will help them find the originality they've always seemed somewhat lacking in to me. Although I doubt they'll be able to pull off the kind of morally ambigous, disturbed game that may be able to do that war justice.CantFaketheFunk said:They could be doing Vietnam [http://www.escapistmagazine.com/news/view/91428-Rumor-Next-Call-of-Duty-In-Nam], to be fair.
Eh with any FPS though it is kinda hard to drag out the game because you move so fast though the environment. Unless it's a story based game with artificial stops along the gameplay(ie forcing you to look for something or wait for an event) then most FPS's are doing good to get 5 hours gametime. Halo1-3 HL2 goldeneye, fear, timesplitters1-3, star wars battlefield, doom, quake, and the CODs all come in under 5 hours(halo 1 being 2 1/2 hours long) So if this comes in at 5-7-10 hours I'll be happy.Mirroga said:If they cut story mode's length below 10 hours, then it isn't worth my buck. I only play console games for non-online story modes.
Over-hype any game and people get unrealistic expectations and get disappointed. Game companies generally over-compensate their game with hyping. It happens a lot.Flap Jack452 said:Explain?Jonny49 said:As much as I loved cod4, I can see this bieng a disapointment.
Too bad no one cares what the disgracefully disbarred Wacko Jacko thinks anymore, eh? At least, we can only hope.Cpt_Oblivious said:I sense another Hot Coffee incident. Jack Thompson will love this.CantFaketheFunk said:And now, to poke fun at the ambiguities of the English language: Notice that "best f**king / experience" and "best / f**king experience" are two completely different things. I wonder what else IW has in store for Modern Warfare 2, eh?
I just don't think it can live up to the first one. Cod4 was fresh, mind blowing and long lasting. I still think MW2 will be good, just not as good as believed. How can they top the nuke going off in cod4?Flap Jack452 said:Explain?Jonny49 said:As much as I loved cod4, I can see this bieng a disapointment.
Like thisJonny49 said:I just don't think it can live up to the first one. Cod4 was fresh, mind blowing and long lasting. I still think MW2 will be good, just not as good as believed. How can they top the nuke going off in cod4?Flap Jack452 said:Explain?Jonny49 said:As much as I loved cod4, I can see this bieng a disapointment.
Hardcore interactive sex scenes?Jonny49 said:I just don't think it can live up to the first one. Cod4 was fresh, mind blowing and long lasting. I still think MW2 will be good, just not as good as believed. How can they top the nuke going off in cod4?Flap Jack452 said:Explain?Jonny49 said:As much as I loved cod4, I can see this bieng a disapointment.
2 nukes?Jonny49 said:I just don't think it can live up to the first one. Cod4 was fresh, mind blowing and long lasting. I still think MW2 will be good, just not as good as believed. How can they top the nuke going off in cod4?Flap Jack452 said:Explain?Jonny49 said:As much as I loved cod4, I can see this bieng a disapointment.
sharks9 said:2 nukes?Jonny49 said:I just don't think it can live up to the first one. Cod4 was fresh, mind blowing and long lasting. I still think MW2 will be good, just not as good as believed. How can they top the nuke going off in cod4?Flap Jack452 said:Explain?Jonny49 said:As much as I loved cod4, I can see this bieng a disapointment.
Two nukes having sex!Cliff_m85 said:Hardcore interactive sex scenes?Jonny49 said:I just don't think it can live up to the first one. Cod4 was fresh, mind blowing and long lasting. I still think MW2 will be good, just not as good as believed. How can they top the nuke going off in cod4?Flap Jack452 said:Explain?Jonny49 said:As much as I loved cod4, I can see this bieng a disapointment.
Halo 1 was definitely not 2 1/2 hours long. It wasn't huge, but it was a damn sight bigger than that. And Half Life 2 had a good 7-10 hours depending on skill and difficulty level, probably a bit more.sneakypenguin said:Eh with any FPS though it is kinda hard to drag out the game because you move so fast though the environment. Unless it's a story based game with artificial stops along the gameplay(ie forcing you to look for something or wait for an event) then most FPS's are doing good to get 5 hours gametime. Halo1-3 HL2 goldeneye, fear, timesplitters1-3, star wars battlefield, doom, quake, and the CODs all come in under 5 hours(halo 1 being 2 1/2 hours long) So if this comes in at 5-7-10 hours I'll be happy.Mirroga said:If they cut story mode's length below 10 hours, then it isn't worth my buck. I only play console games for non-online story modes.
That level took me weeks to complete.I got like 2 checkpoints through the wholething.Stylish_Robot said:as long as they don't have another War Room level on Veteran. Difficult's one thing, but that level was just bad
Oh, youCantFaketheFunk said:And now, to poke fun at the ambiguities of the English language: Notice that "best f**king / experience" and "best / f**king experience" are two completely different things. I wonder what else IW has in store for Modern Warfare 2, eh?