This kind of thing just makes me despise all forms of marketing more and more. Bill Hicks had some extremely good advice for marketers.
EDIT: Damn, ninja'd by Fronzel.
EDIT: Damn, ninja'd by Fronzel.
Thanks.Scrumpmonkey said:Im not sure, but i think that might be the cleverest thing i have heard all week.LadyRhian said:NUAds reminds me of the word "Gonads". Probably because it's balls.
Very true. There are a number of products/brands (as well as films, games and the like) that I was interested in pre-ad campaign but have since blacklisted due to the intrusiveness and frequency of said ad campaigns.teqrevisited said:I don't know about anyone else, but adverts tend to make me want to buy the product less.
It's already happened. When you put a DVD in, you have to sit through previews and FBI warnings about copyright BS, even though you already paid for the damn thing like a good little consumer. It's making me sick, and I don't think I've actually watched a DVD in over a year now.Sabrestar said:I fear this is way too close to happening.FreakSheet said:Soon, we will have to tweet an ad if we want to watch/play what we have already paid for.
This has pretty much been my own experience as well. And it's not just positive association either for me...it has to be topical. Meaning, if I'm playing videogames on the article's Kinect, then one would logically surmise that any ads that would come through it would promote videogame-related technology or products and nothing else. As the quoted person here, I too have deeply fallen out with TV commercials, because they are completely random and have ramped up to showing up every 30 minutes in our country (which is insane, when our neighbouring country has a big 15 min marketing session at the beginning of a show and then does the sane thing - shows the thing entirely without commercial brakes).Wicky_42 said:Any way it works, unless advertisers realise that brand recognition alone isn't enough and that a POSITIVE association helps, and even then might not work, advertising's just going to be a blight on whatever platform it's plastered across. "Go Compare" with it's annoying opera man is firmly emblazoned into my mind from over-hearing the prat on house-mates' TV, and I know bloody well to keep the fuck away from it. Same for "We Buy Any Car", for similar reasons. Even Old Spice, with one of the more amusing marketing campaigns, merely entertains - I have no desire to purchase the product. Having things rammed down my throat whilst I try to enjoy doing something completely unrelated is NOT a good way of engaging with me, and making me literally go through a song and dance routine does not sound like a positive move on behalf of advertisers, behavioural marketing be damned.
Probably not the one that existed in the same time period as you watched it. As I've said, its advertising ebbed and shifted over the years. But I specifically remember thinking to myself sometime at the end of the 90s "You know...if only more advertising was done this way, it'd be nice."John Burton said:What cartoon network were u watching?
am sure i remember 'loans for you' type ads on thier which were utterly pointless for a child
Well, on the bright side, there's a thing going through were you may be able to sue a company for calling you with the telemarketing thing without having written permission first. I'll take the ads over being woke up at 3am by a machine wanting me to buy floormats. >_>Dorkmaster Flek said:It's already happened. When you put a DVD in, you have to sit through previews and FBI warnings about copyright BS, even though you already paid for the damn thing like a good little consumer. It's making me sick, and I don't think I've actually watched a DVD in over a year now.Sabrestar said:I fear this is way too close to happening.FreakSheet said:Soon, we will have to tweet an ad if we want to watch/play what we have already paid for.