To all that oppose the used game industry(Namely this assclown in particular),
You complain that you're not getting a cut of the profit from used game sales. Before I go on a tirade of how rediculous that is, I will say that from a very thin moral standpoint, you MAY be right. However, the absurdity of your claim is profound, and let me tell you why.
You are in the video game development industry. You built a business around making and selling, not buying and selling. This idea that you should get a cut from someone elses industry is both morally and legally moronic. TO get away from the used games industry, let's look at pawn shops. A pawn shop buys and sells everything, including games, but also guns, jewelry, and other items. If a pawn shop buys and sells a gun, does Ruger deserve to get a cut of the resold pistol? If a pawn shop buys and sells a wristwatch, does Rolex deserve to get part of the money that the pawn shop has invested and turned a profit on?
The answer to this is no. Ruger and Rolex, like every other manufacturer, have a very simple relationship with their customers. They make and sell, and the customer buys. They have no right nor grounds to demand or even suggest that they recieve money from the actions of another company simply because they have a name on the product, and the used games industry is no different. If you want to turn a profit on your own used games, then expand your business model to include buying and selling used games as well as manufacturing and development.
Until that day though, keep your hands off and your mouth shut.
Sincerely, ShadowKatt.