shintakie10 said:
Hate crime wouldn't apply unless you somehow tied furries under sexual orientation. I mean, I can see HOW you could do it, but whether anyone would actually give enough fucks about furries to do so is entirely another matter.
Unless I'm trying them in court or saying they should be tried in court, a hate crime applies, as it applies to people being targeted for their membership of a social group. Since I'm not a lawyer and have been warned in the past against trying people on the streets, I think I'm on safe ground. Keep in mind that the term "hate crime" was used to describe attacks on homosexuals before sexual orientation was added to the list of legally recognised groups and it's still used to describe attacks on trans individuals despite the lack of legal recognition in the states of gender identity as a protected group. Also, this varies on a state level, so I don't know what applies in any given state.
Simply put, they appear to have been targeted for who/what they are. I don't care if you consider furries a sexuality, gender identity, race, religion, or disability, the term as is used applies. Terrorism usually comes down to the intent of terror for some end. This may or may not apply, but it seems less likely. It seems like someone just wanted to kill some furries.
MPerce said:
Daaaaaaaamn, someone went to A LOT of effort to hurt some people who are into stuff he/she doesn't like.
It's kind of a shock to think that they went from "fire alarms pulled" to "chemical attack." From dick move to attempted murder. It's like something you'd see in a TV show where you have that one guy (I call him Farva) who doesn't just go too far, he goes waaaaay too far. Except it's real.