S.R.S. said:
At first no. I hit myself with a real sword enough times to know when to put it down. With a Lightsaber on the other hand..
Technically, according to the cannon, a lightsaber would be way worse at that, since the blade is weightless, and therefore does not act as a counter weight to the hilt, making the whole thing terribly unbalanced.
To help that, the blade also would probably give you little to no physical feedback against most materials (particularly human flesh)... so you'd probably cut through yourself before your hand noticed you hit anything.
That said, ironically, most, if not all, of our current weapons would easily kill a "cannon" Jedi. Jedis are good at deflecting the slow-moving energy projectiles that compose most of their universe's weapons, but a bullet moves at a much higher speed. Not to mention refire rate. Something like a P90 would shred a Jedi before they even lined up their blade.
mrhappyface said:
I think if I was in the Star Wars universe, I would personally use a rocket launcher or some other kind of heavy weapon since in a combat situation, I would probably have the range advantage.
Not a good weapon choice. Rocket launchers are heavy and cumbersome, you really would want to give up as little mobility as possible as range would be your main advantage.
Adding to that rockets aren't the most effective things against jedis... They're slower than energy projectiles, making them easier to avoid, and the rockets can be pushed away with force.
@Thread: Best option in the star wars universe would generally be blasters. The problem with blasters and jedis is that most of the time in the Star Wars universe the people wielding the blasters are complete bumbling idiots who either couldn't hit the side of a moon or seem to be aiming exactly at the same spot everytime and shooting as slowly as they can, while pacing horribly slowly towards their own death.
Most real guns would easily kill a Jedi.