Thank god! I thought I was the only one who noticed.LetalisK said:Archery isn't in. People who don't know how to hold a fucking bow are in. Specifically the hunger games chick. That is mind-fuckingly bad.
Thank god! I thought I was the only one who noticed.LetalisK said:Archery isn't in. People who don't know how to hold a fucking bow are in. Specifically the hunger games chick. That is mind-fuckingly bad.
I think it's a coincidence, albiet a very consistent one. All of these movies have been several years in the making, and not all of them took the same amount of time. But, they managed to all come out in the same year, making it the year of the bow.CODE-D said:-snip-
Not to mention that they are considered less violent than guns. Probably because getting shot with an arrow is far less likely in real life than being shot with a gun. It's more removed from reality and more exotic. And you can depict the hero pinning the villain down with arrows or something without hurting them.mindlesspuppet said:^ ThisHeronblade said:Archery has been a part of our media for quite a while, and with good reason. There's nothing particularly new about this trend.
Hawkeye and Green Arrow have been around for decades. Hawkeye is a staple of the Avengers, so that was bound to happen.
Of course anything in a fantasy setting is going to have archery, they can't exactly use AK47s, and it's the only practical ranged physical attacks.
A ton of games have bow & arrows or crossbows, been like this for as long as I can remember, Thief comes to mind.
That all aside, bows have been around in human history since nearly the beginning of civilization. They haven't exactly faded away like the trebuchet [for example] has, they are still commonly used for sport and hunting. By all means they should be prevalent in media.
Might have to disagree on the less violent part. Sure we've all seen scenes in movies in games when a person gets riddled with bullets, but it seems so much more poignant and violent when a person gets taken down with arrows but struggles to keep going despite the shafts stick out their body. Not to mention there's a sort of brutality in yanking an arrow out of a victim's flesh to use again that guns simply can't match -- gathering my fired arrows in games gives me some sort of visceral pleasure that's hard to put into words.Lieju said:snip...
Not to mention that they are considered less violent than guns. Probably because getting shot with an arrow is far less likely in real life than being shot with a gun. It's more removed from reality and more exotic. And you can depict the hero pinning the villain down with arrows or something without hurting them.
That's the reason super-heroes like Green Arrow and Hawkeye are considered to be more acceptable than if they shot people with a gun.
And I haven't seen Hunger games, but I suspect that's the reason she uses a bow.
They can be violent, but if you depict anything with a lot of blood and guts, you can make it more violent. I guess 'violent', is a wrong word.mindlesspuppet said:Might have to disagree on the less violent part. Sure we've all seen scenes in movies in games when a person gets riddled with bullets, but it seems so much more poignant and violent when a person gets taken down with arrows but struggles to keep going despite the shafts stick out their body. Not to mention there's a sort of brutality in yanking an arrow out of a victim's flesh to use again that guns simply can't match -- gathering my fired arrows in games gives me some sort of visceral pleasure that's hard to put into words.Lieju said:snip...
Not to mention that they are considered less violent than guns. Probably because getting shot with an arrow is far less likely in real life than being shot with a gun. It's more removed from reality and more exotic. And you can depict the hero pinning the villain down with arrows or something without hurting them.
That's the reason super-heroes like Green Arrow and Hawkeye are considered to be more acceptable than if they shot people with a gun.
And I haven't seen Hunger games, but I suspect that's the reason she uses a bow.
You do definitely have a point about them being more removed from reality, at least as far as violence is concern. You don't tend to hear about drive bys or school shootings with crossbows. For that reason I think they are more acceptable than guns.
You have a terrible teacher probably.Credossuck said:I was into Bowing once.....
then i hit my dog.....
dog got a case of dead....
oooohhhh fuck.... no stunt dog...
Never done it since then.
Oh but i still do archery. Have been for 10 years now. Still can't hit shit.