Is Hitting A Girl All That Bad?
- Thread starter DarthScorpio11
- Start date
Recommended Videos
1. I think hitting a girl in the same instances I'd hit a guy is perfectly acceptable. Those situations include great bodily harm or things that can potentially leave scars, like a punch to the nose(can WRECK your face).
2. I don't understand the where words cross into the physical realm, unless you attack me or my valuables(I will defend things like my laptop that I can't afford to replace), I'm not gonna touch you, the risk of me getting in trouble is too great. I don't care what you say, if you are the kind that says nasty evil shit, you will only have the chance once, I'll be gone before the next chance arises. I don't see how anyone gets talked into punching someone, learn to fucking control yourself, or at least pick better people to be around.
3. Touching =/= hitting. If I was assaulted in a fashion that prevented escape and threatened great harm, I'd jab a mofo in the throat. But up until that point, armlocks and pushing are fully suitable. I can lift a person 300 pounds, I can take him off his feet and lay him out mostly unharmed, unless I positively have to waste him(really REALLY unlikely) I won't be punching or kicking anyone.
4. Bill Burr puts a funny spin on it, although I have seen real cases of what he is talking about.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5W4J6pGkUBo
2. I don't understand the where words cross into the physical realm, unless you attack me or my valuables(I will defend things like my laptop that I can't afford to replace), I'm not gonna touch you, the risk of me getting in trouble is too great. I don't care what you say, if you are the kind that says nasty evil shit, you will only have the chance once, I'll be gone before the next chance arises. I don't see how anyone gets talked into punching someone, learn to fucking control yourself, or at least pick better people to be around.
3. Touching =/= hitting. If I was assaulted in a fashion that prevented escape and threatened great harm, I'd jab a mofo in the throat. But up until that point, armlocks and pushing are fully suitable. I can lift a person 300 pounds, I can take him off his feet and lay him out mostly unharmed, unless I positively have to waste him(really REALLY unlikely) I won't be punching or kicking anyone.
4. Bill Burr puts a funny spin on it, although I have seen real cases of what he is talking about.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5W4J6pGkUBo
Might of been said, but:
If you are a man, the majority of of women are much, much weaker than you. Despite what a lot of feminists may want you to believe, women are smaller, weaker, and more fragile than men (I am a woman myself, I KNOW THIS) for the most part, and thus a dude hitting a woman is kind of like kicking a kitten.
There are exceptions, of course.
But, if anyone has attacked you first, then woman or not they deserve to get punched.
If you are a man, the majority of of women are much, much weaker than you. Despite what a lot of feminists may want you to believe, women are smaller, weaker, and more fragile than men (I am a woman myself, I KNOW THIS) for the most part, and thus a dude hitting a woman is kind of like kicking a kitten.
There are exceptions, of course.
But, if anyone has attacked you first, then woman or not they deserve to get punched.
I'm a girl.
Hitting me completely unprovoked is a bit bad, unless we're in the bedroom, that can be foreplay.
If I hit you and you don't hit me back, I'm a bit miffed, honestly.
Otherwise, use your best judgment.
Sexism, blah blah, all been said before...
Hitting me completely unprovoked is a bit bad, unless we're in the bedroom, that can be foreplay.
If I hit you and you don't hit me back, I'm a bit miffed, honestly.
Otherwise, use your best judgment.
Sexism, blah blah, all been said before...
its not about girls and boys.
you arent supposed to hit anybody. in your example its about two siblings witch will always tease and fight with each other and that is completely normal wether you are girls or boys. but the idea of violence is something so wrong in its nature.
you are violating the right of another human being the same thing goes when you are mocking somebody ore in anyway making them feel less valuable.
violence is the last resort of a conflict and its in our nature to resort to it in different situations. since it is in our nature we often feel a rush or some euphoria when we do it, not everybody and not all the time, but people like to be in control and seeing yourself triumph with violence is a very basic way of getting that.
now the physical violation that you make the other person go through, especially if you are stronger, can never be justified.
you are dominating him or her with violence and therefore depraving him of his given right to freedom from tyranny.
it may sound a bit over the top but its actually not that farfetched. violence is never okay wether its between boys, girls ore anything in between.
you arent supposed to hit anybody. in your example its about two siblings witch will always tease and fight with each other and that is completely normal wether you are girls or boys. but the idea of violence is something so wrong in its nature.
you are violating the right of another human being the same thing goes when you are mocking somebody ore in anyway making them feel less valuable.
violence is the last resort of a conflict and its in our nature to resort to it in different situations. since it is in our nature we often feel a rush or some euphoria when we do it, not everybody and not all the time, but people like to be in control and seeing yourself triumph with violence is a very basic way of getting that.
now the physical violation that you make the other person go through, especially if you are stronger, can never be justified.
you are dominating him or her with violence and therefore depraving him of his given right to freedom from tyranny.
it may sound a bit over the top but its actually not that farfetched. violence is never okay wether its between boys, girls ore anything in between.
Everything about the modern world and all it's so-called 'equality', including the incredibly annoying radical feminists, makes me want to say "Yeah, if you're pushed to the brink, go for it". That said, if it ever came to it, I just KNOW that I personally wouldn't hit a girl.
Food for thought though blokes (and ladies too if you feel the irrepressible desire to contribute), and that is, for all of you who believe it's acceptable to hit a girl, what is the tipping point? Is it under the same circumstance that you would hit a man? Like if she threw a drink in your face, or spat on you? Where's the line, or, to put it another way, what's the least that you'd hit a girl for? Hurling incessant verbal abuse, or an actual physical act?
Discuss.
Food for thought though blokes (and ladies too if you feel the irrepressible desire to contribute), and that is, for all of you who believe it's acceptable to hit a girl, what is the tipping point? Is it under the same circumstance that you would hit a man? Like if she threw a drink in your face, or spat on you? Where's the line, or, to put it another way, what's the least that you'd hit a girl for? Hurling incessant verbal abuse, or an actual physical act?
Discuss.
Hitting a girl = bad
Hitting a guy = bad
Hitting anyone back = perfectly legit
My friends know I'm fine with hitting girls back. Some looked pretty surprised the first time they witnessed it, but I just tell them that every action has an equal and opposite reaction. I return the strike with the same force and target I received it in, until it breaks out into a full-on fight. Then I fight til my enemy is unwilling or unable to fight back, but thankfully it's never gone that far with a girl.
Hitting a guy = bad
Hitting anyone back = perfectly legit
My friends know I'm fine with hitting girls back. Some looked pretty surprised the first time they witnessed it, but I just tell them that every action has an equal and opposite reaction. I return the strike with the same force and target I received it in, until it breaks out into a full-on fight. Then I fight til my enemy is unwilling or unable to fight back, but thankfully it's never gone that far with a girl.
Sexist morals if anything. To be fair, niether should hit either, but because of the way today is, people think if a man strikes a woman under ANY circumstances, its wrong and he should be punished, even in self defence.
The worst part is women use this to theri advantage sometime so they'll hit a man, abuse etc and when that man finally snaps, it's instantly "Oh I was struck by a man, you heartless bastard!".
Like women kicking men in the balls. they think it's funny but after a while you've just permanently damaged a mans reproductive organ and in some cases, caused them to become sterile. There's been a few court cases when a teenager girl(s) have kicked a kid so badly in the sack he became fertile at only 15, basically destroying all chances of him having a kid from his own DNA.
Obviously if a woman strikes me im not going to openly let them hit me, I'll put their arm into a lock or something to not hit but stop them. Weapons though, they come at me with a knife... Guess who's about to have THEIR crotch kicked...
The worst part is women use this to theri advantage sometime so they'll hit a man, abuse etc and when that man finally snaps, it's instantly "Oh I was struck by a man, you heartless bastard!".
Like women kicking men in the balls. they think it's funny but after a while you've just permanently damaged a mans reproductive organ and in some cases, caused them to become sterile. There's been a few court cases when a teenager girl(s) have kicked a kid so badly in the sack he became fertile at only 15, basically destroying all chances of him having a kid from his own DNA.
Obviously if a woman strikes me im not going to openly let them hit me, I'll put their arm into a lock or something to not hit but stop them. Weapons though, they come at me with a knife... Guess who's about to have THEIR crotch kicked...
I try to not hit anyone under most circumstances.
Sharpened knives, however....
In all seriousness, I'd sooner hit 50 men than 1 lady. If that's sexist, then so be it, but I don't feel comfortable when doing so. Male brains are generally conditioned to want to want to please ladies, for obvious reasons. Of course, there are exceptions but they all end up with the same agenda.
Sharpened knives, however....
In all seriousness, I'd sooner hit 50 men than 1 lady. If that's sexist, then so be it, but I don't feel comfortable when doing so. Male brains are generally conditioned to want to want to please ladies, for obvious reasons. Of course, there are exceptions but they all end up with the same agenda.
Generally I think violence should not be an option, but that can only be put so far. Everyone (read: EVERYONE) has a right to self defence, so basically if someone attacks you from nowhere they cannot use any excuses; the fact is that they assaulted you and put you in danger. It all varies on context, but if it is in retaliation to get yourself to relative safety then it is okay regardless of sex, race, age or anything else. Just don't try to turn the tables the other way.
The whole "Violence Against Women" movement is one of the most sexist I have seen. Battered males are often framed, stigmatised, overlooked and disdained - all because they cannot "rightfully" defend themselves against their attacker. Abusive women should not ever use that well-meaning yet wholly flawed movement to their advantage, that is further emotional and mental abuse. Studies have shown that in some circumstances these women were much smaller than the man, yet they can still inflict a lot of damage. Plus the ratio of male:female victims is not very different.
Put it this way, if you do constantly attack people without being provoked you are scum. Scum has no sex. However, in most situations it ideal to boycott violence but that cannot always be fallen back on.
The whole "Violence Against Women" movement is one of the most sexist I have seen. Battered males are often framed, stigmatised, overlooked and disdained - all because they cannot "rightfully" defend themselves against their attacker. Abusive women should not ever use that well-meaning yet wholly flawed movement to their advantage, that is further emotional and mental abuse. Studies have shown that in some circumstances these women were much smaller than the man, yet they can still inflict a lot of damage. Plus the ratio of male:female victims is not very different.
Put it this way, if you do constantly attack people without being provoked you are scum. Scum has no sex. However, in most situations it ideal to boycott violence but that cannot always be fallen back on.
More than 40% of domestic violence victims are male [http://www.guardian.co.uk/society/2010/sep/05/men-victims-domestic-violence]
Men tend to know how to roll with a punch from their childhood. A lot of women never get that, luckily. That just means men tend to receive more punches before they fall. A simple backhand will fell most women, but they know to stay down. Men need to be beaten into the ground, often repeatedly.
There's a lot worse you can do to a woman than punch her though. And a lot worse you can do to a man.
Emotionless tone here is deliberate. I've seen cases of both and both are sickening.
Men tend to know how to roll with a punch from their childhood. A lot of women never get that, luckily. That just means men tend to receive more punches before they fall. A simple backhand will fell most women, but they know to stay down. Men need to be beaten into the ground, often repeatedly.
There's a lot worse you can do to a woman than punch her though. And a lot worse you can do to a man.
Emotionless tone here is deliberate. I've seen cases of both and both are sickening.
If a Girl is lashing out at a bloke for no reason what so ever and properly laying in to the poor sod, he has every right to fight back.
If I started on a bloke for shits and giggles, I would expect to he punched back, not for them to think, "Oh, She's a Girl, it's OK!".
I hate the way some Women actually think they can get away with, and it's like some right, to lay in to Men when they're being a bit dickish, because they know the Man "isn't allowed to hit them back".
Physical abuse just for the fun of it, or because you're a controlling asshole is wrong from both sides.
If I started on a bloke for shits and giggles, I would expect to he punched back, not for them to think, "Oh, She's a Girl, it's OK!".
I hate the way some Women actually think they can get away with, and it's like some right, to lay in to Men when they're being a bit dickish, because they know the Man "isn't allowed to hit them back".
Physical abuse just for the fun of it, or because you're a controlling asshole is wrong from both sides.
