I believe that most artists/wordsmiths/poets/etc. feel they are extremely negative toward their own works when its mostly hyper-critical because no matter what the end result doesn't always match up with the vision in their head. I am a writer, pencil artist and amateur painter, and I get told all the damn time how good I am at these things. Doesn't matter because its never good enough for me. I believe thats why professionals hire people to be their critics instead of doing it themselves. If they didn't they would never put any work out. Hence why we have editors, promoters, managers, etc.
Being negative and being critical may seem like the same thing but it is not. You most likely take your work seriously, at least thats what I do, and it comes out sounding negative.
We artists of any format have to allow for outside opinions to influence our "view" a bit. Also accepting that perfection is unattainable is paramount if not easy. Basically we have to eventually hand off our creations to others at some point and accept that it may not be as good as we wanted but if others like it we did well enough.
Easier said than done, I know.
Being negative and being critical may seem like the same thing but it is not. You most likely take your work seriously, at least thats what I do, and it comes out sounding negative.
We artists of any format have to allow for outside opinions to influence our "view" a bit. Also accepting that perfection is unattainable is paramount if not easy. Basically we have to eventually hand off our creations to others at some point and accept that it may not be as good as we wanted but if others like it we did well enough.
Easier said than done, I know.