And I was simply informing you that you are, in fact, wrong. If you don't want to believe me, so be it. I really don't mind.Pirate Kitty said:I was simply informing you that you do not understand that law. If you don't want to believe me, so be it. I really don't mind.Orekoya said:It is oddly worded but it completely covers the right of acquiring "adaptation of that computer program" if it is an "essential step in the utilization of the computer program" that can be "used in no other manner".Pirate Kitty said:You misunderstand that law, my friend.Orekoya said:17 U.S.C. § 117 Limitations on exclusive rights: Computer programsPirate Kitty said:Right, meaning legal?
No.
(a) Making of Additional Copy or Adaptation by Owner of Copy. ? Notwithstanding the provisions of section 106, it is not an infringement for the owner of a copy of a computer program to make or authorize the making of another copy or adaptation of that computer program provided:
(1) that such a new copy or adaptation is created as an essential step in the utilization of the computer program in conjunction with a machine and that it is used in no other manner, or
(2) that such new copy or adaptation is for archival purposes only and that all archival copies are destroyed in the event that continued possession of the computer program should cease to be rightful.
Right, meaning legal?
Yes.
If you own a copy of data and the original source of data is damaged beyond use, it's legal to have another copy of that exact data even if you did not make the back up yourself, provided of course it didn't have in-placed some form of time limit that "continued possession of the computer program should cease to be rightful" such as the pay-to-play variety.
I also noticed that you have skirted posting anything with substance. If you are going to tell someone they are wrong, you do need to elaborate on why; otherwise it can be seen as childish.
Except piracy isnt illegal where i live (its not somalia btw)Sober Thal said:If you are amazed at my last post, I fear what any further replies may warrant.insaneHoshi said:Im amazed at the depth of your argument, how isnt it ok, morally or legaly? And how can you pirate something you allready own?Sober Thal said:No. It isn't okay to pirate.
That is all.
Have a nice day, and don't break any laws.
legally, you can pirate a file you already own because what you have paid for is the licence to use the software in question. from what source you get the software doesn't matter.Pirate Kitty said:Right, meaning legal?
No.
Better edit that before a mod slaps you with a probation.HappyHacker said: