Link was invented in 1986. Leaving him as he is would date him as a relic. But making him a character now would be a betrayal of the series' core roots and open the door for ludicrous possibilities.
From an aesthetic/art design sense, I'd be way more jazzed about a gender-swapped Ganondorf than a gender-swapped Link or Zelda. Being as androgynous as Link already is depicted, there's comparatively little room for artistic creativity in that gender swap, and I doubt more than a handful of designers would do a gender-swapped Zelda justice. Gender-swapping Ganon, on the other hand, has all kinds of cool possibilities for redesign.Smilomaniac said:As far as I understand the lore, however, both he and Zelda are physical manifestations of two heroic spirits, so it supports a female Link or Linkle. Zelda might as well be a prince or king as well and the evil spirit that Ganon represents might as well be female.
From the Hyrule Historia: "The heroes of these chronicles all share the name Link. These Links might have been the same person, a series of familial descendants, or a number of heroes with different names entirely. The Links of certain eras may also have been named after the legendary hero." I think that contradicts your view on the series.CaptainMarvelous said:I think there's a problem here with how everyone is seeing the reincarnation thing. It's not like Avatar where its one spirit in different bodies, it's the same person. They might look different due to the graphics and act different due to the current state of Hyrule but they intrinsically ARE the same person.
I don't believe it does; though it does also offer an alternative.SmallHatLogan said:From the Hyrule Historia: "The heroes of these chronicles all share the name Link. These Links might have been the same person, a series of familial descendants, or a number of heroes with different names entirely. The Links of certain eras may also have been named after the legendary hero." I think that contradicts your view on the series.CaptainMarvelous said:I think there's a problem here with how everyone is seeing the reincarnation thing. It's not like Avatar where its one spirit in different bodies, it's the same person. They might look different due to the graphics and act different due to the current state of Hyrule but they intrinsically ARE the same person.
All the Links are certainly not the same person. There's at least 8 individuals who are different 'Links' in a chain of heroism that goes back through the ages.CaptainMarvelous said:I don't believe it does; though it does also offer an alternative.SmallHatLogan said:From the Hyrule Historia: "The heroes of these chronicles all share the name Link. These Links might have been the same person, a series of familial descendants, or a number of heroes with different names entirely. The Links of certain eras may also have been named after the legendary hero." I think that contradicts your view on the series.CaptainMarvelous said:I think there's a problem here with how everyone is seeing the reincarnation thing. It's not like Avatar where its one spirit in different bodies, it's the same person. They might look different due to the graphics and act different due to the current state of Hyrule but they intrinsically ARE the same person.
If Peach can get her own game, why not Zelda, 'eyRedryhno said:Ah, but that's the kicker isn't it? The gameplay may indeed be from Link's perspective, but how often is it Zelda that drives the plot forward? How often is it that Link is following Zelda's instructions or wishes? We're playing Link, sure, but most games it's very much centered around Zelda. Link's just the guy that does the dungeon crawling, Zelda's the one that knows what's actually going on and most times Link would never win against Ganon without her help and/or intervention.Nazulu said:However, at the same exact time Again, I feel like Zelda should be the one changing positions. It's the legend of "Zelda" after all. Give her the spot light for once so the name makes sense.
Way I've always seen it is that we're playing through Link's eyes, but it's most definitely Zelda's story the majority of the time.
Edit: clicked post instead of preview for formatting errors...
I do agree with you that I'd like to have a Zelda game with Zelda as the player's avatar though. She's a badass in all of her incarnations in some way, and I'd love to see some things unfold with her at the center of it instead of how we largely see it from Link's perspective.
I have to take issue with that, Twilight Princess Link shows emotion and sneaks a cheeky look at Telma's cleavage (which we may choose to take as short-hand expression of his sex and age).Casual Shinji said:Depends on the game he's in.
In Wind Waker he's definately a character. He gets happy, sad, tense. He also gets super hyped when he's beaten a Boss. If he didn't have any character I'd doubt he'd be as likeable as he is that game.
In Twilight Princess he's blank hero man with a perpetual expression of determination on his face.
That's highly questionable. His appearance changes quite a bit, even without invoking technical limitations.CaptainMarvelous said:I think there's a problem here with how everyone is seeing the reincarnation thing. It's not like Avatar where its one spirit in different bodies, it's the same person. They might look different due to the graphics and act different due to the current state of Hyrule but they intrinsically ARE the same person.
In that regard, the Lore very much DOESN'T support a Female Link. Just not how the reincarnation works.
Personally? Don't really care either way. As far as I'm concerned Female Link is just Samus. Mute, Blonde, Badass.
Think I mis-spoke; I don't mean the literal same person as in Link loses and gains years as appropriate; I mean that each re-incarnation is "Link", not just the same name but the same person re-incarnated in near enough the same form. Effectively mystic cloning depending on what Hyrule needs at the time.AccursedTheory said:All the Links are certainly not the same person. There's at least 8 individuals who are different 'Links' in a chain of heroism that goes back through the ages.CaptainMarvelous said:I don't believe it does; though it does also offer an alternative.SmallHatLogan said:From the Hyrule Historia: "The heroes of these chronicles all share the name Link. These Links might have been the same person, a series of familial descendants, or a number of heroes with different names entirely. The Links of certain eras may also have been named after the legendary hero." I think that contradicts your view on the series.CaptainMarvelous said:I think there's a problem here with how everyone is seeing the reincarnation thing. It's not like Avatar where its one spirit in different bodies, it's the same person. They might look different due to the graphics and act different due to the current state of Hyrule but they intrinsically ARE the same person.
As I recall (In order of release, not in universe)...
Link '1' - Zelda (NES), Zelda II (NES)
Link '2' - A Link to the Past (NES), Link's Awakening (GB)
Link '3' - Ocarina of Time (N64), Majora's Mask (N64)
Link '4' - Wind Waker (GC), Phantom Hour Glass (DS)
Link '5' - Twilight Princess (Wii)
Link '6' - Skyward Sword (Wii)
Link '7' - Spirit Tracks (DS)
Link '8' - A Link Between Worlds (3DS)
Link '?' - Oracle of Ages (GBC), Oracle of Seasons (GBC), Minish Cap (GBA)
This is from the people who made the game, mind you. Not only are all the Links separated by defined generations, but there's also at least two alternate dimensions where the games take place, the dimension split happening after Ocarina of Time, leading into Majora's mask->Twilight Princess and Wind Waker->Phantom Hour Glass.
Zelda's 'canon' is bizarre, poorly defined, and obviously set up as to allow the developers to do whatever the hell they want, so it's best ignored most of the time. But it is there.
This is the problem though; you're right. If it was just the spirit of the Hero re-incarnating then the appearance would change each time. But it doesn't, Link is near always the same face with blond hair and ears. Changes in art style aside, he looks nearly identical each time around which isn't a reincarnated spirit it's the same dude in a different time period.CrystalShadow said:That's highly questionable. His appearance changes quite a bit, even without invoking technical limitations.CaptainMarvelous said:I think there's a problem here with how everyone is seeing the reincarnation thing. It's not like Avatar where its one spirit in different bodies, it's the same person. They might look different due to the graphics and act different due to the current state of Hyrule but they intrinsically ARE the same person.
In that regard, the Lore very much DOESN'T support a Female Link. Just not how the reincarnation works.
Personally? Don't really care either way. As far as I'm concerned Female Link is just Samus. Mute, Blonde, Badass.
(For one thing, it has also changed in the complementary artwork of various games)
And while timeline theories for the games are always pretty fuzzy, there are a few known facts about various incarnations.
The link in Zelda 1 and 2 are the same person.
The link in 'A link to the past' is also the same person as the one in 'Link's awakening'.
Similarly, Majora's mask is a continuation of at least one of the Ocarina of time timelines.
Meanwhile, Wind Waker almost references OOT, and implies some things about the nature of the new Link.
And reincarnation doesn't imply you are the same person each time by any sense of your physical nature.
In fact, most notions of reincarnation imply quite the opposite.
While it is the same spirit in each case, the body can vary dramatically. Male, female, different physical appearance, different race, even different species, this is considered to be the case most of the time when it comes to reincarnation as a concept.
Bringing someone back exactly as they were is not usually considered reincarnation.
On that note, the plot in most Zelda games implies the following about the characters:
Link is a reincarnation of the spirit of the original hero.
Zelda seems to have a hereditary link to older incarnations of herself as well.
Ganon is more often than not represented as explicitly the same person.
Not the same spirit, not a reincarnation, but literally the exact same person.
We see in OOT (Ocarina of Time) there is no ending in which he dies. Rather, he is cast into the void.
A link to the past references a prior event (which, incidentally, allowing for the vagueness of legends passed on over many centuries, resembles the plot of OOT), and Ganon in that game has been sealed away in the Golden realm/Dark world since whatever time the opening sequence is referencing.
(Though it references OOT logically, clearly due to the order in which the games were made, it is OOT which references a Link to the past's backstory. But the consequence is about the same either way.)
In wind waker, he again escapes from somewhere where he had been imprisoned for quite some time (again, apparently referencing the OOT ending)
In Twilight princess Again, we see Ganon has been imprisoned/disabled for quite some time, and there is reference to a prior event in which he was defeated, but not killed.
Anyway, nothing about reincarnation as a concept, nor link's case in particular implies anything about the form a reincarnated spirit should take.
That's not how reincarnation works, by and large.
That he doesn't remember anything from prior incarnations would also tend to support this.
If we take Skyward Sword as canon this is either a "past life" teaching you things you know deal or its not one of the Links. Cos like you say, shit dont add up.not to mention that Twilight princess presents the rather interesting situation where the undead character that teaches the Link of that game several sword techniques - the hero's shade - would seem to be a prior incarnation of Link, based on the available evidence.
Of course, this creates a bunch of logistical problems for any theory that explicitly connects all the links together as being 'the same person' in any shape or form.
Because, while an undead link might not be alive, you would think he still has his spirit, since that's kind of implied by being undead without having turned into a mindless zombie.
And if that's the case, how can the Hero's shade still have Link's spirit, while teaching a new Link how to fight?
It would mean they share the same spirit, at the same time...
All I'm saying is the "Link could be a girl cos reincarnation" theory doesn't hold up because every time he re-incarnates Link looks near exactly the same. Linkle not withstanding, idk what her deal is.Ragardless, Legend of Zelda mythology is so ambiguous that you can't draw definitive conclusions about it.
And that in and of itself negates your point, because you are assuming certainty where there is none.
To be fair, Link is more of a...role. It's a mantle someone dons to save the world. Sort of like what happened with Thor apparently, in the new comics with that woman becoming Thor. "Link" works the same way only it's some kind of reincarnation and not a title bestowed after the fact. So it'd make sense for a girl Link to follow the conventions of the Hero of Time. It gives us that feeling of continuation the series is known for, that it's a cyclical universe.AccursedTheory said:But I am a bit disappointed that 'Female Link' is the best they can do. I'd be all in for a Zelda game where your a new female character instead of Link, or, you know... we could make a game where the controllable character is also the character in the title.
But no, lets just slap some pony tails on and call it a day. Fuck it.
Why is it so bad to be a player avatar? I don't really consider this a negative. I think Zelda tends to be more about theme then plot or character. OOT is about growing up. Majora's Mask is about death and grief. These are still interesting works of art with a lot of thought put into them. They just don't have a complex protagonist. It's more about how the player chooses to interact with the world. I think that's a unique form of art that only games are capable of. Some would say it's one of the purest forms of art.Hades said:Nintendo once said that the player was meant to project himself in Link but if that was the idea then that idea has changed.
Think back though, outside of the originals, she's often getting shit done. Twilight Princess is the most recent where she seemingly does nothing, but even then there's a huge amount of backstory of her gathering the Hylians for a war with the Twili, and being pushed back and being forced to give up otherwise everyone dies. And she stayed there in Hyrule Castle, just imagine the mental fortitude she's got to have to be able to just sit there and do nothing and still coming back and saving your ass when Ganon comes back essentially. And hell, even then, without Rusl and the Hyrule Liberation Front, Link would have pretty much no idea of what he's doing.Nazulu said:If Peach can get her own game, why not Zelda, 'eyRedryhno said:Ah, but that's the kicker isn't it? The gameplay may indeed be from Link's perspective, but how often is it Zelda that drives the plot forward? How often is it that Link is following Zelda's instructions or wishes? We're playing Link, sure, but most games it's very much centered around Zelda. Link's just the guy that does the dungeon crawling, Zelda's the one that knows what's actually going on and most times Link would never win against Ganon without her help and/or intervention.Nazulu said:However, at the same exact time Again, I feel like Zelda should be the one changing positions. It's the legend of "Zelda" after all. Give her the spot light for once so the name makes sense.
Way I've always seen it is that we're playing through Link's eyes, but it's most definitely Zelda's story the majority of the time.
Edit: clicked post instead of preview for formatting errors...
I do agree with you that I'd like to have a Zelda game with Zelda as the player's avatar though. She's a badass in all of her incarnations in some way, and I'd love to see some things unfold with her at the center of it instead of how we largely see it from Link's perspective.
I disagree with your point though. Zelda may know whats going on but her side of the story is incredibly boring compared to Links. The dungeon crawling and boss challenges are the largest events and what I can only see as the most important objectives for reaching and beating Ganon, as well as saving others on the way.
Thing is, a huge amount of Ganon's backstory is very much dependent on him being a dude. It's why he has the power he starts off with in addition to having the will to hold the Triforce of Power(or is it Strength? I forget). He's a fucking Gerudo MALE. There's only one of those every few generations, and making him a woman takes away exactly how important he is to the tribe.Smilomaniac said:As others have stated, Link can and has been an established character in several iterations of the Zelda games and also in a cartoon and a comic (probably more).
As far as I understand the lore, however, both he and Zelda are physical manifestations of two heroic spirits, so it supports a female Link or Linkle. Zelda might as well be a prince or king as well and the evil spirit that Ganon represents might as well be female.
If I fucked up on the lore, feel free to correct me, it's just what I've sort of understood through the years.
I don't really think you can claim that. Let's remember the old wisdom (represented as a joke)CaptainMarvelous said:every time he re-incarnates Link looks near exactly the same.
What you can say for definite is that every reincarnated Link you've been shown so far is the same. That's more accurate. It also doesn't automatically mean that they are all the same, however.A mathematician, a physicist, and an engineer are on a train going through Scotland. The engineer sees a black sheep, and says, "Aha! The sheep in Scotland are black!" The physicist shakes his head and says, "Ha! You're wrong! One sheep in Scotland is black!" The mathematician shakes his head sadly and says, "You're both wrong. One sheep in Scotland is black on one side..."
Yes, but that's my point in the first place. The statement 'every time he reincarnates he looks exactly the same' is actually false.CaptainMarvelous said:All I'm saying is the "Link could be a girl cos reincarnation" theory doesn't hold up because every time he re-incarnates Link looks near exactly the same. Linkle not withstanding, idk what her deal is.CrystalShadow said:Regardless, Legend of Zelda mythology is so ambiguous that you can't draw definitive conclusions about it.
And that in and of itself negates your point, because you are assuming certainty where there is none.