When the kids arent using the internet for education purposes (facebook, twitter, porn) then its not a case of Big Brother, its a case of use the wifi the the intended purpose or itll have to be policed. Its not that hard of a concept.FalloutJack said:Use of the internet cannot be denied since it's necessary for work purposes. Invasion of your effing laptop cannot be allowed because it's your laptop. Answer: The school has to cave in because they must further education and the completion of work. They are not paid to act as Big Brother. No, they really aren't.Aris Khandr said:And their internet connection. Your point doesn't really hold up.FalloutJack said:No, because this isn't even a case of Sony and the PS3. It's YOUR fucking laptop.
Actually text books are what you use most to do the work you do in school. Using the school's internet or the laptop at all is a choice. The school is allowed by the law (chek the law, it's legal for schools and corporations to watch activity on all computers at the network). They aren't paid to be Big Brother, but there's no law against limitting it it's the right of any network owner to do so in the way they choose.FalloutJack said:Use of the internet cannot be denied since it's necessary for work purposes. Invasion of your effing laptop cannot be allowed because it's your laptop. Answer: The school has to cave in because they must further education and the completion of work. They are not paid to act as Big Brother. No, they really aren't.Aris Khandr said:And their internet connection. Your point doesn't really hold up.FalloutJack said:No, because this isn't even a case of Sony and the PS3. It's YOUR fucking laptop.
Just let it go. For one, you couldn't prove they browsed the information anyway. Secondly, just don't get on Facebook/etc. at school. You know the policy, you're completely aware of it, and now you know that they absolutely have every right to enforce it.Heartcafe said:EDIT: Ok, since many people have said yes, I have a follow up question. If someone is caught on Facebook etc, are they (the school) allowed to browse through the person's profile for information through said person's log in?
well get this the reason most schools don't just block it is because the teachers go on itChibz said:They ARE allowed to, it's just that they SHOULDN'T do it.
Besides, there are less intrusive way to stop facebook/etc use.
OK, that's bloody ridiculous. If you're there to learn & nothing else, they should be there to work.Patrick Young said:well get this the reason most schools don't just block it is because the teachers go on it
Oh... just me and you?.. I thought they had to...Heartcafe said:(Just to let you know, class ended for me back in June but this question has been popping in my head.)
Alright, so for about a year now, our school has implemented a "Big Brother" watch over school computers. More specifically, allowing teachers watch student screens and interact with them via their own desktop. They did this to make sure students aren't accessing Facebook, Twitter, Tumblr etc during school hours which make sense I guess. Of course, eventually some people at school found a loop hole by bring in their own laptops from home instead of using the public laptops at school.
But then the school decided to counter it by forcing students to register their laptops with the school before allowing them access to the internet allowing the school to monitor the activity of anyone accessing the school's internet.
So I'm wondering, are they allow to do that?
Note: I know someone is going to pop the question: well, why don't they use their own mobile phones? Our classes are quite small so hiding isn't easy and our teachers aren't push overs. If anyone is caught with a mobile phone out, they loose it for a week in the teacher's drawers and nobody wants to lose their phone.
EDIT: Ok, since many people have said yes, I have a follow up question. If someone is caught on Facebook etc, are they (the school) allowed to browse through the person's profile for information through said person's log in?
The school is not required to allow students to bring their own hardware, nor is it required to allow students to access the internet with that hardware if it is brought. The school can install whatever monitoring measures it likes on its own hardware--and there are plenty of valid instructional uses for that sort of desktop viewing, anyhow. We also have not been told whether this software is for desktop viewing or desktop control, though neither are wrong on school computers.Uriel-238 said:Note that EULAs are not legally binding in any points are illegal in and of themselves. A school cannot force you to sign away your human rights any more than an employer cannot force you to accept by signature a non-OSHA compliant work environment. Private property within a state or a nation is still subject to the laws of that state and nation.