Seriously? I get ninjad on 'cum-dumpster' of all things. Well done SirNoeL said:I think "cum dumpster" is both more offensive, AND more sexist. "****" doesn't bother me too much though.
Well, these two questions will take seconds to answer:Shanicus said:Couple questions -Mr F. said:Its sexist and the amount it is used does not make it any less sexist. I had to spend over an hour educating a friend of mine as to why the use of the word "Gay" to mean "Anything not good" (See: "That's totally gay" or equivalent) is homophobic. Context is everything, true, and many people who use it, including myself, do not intend to be sexist in the slightest. However, it is still sexist.
One might as well argue that "******" is not homophobic because it is used by so many people in certain communities, or "******" is not racist for the same reason. Context is everything but content still matters. It is not even a question of whether or not you are offending the person you are calling a ****, it is a question of if others are finding your language offensive that are in earshot.
It is why I do not like eating out with my sisters. I swear a lot, although I try and limit this to when it is socially acceptable. I swear more around my sisters, they swear constantly. They have no issue with speaking the same as they do when at home as they do in public and I find it upsetting.
Ah, This argument. It is a word with baggage. Like I said, context matters, but context does not change the content. Intent matters, but intent is not everything. If you totally and utterly accidentally buy stolen goods you can still be arrested for handling them, even if that was not your intent, for ignorance is not an excuse in the eyes of the law.FalloutJack said:No, I would say being abusive and misogynistic is sexist. **** is just a word.Froggy Slayer said:Snip
If I call someone a fucking ****** it does not mater at all if I meant "You very nice person who I love dearly", the term is homophobic REGARDLESS of intent. Same with calling someone a ****. The term is sexist, pure and simple, (As are terms like "Dick" but you know what, that argument is circular and pointless). The question is how much you care and do the people around you care?
For whilst I will not stand for the F word that I have typed multiple times during this post, I can call people cunts. And I do. I accept that it is sexist, I also accept that my close friends are all male and that no harm whatsoever is meant. However, I am still being sexist. Much like when I posted the words "Ding dong the ***** is dead" on FB, that was a sexist remark, it was a gendered insult. It was wrong.
Most of our insults are insulting. That is sorta the point of insults. Denying that the term being discussed is not sexist based on either intent or proliferation is utterly, UTTERLY pointless, for all of the arguments made above.
Unless you intend to indicate that the F word or the N word used above are not racist or homophobic. In which case you are quite simply wrong.
1. If a gay man says ****** or a black guy uses ******, are they still homophobic/racist words? 'Cause it seems that with those words it's more the social context and who is using the word than the actual meaning of the word.
2. Is **** 'sexist' if the group doesn't associate it with it's original meaning? Not like, a small group of friends, but say an entire town/city/country? I say this because outside the capital cities of Australia (at least the more 'official' places of the cities, since they tend to look down on people saying 'damn' let alone the heftier swear words), '****' doesn't have any real meaning. It's a heavier-sounding fuck - no gender association or anything, just a word you use that's meaning depends entirely on the context and inflection you use with it (a high-pitched '****' is a friendly word, a deeper/drawn out **** is hostile/showing anger at something, a 'Cunting X/Fucking ****' is a negative), and has been used as such over multiple generations.
Basically, if the word has been used for 80+ years by a large group of people without gendered association, is it still a 'sexist' word? Granted, finding the word offensive yourself and walking into such a group would probably shock you inside out, but I imagine that's just the end result of two social groups with opposing views interacting.
I pretty much agree with these people. Swear words logic is weird, if it exists at all. XDsomeonehairy-ish said:I've never actually heard a girl get called a ****. Guys, though? All the time. I don't consider it particularly terrible. If I wanted to actually insult a girl by 'reducing her to just her parts' or whatever the stupid determinist logic behind this is, I'd probably just call her a filthy cum-dumpster and be done with it. Obviously I don't ever actually do that, but the option is there.
I'm also British, if anyone hasn't guessed. In certain pubs, finding new and inventive ways to call people cunts is practically a past-time in between rounds of darts.
Seriously? I get ninjad on 'cum-dumpster' of all things. Well done SirNoeL said:I think "cum dumpster" is both more offensive, AND more sexist. "****" doesn't bother me too much though.
Well, I am not exactly a professor of linguistics either, I just bounce things off my sister or my mother (My sister being a feminist, my mother being a linguist) and I build my views from that. Perhaps we all know what it means is a bad way of putting it, we might not all know what it means but that does not change its usage. If, at some point, it is totally and utterly stripped of all meaning and loses ANY meaning as another word for vagina, then yes, it is not a sexist term any more. However, we are talking about the here and now, not the future, not potential. And, right now, it means vagina, and it is used to indicate that something is bad, this usage is inherently sexist. It is exactly the same as using the term gay to mean anything bad, the intent is in most cases not homophobic, however it is as a result of our culture. It is used in that way and it is homophobic in its usage. However, unlike ****, the term "Gay" will not shift away from its current meaning (Homosexual male), and its usage is far less ambiguous.Shanicus said:I see what you're saying there, but... I dunno. I certainly disagree with the whole 'we all know what it means' because quite frankly, we don't all know what it means. Many of my friends and relatives don't know it's 'true' meaning and gendered-association (hell, I didn't know it's meaning until I bothered looking it up a couple years ago), and odds are good their children won't know it either (most of these guys/gals are 3rd gen minimum users of **** as a verb/noun/adjective/Punctuation mark). Couple this with how common and meaningless it is in England/Ireland/Scotland...Mr F. said:Well, these two questions will take seconds to answer:
1. Yes.
2. Yes.
Thats about it. Gay people can use homophobic words, not every word used by a gay person is no longer homophobic. Intent matters but content is very important. Thats about it really. And the word **** does have gendered associations, it might have colloquial meanings and uses but honestly, we all know what it means. We all know it means vagina. The association is still there. It still has its meaning.
This is not a subject I can speak with total authority on. I might just text my sister James, he specializes in this kind of stuff (English needs more gender neutral terms. That was a clunky as fuck way of referring to my sibling who happens to be gender neutral. But they prefer it that way).
The real question is how much you, and the people you are talking to, care. (This is where it is back to context). IF the people around you know you are not being sexist, then you are not being sexist despite the words you are using. But the words themselves still have those meanings. Its a strange thing to bend your mind around.
The jist of what I'm saying is I get your point of the whole 'it's a sexist word but is often used without sexist intent', but I reckon that due to the sheer number of people who use it without sexist intent nor even knowing it's gendered meaning will 'strip the power' of it so-to-say, eventually rendering it as yet another completely meaningless word ala fuck in a few more generations. Granted, could be horribly wrong (not exactly an expert in linguistics and the evolution of words over time), but it's certainly how it's changed meaning around here from what I've seen.
I think George Carlin said it best.UBERfionn said:Words cannot be sexist.
Only people can be sexist.
bah thanks for posting that, i forgot how awesome george carlin is.GonzoGamer said:I think George Carlin said it best.UBERfionn said:Words cannot be sexist.
Only people can be sexist.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6Pksx_IAHDE
As an American I try and only call guys cunts. It's a great percussive word, but where I come from, the women will start hurling punches at you if you direct it towards them.