Is the Hulk Incredible?

Jdopus

New member
Jun 13, 2008
113
0
0
So, earlier in the week I was offered a chance to see the incredible Hulk. I'd heard that it had beaten box office records in America, so I was rather sceptical, however, when I heard the tickets were free I shrugged, thought 'why the hell not' and jumped out the door.

The movie starts with a montage although it's never really explained to us just exactly why he became the Hulk, a few of the characters mention 'gamma poisoning' so I would guess that was how although they don't really go into much detail. Viewers of the first movie might have found it boring that he took so long to become the Hulk, however the director kindly removed all of that so what we're left with is him being the Hulk right from the start and a lack of any back story...ok. On retrospect this might have been a good choice as the chap they've cast to play Bruce Banner has all the Charisma of a rubber hammer and fails to show any emotion throughout the whole film.

So, most of you will get the picture, the Hulk tries to avoid getting angry, gets angry then beats lots of stuff up...hooray. The antagonist in this movie is an army general whos name escapes me at the minute, howeverr all you need to know is that he's evil. We find this out because the movie rams it down the viewers throat as seems to be the case with so many movies nowadays, 'he wants to turn me into a weapon', oh that's ok then.

One thing that's always annoyed me about the incredible Hulk is that he seems to be absolutely indestructable, we all know how it's going to turn out, people are going to shoot at him, watch as the bullets bounce off him and then somehow decide that the best course of action is to shoot at him some more, it tends to get rather old and I found myself wanting to scream IT'S NOT WORKING WHY ARE YOU STILL DOING IT.

The movie made some rather poor attempts at humour, one of the many areas that this falls flat. This seems a shame as any super hero movie needs a slap of humour on the side to remind us that it shouldn't be taken too seriously.

Well, I would recommend it to anyone looking for a simple beat 'em up but unfortunately I can't. The special effects, while not as bad as the first movie are lacking compared to a lot of movies nowadays, wouldn't you think they could have done better? Honestly, if you set out to make a movie with the Hulk then one of the first things you should sort out should be special effects.

If you really, really love super hero movies and can't get enough of Marvel, then go see Iron man instead.


My first review so any criticism is welcome, thank you.
 

Tanthalos

New member
Mar 25, 2008
203
0
0
Is it General Ross? Cause if it is the comic book reader in me will die a little inside.

Not that I especially like Hulk comics but I am getting irritated at Hollywood. They are constantly tweaking characters to the point where they are inrecognizable just so they can appeal to todays youth a little more or help the script writer out of a corner he worte himself into somewhere.

How irritating is the supporting cast? Sometimes a good sidekick or henceman can help redeem a movie.
 

Ultrajoe

Omnichairman
Apr 24, 2008
4,719
0
0
/facepalm

just... facepalm, its like you were blindfolded at every major point in this movie, i'm sorry but i have no sympathy. If you cannot decipher this film then i admire your ability to use that keyboard.
 

Stammer

New member
Apr 16, 2008
1,726
0
0
I found the movie to be The Incredible Bland for the first almost quarter, then it got interesting, then boring, and then for the whole second half it was just action-action-action. It was really good.

This is a good review. I'd just like to point out that they tried several different things than guns to bring him down.

In fact, that's what the whole movie's about. They fire sonic weapons at him, General Ross tries to make one of his best soldiers into a superhuman soldier... I dunno, I just think you're forgetting what makes the Hulk what he is.
By the way, nice Iron Man analogy. They had Stark Industries over everything in that movie, and even had Stark at the very end of the movie basically saying "I am Iron Man, I will take out the Hulk". Sequel much?
 

WlknCntrdiction

New member
May 8, 2008
813
0
0
I actually pity anyone who doesn't know the story of the Hulk already(within reason, don't be facetious), ditto goes for Iron Man or Batman or any superhero out in the limelight, seriously you actually physically need to be living under a rock not to know the story, I'm with Ultrajoe on this one.
 

WlknCntrdiction

New member
May 8, 2008
813
0
0
Stammer said:
I found the movie to be The Incredible Bland for the first almost quarter, then it got interesting, then boring, and then for the whole second half it was just action-action-action. It was really good.

This is a good review. I'd just like to point out that they tried several different things than guns to bring him down.

In fact, that's what the whole movie's about. They fire sonic weapons at him, General Ross tries to make one of his best soldiers into a superhuman soldier... I dunno, I just think you're forgetting what makes the Hulk what he is.
By the way, nice Iron Man analogy. They had Stark Industries over everything in that movie, and even had Stark at the very end of the movie basically saying "I am Iron Man, I will take out the Hulk". Sequel much?
All the superhero movies now are getting geared towards The Avengers. You have the S.H.E.I.L.D. guys at the end of Iron Man coming to Tony about "The Avengers Initiative" of some sort and then you have the ambiguous ending of The Incredible Hulk, it could mean Bruce has control of his powers or he's turned evil and that sets the theme of Iron Man going up against him for the second movie.
Can't wait until Thor makes an appearance too(can't remember what movie he's meant to cameo in though)
 

Tanthalos

New member
Mar 25, 2008
203
0
0
Going by the way they are setting things up the Avengers movie will be based on the first trade paperback of a comic story called "The Ultimates". Which means you should expect Thor to be a beer swilling, out spoken activist for...I can't quite remember and am currently sold out of the trade so I can't double check.
 

Eagle Est1986

That One Guy
Nov 21, 2007
1,976
0
0
I wasn't that impressed with the film but really think that the points you've made are quite a way off the mark.
Your review seems a little rushed too....
 

askanison4

New member
Apr 24, 2008
2
0
0
Seems like your review is a little to harsh on the film to make yourself look critical.
The film was a great watch, especially as a comic fan.
 

Ultrajoe

Omnichairman
Apr 24, 2008
4,719
0
0
WlknCntrdiction said:
I actually pity anyone who doesn't know the story of the Hulk already(within reason, don't be facetious), ditto goes for Iron Man or Batman or any superhero out in the limelight, seriously you actually physically need to be living under a rock not to know the story, I'm with Ultrajoe on this one.
you will be on most topics, its a natural impulse, don't fight it...
 

Jdopus

New member
Jun 13, 2008
113
0
0
Ok, let me make this clear, I've never read any of Marvel's comics, so I'm reviewing this without any background knowledge, however, I would say that the majority of the movie's viweers weren't.

Oh, and as to the remark about inability to decipher I understood the plot, I'm remarking that the way it was presented was somewhat lacking
 

WlknCntrdiction

New member
May 8, 2008
813
0
0
Neither have i read any of the Marvel comics, but I know alot about the superheroes and stuff, so your point is moot at best. But I'm not going to get into an argument for the sake of it lol.
I haven't even see the movie yet but I know the reason why the beginning is how it is, it was because the guy who directed it(can't remember his name now when I need it most)wanted to distance himself from Ang Lees' Hulk movie which took about half hour to set the grounding of the story.
Tbh to me I would assume that people going into watch The Incredible Hulk would know the story already which I'm assuming is what this guy thought, and rightly so.
How long had Spiderman been on the scene before they released a movie? Eons.

EDIT: Only just read the bit you put about the first movie, my bad.
 

cleverlymadeup

New member
Mar 7, 2008
5,256
0
0
Tanthalos said:
Is it General Ross? Cause if it is the comic book reader in me will die a little inside.

Not that I especially like Hulk comics but I am getting irritated at Hollywood. They are constantly tweaking characters to the point where they are inrecognizable just so they can appeal to todays youth a little more or help the script writer out of a corner he worte himself into somewhere.
yes it's General Ross as one of his main pursuers much like in the comics and he wasn't evil or anything different than a hard nosed army general who's tasked to get the Hulk back

as for backstory, that little montage at the beginning was showing how he became the Hulk and why he ran. it was pretty obvious to anyone watching that is what the opening montage was about.

now onto the other parts, the fact that he was trying NOT to get mad was because the Hulk is uncontrollable. so once he got mad and transformed into the Hulk, he had no control over his actions, they also mentioned it several times in the movie. as for being indestructible, he was very close to being so, hurting the Hulk makes him stronger and he heals very quickly

now for the Hulk fan there's a lot of fun references in it, they retcon blonsky instead of being a russian soldier, he's russian born but raised in the uk, which also explains his accent, they have Samuel Stern in there as well and give a great foreshadow for the sequel. well 2 if you realize where Bruce is at the end of the movie

ok as for the Tony Stark thing, this is in there for a few reasons. marvel is trying to show that they are all in the same universe, hence usage of Robert Downey Jr as Tony Stark in the movie and the frequent mention of S.H.I.E.L.D. and because they are going to do an avengers movie as well

this next part isn't really but figured i'd hide it, just adds some fun trivia

and now for a fun canadian twist on it. this movie was filmed in and around toronto for the most part. the campus that it takes place on is the university of toronto with some scenes at humber college. the first scene is on the main green at the u of t, the big field battle is humber college, the outside of stern's office is convocation hall (it is used a couple times), the inside, i don't know where it is

the battle between Hulk and Abomination takes place on yonge st in toronto, you can see the big Sam The Recordman sign in the trailer as well as the sign for the Zanzibar, which is a strip club a couple doors down from Sam the Recordman. sadly Sam isn't there anymore but that sign, which has been in many a movie, is in a building that is now a heritage site and can't be changed. you can also see several toronto stores and their signs in the movie with little or no editing
 

Break

And you are?
Sep 10, 2007
965
0
0
On retrospect this might have been a good choice as the chap they've cast to play Bruce Banner has all the Charisma of a rubber hammer and fails to show any emotion throughout the whole film.
..."The chap they've cast to play Bruce Banner"?

Well, it was at that point that I stopped expecting a recommendation that I could rely on. And your writing style isn't fun to read. So I didn't get much out of this review.
 

GloatingSwine

New member
Nov 10, 2007
4,544
0
0
Tanthalos said:
Going by the way they are setting things up the Avengers movie will be based on the first trade paperback of a comic story called "The Ultimates". Which means you should expect Thor to be a beer swilling, out spoken activist for...I can't quite remember and am currently sold out of the trade so I can't double check.
I think the plan is actually to have the Avengers vs. Hulk, with someone pulling the strings to bring them into conflict. (That's what the first Avengers comic story was).
 

LewsTherin

New member
Jun 22, 2008
2,443
0
0
Well, a Captain America movie is in the works, so I would assume the Avengers are being assembled....they had BETTER not mess up Thor...


http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0458339/

Overall i thought the movie wasn't bad.
it wasn't as good as it could have been, but it wasn't bad.
 

cleverlymadeup

New member
Mar 7, 2008
5,256
0
0
LewsTherin said:
Well, a Captain America movie is in the works, so I would assume the Avengers are being assembled....they had BETTER not mess up Thor...
they are making an Antman, a Thor and a new Captain America movie, after that it's avengers

i guess they're supplying some back story to the avengers first, all taking place in the same universe because of marvel studios, i hope they get all their property back and can crossover

this is something dc should learn from this because all their property is under the warner brothers flag