Except, again, that the lowest theoretically possible common denominator would not consist of less than one-fifth of the world population. (That's the actual proportion of white people in the world. And that's before sex, sexuality, age or religion enter the picture.)veloper said:The implication here is that most blockbusters cater to the dumb, or more precisely, the largest audience through lowest common denominator and that will not change.
Not quite. The problem is that when your character has a vagina, the game becomes porn.chuckdm said:Making female characters in video games attractive - even comically so - is only a bad thing if they also lack depth.
"And for fucking what?" is the problem, more precisely. Are players supposed to masturbate while playing? That's the only possible vibe I'm getting, and for that, far more effective stuff is one Google search away. Hell, let's go ahead and assume it absolutely has to take the form of a video game -- you still have a shitload of choice out there waiting for you.
So what's the point? Could it be the contrarianistic, hardly-any-less-masturbatory thrill of Offending (R) The Feminists (R)? An urge to feel like edgy, special snowflakes apparently so powerful it takes priority over stuff like not being shit -- just to be dicks to a certain group of people? How in the unholy mother of fuck is that defensible?
Also, the other problem again. The guy's a bigoted ****. Then again, this whole shitstorm -- and the fact that it is a shitstorm to begin with -- does nothing to convince me that the fault is specifically on him. As opposed to nerds at large.
So much for being Nice Guys.