J.J. Abrams Turned Down Directing New Star Wars Movies

Blood Brain Barrier

New member
Nov 21, 2011
2,004
0
0
Star Wars can have him. I did quite like Star Trek but as an action blockbuster you see every two weeks. It wasn't a Star Trek movie, and I want one of those.

However, Nemesis was worse and just about killed my TNG nostalgia. If it's a choice between Abrams and Nemesis I know which one I would go for.
 

saintdane05

New member
Aug 2, 2011
1,849
0
0
Remus said:
You forgot 2 things about J.J. Abram's movies:

Lens Flares

and LENS FLARES!


I wouldn't dare let him near the Star Wars franchise. 5 seconds with a lightsaber and the whole world would go blind.
You know why he did that, right? It was to make it look futuristic. Heck, I never noticed until rabid fanboys pointed it out.
 

Epona

Elite Member
Jun 24, 2011
4,221
0
41
Country
United States
saintdane05 said:
Remus said:
You forgot 2 things about J.J. Abram's movies:

Lens Flares

and LENS FLARES!


I wouldn't dare let him near the Star Wars franchise. 5 seconds with a lightsaber and the whole world would go blind.
You know why he did that, right? It was to make it look futuristic. Heck, I never noticed until rabid fanboys pointed it out.
Did you watch the special features? If memory serves, he did it because he likes lens flares, nothing more. No matter his reasons, he overdid it.

He also put lens flares in Super 8 which was a movie that took place in the past.
 

Sewa_Yunga

I love this highway!
Nov 21, 2011
253
0
0
I'm glad we dodged this bullet. Now, let's just put the whole franchise into the trusty hands of M. Night Shyamalan
 

Icehearted

New member
Jul 14, 2009
2,081
0
0
Remus said:
You forgot 2 things about J.J. Abram's movies:

Lens Flares and LENS FLARES!
[humorous images snipped]

I wouldn't dare let him near the Star Wars franchise. 5 seconds with a lightsaber and the whole world would go blind.
I though the same thing. Death star blasts would be so bright the first five rows of viewers would become translucent.

I don't know about this Wes Anderson, but it's been proven that Star Wars, as near perfect a property as it gets, can be fumbled fantastically by even it's creator. To be honest I find it impossible to get excited about anything Star Wars. The new trilogy murdered my childhood fondness for the series then had it's way with the carcass in strange and unnatural fashion.

Let's be silly and suggest some fun directors an imagine their vision. How about Christopher Nolan's "The Dark Side Rises" or M. Night Shyamalan's "The Wookie"? I'd pay good money to watch those.
 

mechalynx

Führer of the Sausage People
Mar 23, 2008
410
0
0
James Cameron? After all, he claims he got into the business after watching Star Wars. Pay you dues, man!
 

Scorpid

New member
Jul 24, 2011
814
0
0
I feel pretty glad about this. I don't hate JJ Abrahms but after watching how he devolved the Star Trek premise I feel like he wouldn't get Star Wars. I'd like to see them hand it to the Thor director and writer personally. They took retro designs and story of the original Thor and made it cool again while still finding an audience. Star Wars does not need more action and crazy flashy light saber duels to please its fan base.
 

Johnny Novgorod

Bebop Man
Legacy
Feb 9, 2012
19,228
3,800
118
Good riddance if you ask me. But I disagree on hiring someone like Tarantino or Anderson. They should get someone who's competent but doesn't have such a poignant directing style. Inasmuch as Tarantino's take on SW might be funny it would be more of an amusing thing than anything else. And I think at this point we need our faith on the saga renewed rather than turn it into something merely amusing o interesting.
 

Woodsey

New member
Aug 9, 2009
14,553
0
0
Abrams had nothing to do with Lost after the first season or so, and Star Trek was great. Likewise, the new writer just needs to be a good fucking writer; experience in the genre is entirely secondary to that requirement.

I am totally with the Wes Anderson vote, though.

BoogieManFL said:
I can't help but imagine how a Star Wars movie directed by Quintin Terantino would turn out.
Bloated and irritating, I imagine.
 

Quellan Thyde

New member
Jul 11, 2011
55
0
0
Can't we just let the corpse of Star Wars lie in peace without digging it up and raping it every decade? I loved IV - VI inclusive, loved them like a fat kid loves jellybeans. (Apropos enough, since I was that fat kid, but I digress.) I was ready to love the prequel trilogy as well, but three straight attempts to recapture the old magic were pissed right down the drain, leaving me the cynical and indifferent lump I am now. I'm not even angry about all this forced nostalgia; it's just sad to me that our society has become so gun-shy that spinning out a franchise where every nuance has inextricably wormed its way into the American zeitgeist -- a franchise so shackled by its success as to be enslaved by its own consumer base -- is not only seen as a good idea, but one brilliant enough to be attached to the names of every vaguely important person in Hollywood. Why is everyone so excited?

So go ahead and make VII - IX if you want, Disney. Go ahead and make all the gaiden-spinoffs of the expanded universe that you like. I may even watch them if I'm bored enough.

(I did see Moviebob's "defense" of Episode 1, before you ask. He raises a few valid points, but they don't excuse the fact that the screenplay was deeply flawed on many levels.)
 

Squilookle

New member
Nov 6, 2008
3,584
0
0
The new Star Trek film basically WAS Star Wars, only shit.

So we know exactly what his take on the series would be like anyway. I'm glad he's staying away from it.

Also I have no desire to see Tarantino turn Star Wars into a talkie talkie 3-minutes-of-action-in-the-whole-movie experience.
 

-Dragmire-

King over my mind
Mar 29, 2011
2,821
0
0
Sewa_Yunga said:
I'm glad we dodged this bullet. Now, let's just put the whole franchise into the trusty hands of M. Night Shyamalan
That could work.

In the end we find out...... The prequels never happened.

deep.

Squilookle said:
Also I have no desire to see Tarantino turn Star Wars into a talkie talkie 3-minutes-of-action-in-the-whole-movie experience.
That sounds like the original Star Wars movie (aka A new Hope).
 

chozo_hybrid

What is a man? A miserable little pile of secrets.
Jul 15, 2009
3,479
14
43
Of course he would turn it down, he's too busy making Star Trek more like Star Wars anyway. He stated he wanted to make Star Trek more like Star Wars, there was even a section on the special feature of the Star Trek dvd saying so.
 

Shocksplicer

New member
Apr 10, 2011
891
0
0
Oh, but it would have been so fitting!
A man who gets way too much credit for stuff he had nothing to do with (LOST), directing movies from a series created by a man who gets way too much credit for the good installments in said series!
 

Erttheking

Member
Legacy
Oct 5, 2011
10,845
1
3
Country
United States
Can someone tell me why the new Star Trek was shit again? I thought it was pretty good.
 

Epona

Elite Member
Jun 24, 2011
4,221
0
41
Country
United States
erttheking said:
Can someone tell me why the new Star Trek was shit again? I thought it was pretty good.
Mostly, the story made little sense (as another poster pointed out). Destroying Vulcan is beyond stupid, the lens flares were out of control, Nero was really just Shinzon, the Spock/Uhura thing was unwanted.

It was fun on it's own (the first time) but as a Trek movie, it simply doesn't measure up. The new timeline really comes down to this movie not meaning anything in the end. Which lore would a Trekkie prefer, the one with Vulcan that has been established over 4 decades or JJ's timeline? You can't have both.

I am surprised Leonard Nimoy agreed to be in this movie.
 

mechalynx

Führer of the Sausage People
Mar 23, 2008
410
0
0
erttheking said:
Can someone tell me why the new Star Trek was shit again? I thought it was pretty good.
I liked it, mostly. The only thing I didn't was that everyone was so pretty, but I was soon distracted by all the pretties.

I especially like the part with Engineer Olsson. Laughed so hard I cried in the theatre.