It didn't seem that bad in terms of making sense. Guy with grudge against the federation travels into the past and starts blowing up planets. The lens flare aren't really that bad, I don't see the connection between the two, and I actually kinda liked that.Crono1973 said:Mostly, the story made little sense (as another poster pointed out). Destroying Vulcan is beyond stupid, the lens flares were out of control, Nero was really just Shinzon, the Spock/Uhura thing was unwanted.erttheking said:Can someone tell me why the new Star Trek was shit again? I thought it was pretty good.
It was fun on it's own (the first time) but as a Trek movie, it simply doesn't measure up. The new timeline really comes down to this movie not meaning anything in the end. Which lore would a Trekkie prefer, the one with Vulcan that has been established over 4 decades or JJ's timeline? You can't have both.
I am surprised Leonard Nimoy agreed to be in this movie.
It feels like a fresh breath, and I don't see why both be canon. Isn't this the Star Trek universe where they go to the mirror dimension every five episodes? Can't it run on the DBZ time travel rules?