Proteus214 said:
As much as I like to be the one to pull for the hard-working game devs, these guys can get bent. This is NOT the kind of game that should be encouraged. Out of all the illegal activities portrayed in games, I think this is crossing some sort of line.
Is it worse than violent, repeated and casual murder? How many people can you murder in 5 minutes of GTA? How is murdering hundreds of innocent bystanders, who in real life would have families and loved ones, any better than raping a few innocents? In the first case, you ruin the lives of hundreds, even thousands. In the second case, you ruin the lives of maybe five or six people. The reason you think the murder is acceptable is because those pixels don't have lives, they don't have families or loved ones. But guess what - neither do the rape victims in the "simulators" you want to ban.
And just because you might do it in a game, it doesn't mean you approve of it in real life. Just like the vast majority of everyone who casually run over pedestrians in GTA wouldn't support someone doing just that to real people in the real world.
The_Oracle said:
Crimsane said:
The_Oracle said:
I'm sorry, you lost me at 'I own rape porn.'
Why? Rape fantasy is one of the most common fantasies among both sexes.
Because if one owns plenty of rape porn and has that as a personal fetish, they can hardly be objective about this event. I mean, if we're going to be judging people based on their reactions to this event...
If one owns plenty of games and has that as a personal hobby, they can hardly be objective in a discussion about whether or not gaming should be banned or not. Same logic, I just exchanged "rape" and "fetish" for "game" and "hobby".
Sure, rape is awful and criminal and whatnot. But newsflash, so is murder and assault. And theft. Yet these are things we tolerate, even expect in most games. Virtual world does not equal real world.
geldonyetich said:
If you're going to take the time to simulate the tears and terror in the victim [http://www.somethingawful.com/d/hentai-game-reviews/rapelay.php] (NSFW), I'd say you indeed had the goal of creating a rape simulator.
If you're going to take the time to simulate the blood and pain of the victim, I'd say you indeed had the goal of creating a murder simulator.
Come on! You people are using the exact same arguments that you laugh at the Thompsonites for using! You're just exchanging "murder" with "rape"!
samaritan.squirrel said:
What these people need is rehabilitation. Ice-cold. From a hose. Seven days a week.
>,>
Certain Rorschach tendencies surfacing here..Must..Repress..
... Yes. Much like the people who play murder simulators need rehabilitation, instead of having their murderous tendencies encouraged by the gaming industry, that provides them with all the gory FPS action they crave.
geldonyetich said:
Put another way, the other day, I was checking out a Manga Fox forum on a comic about incest. There were a number of threads going on about how okay incest really is. Guess which side would appear to be winning? That's right, if popularity on an Internet forum is all you really need to determine right from wrong, we should all be boinking our sisters right now.
Incest should be okay as long as both parties are in agreement, and the sex is non-reproductive. Because then no harm comes from it. But that's a completely different argument, because that's about goings-on in
real life, as opposed to the topic at hand that deals with occurings in games.