ACman said:
A) digital distribution is a widely accepted term.
But he wasn't saying "digital distribution," he was saying "digital games"!
Just look at the title of the video: "Don't Pay Retail Prices for Digital Games" - that makes absolutely zero sense, because digital games are retail products. It also doesn't make sense, because even if the studios cut the cost of downloadable games by 90%, those would still be retail prices, because downloadable games are retail sales! Whatever they are charging is the retail price.
And B) Seriously Aardvaarkman, everybody apart from you understood that Jim was commenting on the differences between digital distribution and retail but for some reason you want to turn this into semantics debate.
But semantics are very important. Why would you dismiss semantics as irrelevant?
OK, to put it in terms that this audience might be able to understand, it's like saying that 'Star Wars" and "Star Trek" are the same thing because they both have the word "star" in their title.
And again, what is the difference between digital distribution and retail?
Digital distribution sales are retail sales. Just because something is sold online doesn't make it something other than a retail sale. It's difficult to make a good argument when you can't get basic terms straight.
He could have easily used "bricks and mortar" and "online" to distinguish the two methods of selling. But instead, he chose to use irrelevant terms that don't actually define the differences. therefore, he undermined his own argument. And I largely agree with his argument, and The Jimquisition in general. I just don't see why he weakened his position as Good Hitler by being lazy about his terms of reference.