Wellp, that's a real shame; then again studio execs have a tendency to run their mouths a little bit. I think a tiny percentage of the problems that Dark Souls II (really? 2? No better ideas?)will face is going to be that, after these comments, people are going to be entering it expecting to have problems with the choices it makes, and then finding those problems where they might not have otherwise. Of course, remains to be seen how it actually turns out as opposed to how it's marketed. If it turns out to be just Dark Souls with a marketing budget, then we can call ourselves fortunate.
If the predictions are correct, it's potentially not so bad. So Dark Souls II would be done 'wrong', but it'd be out in the market for all to see. Then we'd just need a different, mid-tier development team from somewhere else to observe what was 'right' about Dark Souls and 'wrong' about Dark Souls II, and make their own interpretation, hopefully capturing the feel of the first two 'Souls'. Sure it wouldn't be a Souls game, but thems the breaks I suppose.
Slim chance is still a chance, I say.
Also, the combination of the suit, hat and gloves is giving Jim a real resemblance to some kind of apocalyptic mayor. I want this man at the head of my cabinet. Whatever that means.