Jimquisition: I'm Going To Murder Your Children

Recommended Videos

TWEWYFan

New member
Mar 22, 2012
343
0
0
Monxeroth said:
Bad yes but inevitable.
Short answer: Because democracy
Long answer: If we have to have an inclusive and appealing community like we say we do then we have to deal with the fact that since we let everyone in on the same terms, not everyone is gonna want to exist within the community on the same terms and will break rules and will behave in a toxic way to ruin it for everyone, because we seriously shouldnt censor them or just delete, ban or run the community with an iron fist. Its not ok or right to call someone a retarded monkey with downs syndrome on the web but neither should it be illegal, and for those who say that we should make some thing illegal, most of them already are. It is illegal to make death threats in any format, it is already illegal in some countries to use racial terms on the internet and such, we already have the tools for that. What we dont have the tools for it seems in most gaming communities, are the tools to combat the toxic people who may not break the rules but are disruptive towards other members of it.
Toxicity should be punished i believe and it should be mocked and frowned up, but then at the same time we also have to highlight as many good things as possible about the personalities in the community who do behave in an exemplary way.
I think that's a pretty good perspective to take on this, especially with such a tricky issue.
 

Jenny Jones

New member
Jun 10, 2013
63
0
0
Jimothy Sterling said:
I'm Going To Murder Your Children

If your first response to a game creator doing something you dislike is to get personal with them and threaten their families, you waive any righteousness you might have had. Seems like a no-brainer ... yet so few of us seem to have brains.

Watch Video
I think it's also worth pointing out what's happening with the media shitstorm over ask.fm and twitter in regards to abuse. If we let people continue threatening and bullying others on the internet we will get regulation, restrictions, monitoring and all sorts of other shit. Now some may not care, others might welcome it but we will say goodbye to a lot of the freedom we have been afforded if we continue letting a few idiots behave like this without being shunned, ignored and told to effectively piss off.

I mean look at what Mr Cameron is trying to get ISP's to do, install filters at network level to filter all adult content by default. Adult content includes anything pornographic, violent and "extreme political views". The internet and any regulation won't be decided by a group of tech savvy, veteran forum users. It will be decided by middle aged politicians who may or may not have a clue about how to even install an ad blocker.

In my book any form of death threat whether it's to the person you are talking to or their wider family/friends is unacceptable and crossing the line. If we don't remove these pests then someone else will and I guarantee they will not have your best interests at heart.
 

RA92

New member
Jan 1, 2011
3,078
0
0
jluzar20 said:
Yeah, I know he's not calling me a sick fuck personally, but white knights always leave a bitter taste in my mouth.
Oh look, another guy who didn't watch the video.

He can't really be a white knight when he also mentioned the men getting death threats as well (one of whom, Phil Fish, had gotten an entire episode from Jim himself), eh?
 

SonOfVoorhees

New member
Aug 3, 2011
3,509
0
0
Agreed. Disagree with something, fine. But the death threats? So not cool. Anyone here have read books, watched movies or listened to songs that sucked. But we dont call death threats on them. Seems thats a game only thing. An yes people saying it are arseholes, but if you had kids you would take those threats seriously. Regardless if its some anon guy, you still would take it seriously. End of the day, yes a game sucked, ME3 ending sucked, i got over that after an hour. An this is after re buying ME1 and ME2 before ME3 was released to replay those games. ME3 ending sucked. But, people are acting like its a cancer thats eating their brain and only a good ending can fix it. Get over it. If a bad game ending is that bad that it effects you months later, then you have major issues.

Now these arseholes are using language to state their level of anger. They wont rape or kill or anything, though if you are on the receiving end im sure you will worry. Especially if you have kids. On this site this language is not acceptable. On others it is. Thing is the stories in that game would good, just the repeating levels etc sucked. Gamers need to stop expecting everything to be awesome. CoD is awesome because it knows what the fans want. It cant fail. Others try something different, fail, but people call death to everyone involved. You know what, with out new ideas, we would still be playing Pong.
 

IamLEAM1983

Neloth's got swag.
Aug 22, 2011
2,578
0
0
ChrowX said:
IamLEAM1983 said:
*complaints about immature children playing video games*
I'm not trying to misrepresent your argument, something about having a stack of quotes within quotes and giant posts just sort of irks me, so please don't take this the wrong way.
There's nothing for me to take the wrong way. It's standard post snipping. No worries.

ChrowX said:
But the terrible, immature, rude, obnoxious gamers who make the rest of us look bad has always been an issue, and we all know it. This much is true, but there's one problem with Jim coming to a site like this and speaking directly at the camera to chastise us with generalities about our behavior as a community: We're not those people.

For the most part, the sort of gamers who do that, the ones who insult and send death threats, and whip their controllers across the room when they lose, and send death threats to developers for patching their favorite sniper rifle, and infect the whole community with an air of hostility and vulgarity don't come to sites like this. They don't.
Quite true, but the problem is their vocal nature. Non-gamers only perk their ears when some truly horrid howling is heard from our hills, so to speak, so they get the impression that your average gamer is somewhere up there with your average bath salts-snorting face-muncher. Either we segregate them, or we teach the greater masses to disregard the howler monkeys we've got in our midst.

ChrowX said:
And just because it's worth mentioning, since Jim won't talk about this sort of thing, but take a look at this. http://gamerfury.tumblr.com/ That's some of the collection of some of the tweets that one of the Call of Duty developers received, which Jim mentioned.
Saw it a few weeks ago. Made me ashamed to be a gamer, honestly. Or, to be more precise, it made me proud that I was old enough to be able to distance myself from co-op or competitive gaming and go back to my personal roots whenever the primates become too hard to bear. I'm a point-and-click and role-playing type of gamer, for the most part, with a very casual investment in a couple shooters. I'm one of million other guys and gals like myself, and we all probably feel grossly misrepresented by the general idea the rest of the world has of the gamer culture.
 

Erttheking

Member
Legacy
Oct 5, 2011
10,845
1
3
Country
United States
gigastar said:
I dont condone the threats made against her, but i will not say that im sorry that she left the gaming industry.

Not because shes a mediocre writer, but because she has gone on record saying that games would be better if they removed interactivity.

Which begs the question, why get into an industry focused on interactive entertainment, if you want to minimise the interactivity? Why not write books, movie scripts or TV shows?
And here is a major problem I have with the whole issue.

First of all she didn't say that, she said that she was tired of how games were always about violence and killing as opposed to something else. Second of all, even if she did say that, why does it matter? She wasn't ripping all of the gameplay out of Dragon Age 2, her opinion was just that, her opinion. It wasn't hurting anyone, why do we care about it? Thirdly, the woman got death threats and people keep bringing this up, why? We have an example of how frighteningly toxic our culture can get, and people keep trying to bring up this harmless thing that she said so long ago. You are missing the point! A massive amount of hate was directed towards this woman, threats and harassment, and people still keep bringing up what she said as if it was some unspeakable sin that we shouldn't let go. It was just an opinion, I myself think that it was a dumb opinion, but that's all it was, a dumb opinion. I don't see why we need to keep bringing it up at every turn and I really don't see what harm it did.
 

jluzar20

New member
Apr 29, 2013
25
0
0
Raiyan 1.0 said:
jluzar20 said:
Yeah, I know he's not calling me a sick fuck personally, but white knights always leave a bitter taste in my mouth.
Oh look, another guy who didn't watch the video.

He can't really be a white knight when he also mentioned the men getting death threats as well (one of whom, Phil Fish, had gotten an entire episode from Jim himself), eh?
You lost me...
I mentioned how the last few videos, the Phish one included, seemed to have a theme of him beating us with his moral superiority. Sounds white knightish to me, and less than deserving of an entertainment video column.
 

Erttheking

Member
Legacy
Oct 5, 2011
10,845
1
3
Country
United States
jluzar20 said:
Raiyan 1.0 said:
jluzar20 said:
Yeah, I know he's not calling me a sick fuck personally, but white knights always leave a bitter taste in my mouth.
Oh look, another guy who didn't watch the video.

He can't really be a white knight when he also mentioned the men getting death threats as well (one of whom, Phil Fish, had gotten an entire episode from Jim himself), eh?
You lost me...
I mentioned how the last few videos, the Phish one included, seemed to have a theme of him beating us with his moral superiority. Sounds white knightish to me, and less than deserving of an entertainment video column.
The definition of a white knight

http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=white%20knight

It doesn't really match up with what Jim is doing at all.
 

cthulhuspawn82

New member
Oct 16, 2011
321
0
0
How many people honestly sent death threats to Hepler about her children? I bettering it was no more then a few(3-4) and likely as little as 1.

The problem is that this stuff is meant to stir up fake controversy. Its an excuse for the victim to point the finger at all of us and tell us what a bad group of people we are. I think its deplorable that someone would send death threats about a Woman's children. That doesn't mean I am OK with the victims of such crimes using it as an excuse to shout, "Look, look, I'm being oppressed" and try to villainize against all of their critics, including the one that only make fair and logical criticism and don't send death threats, by putting them in the same category.

If I were in the same position as her, and got those death threats, none of you would know about it. I would simply delete the email. If I felt it was a real enough treat I would tell the police. I wouldn't feel the need to post them on a blog or message board somewhere as a means of casting guilt on the gaming community and bashing my critics.
 

jluzar20

New member
Apr 29, 2013
25
0
0
erttheking said:
jluzar20 said:
Raiyan 1.0 said:
jluzar20 said:
Yeah, I know he's not calling me a sick fuck personally, but white knights always leave a bitter taste in my mouth.
Oh look, another guy who didn't watch the video.

He can't really be a white knight when he also mentioned the men getting death threats as well (one of whom, Phil Fish, had gotten an entire episode from Jim himself), eh?
You lost me...
I mentioned how the last few videos, the Phish one included, seemed to have a theme of him beating us with his moral superiority. Sounds white knightish to me, and less than deserving of an entertainment video column.
The definition of a white knight

http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=white%20knight

It doesn't really match up with what Jim is doing at all.
I see your point, but I've always considered white knighting on the internet as the defense of anyone from a flimsy argument. I appreciate the context, though.
 

JasonBurnout16

New member
Oct 12, 2009
385
0
0
I can't help but think that this video is rather pointless - the people that Jim is making this video to argue against are unlikely to watch this. I think most of us know that it's BAD to say such things, it's just a few idiots who have to ruin it for the rest of us.
 

RA92

New member
Jan 1, 2011
3,078
0
0
uanime5 said:
I suspect Jim fails to provide a reason why the topic was changed because he doesn't have a real reason. He could have easily ignored these threats and talked about his DLC topic as planned, so his attempts to blame this on other people is somewhat immature.

Jim also ignores that Hepler was responsible for writing the story for Dragon Age 2 so she was responsible for many of the things that were wrong with it; specifically the bad story and inconsistent characters. The fact that Jim seems to believe that Hepler was being abused for being creative, rather being than utterly inept and writing terrible stories, just shows that he hasn't bothered to research why people didn't like her. Jim's attempts to deify Hepler to hide his white knighting isn't fooling anyone.

I doubt Hepler's departure will discourage those with talent from writing for games, mainly because those with talent tend to be praised rather than scorned. It's only the utterly inept and entitled writers who expect everyone to love their stories, no matter how badly written these stories are, who get condemned by the majority of gamers. Here's hoping that gamers continue to criticise inept writers that produce bad stories, which ruin popular franchises.

Finally it's funny how Jim is always harping on about how developers should be able to make the games they want but keeps condemning people for giving honest opinions about just how bad these games are.
Now imagine instead of critiquing the merits of your argument, my friends and I gang up on you and start blathering threats about killing your loved ones.
 

JemJar

New member
Feb 17, 2009
730
0
0
If Jim were a forum poster, we'd all be telling him to stop feeding the trolls.

Between this, the Anita Sarkesian thing and the Dragon's Crown review "controversy"; the whole message can be summed up by "Hey jerks, stop being ridiculous over-the-top jerks" and yet without Jim ranting for however many minutes about it, I'd never have heard about any of them.

If nothing else, the people who act out like that probably love the fact that it kicks up a storm. And those of us who watch the Jimquisition just get a bit fed up of being called "sick fuck(s)".
 

jluzar20

New member
Apr 29, 2013
25
0
0
Raiyan 1.0 said:
Now imagine instead of critiquing the merits of your argument, my friends and I gang up on you and start blathering threats about killing your loved ones.
HAHA! How is that different than any other day on the internet? If you haven't gotten a death threat or someone telling you to kill yourself, you're not doing it right.
 

RA92

New member
Jan 1, 2011
3,078
0
0
Retrograde said:
Raiyan 1.0 said:
jluzar20 said:
Yeah, I know he's not calling me a sick fuck personally, but white knights always leave a bitter taste in my mouth.
Oh look, another guy who didn't watch the video.

He can't really be a white knight when he also mentioned the men getting death threats as well (one of whom, Phil Fish, had gotten an entire episode from Jim himself), eh?
If someone has formed an opinion of you based on your previous writings and video content across multiple websites over a span of years, is that your fault or theres? His rep is well earned.
He didn't know what 'white-knighting' actually meant. You started posting on this thread without even watching the video.

I don't know who should be responsible for your ignorance, but it sure as hell ain't Jim's.
 

Zombie_Moogle

New member
Dec 25, 2008
666
0
0
Retrograde said:
Zombie_Moogle said:
Yes. Yes it does reflect on gamers, because we should be better

We should be better because we are. We're not rabid acolytes of the flavor-of-the-month pop musician. We're not fundamentalists of ancient, backwards politics. We're the culture of the most advanced & promising art form in the known universe

Act like it
Honest Injun here, this is as direct and tone free as it can be I assure you. Are you being funny here? This post is humourous, right?
Quite the opposite.

As others in this discussion forum have made very clear to you already, subcultures are viewed as a collective. It's not just some random asshole on the internet that can't buy or even sell certain games in countries like Australia, it's everyone. Like it or not, we're judged as a group & need to take a certain level of responsibility for the actions of the group. I didn't send those threatening emails, & odds are neither did you, but responding with inaction & indifference makes us complicit. Saying nothing is the same thing as condoning it.

As a culture that often identifies by both its intellect & history of social stratification & inequity, we should be above that. I'm not saying it will never happen, there will always be trolls. I'm saying we should be holding ourselves to a higher standard than rabid One Direction fangirls
 

RA92

New member
Jan 1, 2011
3,078
0
0
jluzar20 said:
Raiyan 1.0 said:
Now imagine instead of critiquing the merits of your argument, my friends and I gang up on you and start blathering threats about killing your loved ones.
HAHA! How is that different than any other day on the internet? If you haven't gotten a death threat or someone telling you to kill yourself, you're not doing it right.
So by your standards then, Jennifer Hepler did exceptionally well. ;)
 

MB202

New member
Sep 14, 2008
1,157
0
0
Death threats: never a good thing, no matter how angry you are. Really? Did this really need to be spelled out for people?
 

Weaver

Overcaffeinated
Apr 28, 2008
8,976
0
0
The only thing I don't like about this episode is that it sounds like it's directed at me, accusing me (the viewer) of threatening Hepler directly when I also think it's idiotic, harmful and likely illegal.
 

ShirowShirow

New member
Oct 14, 2010
206
0
0
You know, I think anyone whose immediate response to this isn't "Yeah, fuck those guys!" is part of the problem. Death-threat spewing, insane fanatical assholes that infest our community need to be cast out and ostracized. They need to be exiled and we need to show that THEY DO NOT DEFINE US.

Anyone who thinks "Oh they should just grow thicker skin" or "Oh stop making general statements" or "Oh focus on the good" or "Oh blah blah men blah misandry" are indirectly supporting the behavior by not showing it the absolute contempt it deserves.